BrainTrust Query: Time and Choices
Through a special arrangement, presented here for discussion is a summary of an article from Views on the World of Shoppers, Retailers and Brands, the blog of TNS Retail and Shopper.
Among the teachings of Joe Girard, identified by The Guinness Book of World Records as “The World’s Greatest Salesman,” are focusing on the customers’ time and their choices — both of which are regularly ignored by today’s retail staffs.
One subject in his book, “How to Close Every Sale,” was that “The Prospect’s [Customer’s] Time is Valuable.”
Mr. Girard writes, “Every sales person has had it drilled into his or her skull that time is money and should be valued accordingly. So I won’t give you another lecture on time management. Instead, I’ll emphasize instead the importance of also realizing the value of your prospect’s [customer’s] time.”
Joe Girard’s perspective here is exactly the same as my own principle that, “The faster you sell, the more you will sell!” No real salesperson would ever be confused about this issue, and yet it is diametrically opposed to standard retailer desire to get the shopper to spend more time in their stores. As one senior shopper “expert” with one of the major brands told me, “We want the shopper to spend time carefully considering our merchandise.” Both the retailer’s view, and the supplier’s, have the air of thoughtful consideration of the shopper and the sales process, but both are actually sales termites. They steadily erode the performance of the store and brand by impeding rapid selections of merchandise.
The other closely-related subject in the book was Joe Girard’s “Choices of Three” perspective:
“Over the years, I have discovered that the more choices presented to prospects [shoppers,] the more difficult it becomes for them to make up their minds. While I don’t have concrete evidence backed by formal research, I have observed that when people have to choose from more than three choices, they have a hard time determining which to pick. … I recommend offering a maximum of three.”
This principle reinforces what we say about focusing on the top sellers. You can only use Joe Girard’s selling principles selectively in the store if you expect them to be effective. If you use them widely, you are trying to “sell more than three,” and your efforts, no matter how good, will be diluted severely and simply become more “noise” in the shopping environment. Fortunately, you can be pretty sure that your competition is churning out a lot of noise. This is your opportunity to provide selective selling to just a few items (a few dozen for a 40,000 item store, but a literal few — 3 — for a few dozen items in a brand or category.)
The skills Mr. Girard discusses were likely lost as retail migrated over the last century from ‘active, personal selling’ — in which a salesperson guides and expedites the purchase by a customer — to ‘passive selling,’ or the self-service environments that dominate retail today. But in many ways, the thinking of people like Joe Girard are right at the cutting edge of real selling, even in the self-service world.
- How to Close Every Sale – Shopper Scientist
- Shopper Efficiency vs. Total Store Sales – Shopper Scientist
Discussion Questions: How can largely self-service retailers incorporate some ’active selling’ techniques into their selling environments? Does retail need to rethink its approach to valuing the customer’s time as well as encouraging a few choices among the many offered?
Take Our Instant Poll
Loading ...
Join the Discussion!
10 Comments on "BrainTrust Query: Time and Choices"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I can’t think of a post I’ve disagreed with more than this. “Sales termites?” The world of profitable retail isn’t convenience store stop ‘n shop. High-end, luxury retailers, Nordstrom and a host of clients I work with know that selling takes time and energy to bring the customers choices down to two or three.
It takes training of sales skills, people skills and engaged employees.
Can this strategy really apply to product categories with various specifications such as digital cameras and flat-panel displays?
What are the factors that make the three product lines different from each other to make a choice? Color? Flavor? Size? This strategy appears to assume that products have little differentiation from each other.
I am inclined to believe that if a customer cannot choose between more than three items, then the retailer did not categorize the products properly or place the product in proper context.
We are talking about a self service environment in today’s retail reality. There is little to no selling staff on the floor of most grocery stores. In many to most hard goods stores, the support function isn’t much better. As a general rule, I would agree with Dr. Sorensen that the selection should be moderated. Is three the magic number? Maybe. It could be slightly more.
Categorizing products would help. As an example, most Salty Snack sections are set by vendor. We drive customers through the gates of hell to make a subcategory selection up and down 60 feet of space to decide on a Tortilla chip. This does not encourage fast shopping, nor does it encourage profitability. It does not reflect the availability of selection in which the retailer has invested retailer dollars.
There is much we can do to make the shopping experience faster and ease shopper frustration.
How does one create sales urgency in today’s retail environment when the untrained sales staff is behind the register waiting for the customer to come to them?
If you’ve ever taken a shopping list from a spouse into a supercenter and tried to find 10 SKUs that you aren’t familiar with, you know about the “paradox of choice.” For fast moving consumer goods, I think that for most retailers it comes down to having the 40,000 or so SKUs that they carry available via an easy-to-understand layout AND making the top 200 or so items highly visible so that people can “grab and go.”
Let me add that Al McClain has captured the essence of the issue perfectly. Kudos from me to Al. 😉
Retailers who are relying on customers to identify the merchandise they wish to purchase must rely on merchandising and product placement to help customers winnow down the options to a reduced quantity for purchase.
The famous “jam study” showed that customers actually purchase less when given more choices. Lacking the live intermediary (the trained sales associate), the store must find some way to help consumers narrow their choices.
The answer is merchandising — digital and physical signage, as well as product placement in logical groupings to save consumers time. The new digital signage is too often used as an advertising vehicle, with removes its greatest benefit, to be an engaging method of helping customers understand the potential product solutions and the needs they best fit.
While this approach will never replace the trained skillful sales associate, merchandising is a key solution to consumer confusion, frustration and lack of retention that we see so often in our commoditized retail environment.