FDBuyer: Clubbing The Clubs

Through a special arrangement, presented here for discussion
is a summary of a current article from Frozen & Dairy Buyer magazine.
For
supermarkets getting clubbed by club stores and losing share, experts advise
grocers to focus on selection, convenience and quality. And — perhaps most
important — be sure to stand for something.
“If you are all things
to all people, you are nothing to anybody,” said
Jim Hertel, managing partner, Willard Bishop LLC.
He advises being sure you
are equal or better than your competition on things that are important to your
best customers. That starts with a thorough understanding of your best customers,
something that supermarket operators are getting better at all the time.
“Go through everything in your offering — meat, produce, service,
cleanliness, dairy, frozen and all the key differentiators,” Mr. Hertel
said. “Consider your own strengths and vulnerabilities, and do the same
for your competitors. Choose areas where you want to make a stand, and then
be the significant leader in your market.”
Michael Clayman, editor of Warehouse
Club Focus, a newsletter based
in Foxboro, Mass., said that part of every supermarket operator’s homework
should be walking the club stores on a regular basis.
“Theoretically, at least, the clubs stock only those items with high
sales per square foot, or they wouldn’t be there. If you see something
you don’t
have, consider it — either branded or private label,” he said.
Discussion Questions: How should supermarkets position themselves to face
competition from club stores? What advantages should supermarkets be exploiting?
Where shouldn’t they try to best clubs?
Join the Discussion!
20 Comments on "FDBuyer: Clubbing The Clubs"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not only are supermarkets losing market share to club stores but even worse, the forward buying and volumes purchased by consumers actually take them right out of the market for many days, weeks, or months, for any given product.
What supermarkets need to do is to stand for something. SKU rationalization is NOT the answer. Ironically, supermarkets need to carry several items and specialties NOT carried by club stores. In addition supermarkets need to show consumers that they can still purchase smaller convenient sizes and quantities of their favorite products without paying a premium.
So interesting that we worry over share taken by club stores, even as we rationalize the assortment down to club levels.
At the end of the day, it’s about selection/convenience vs. quantity. Supermarkets differentiate themselves through broad assortments and small quantities. Warehouse stores differentiate through large quantities for somewhat lower prices (not always lower…but sometimes).
The best thing supermarkets can do is keep reasonable pack-size and broad selection.
I have the sinking feeling that I am about to embark on an “army of one” mission here, but what the heck.
The battle between Club and Supermarkets is indeed about selection. But it’s not what Club’s don’t have that is making the difference–it’s about what they DO have. We started out buying supplies for our small office at Sam’s Club before Costco came to Chicago. Within a year we had switched, and our trip missions went from 90% business and 10% personal at Sam’s Club to 50/50 or better at Costco.
We buy produce, seafood, cheeses, crackers, ice cream, wines and occasionally meats or bakery that are all superior to the quality we can get at our local supermarket. And “we” are an army of two in our household–not ten.
Costco is simply providing higher quality selections of unusual items and brands at good prices. It works.
Great A&P has been testing club paks with some success.
During its current Festival Italiano, a large club pak of various pasta sauces and pastas are being offered at special savings.
Also their private label offerings of Via Roma authentic Italian food products, Green Way organic dairy, poultry, produce, juices, jellies and preserves, pastas, veggies and organic cleaning products are priced lower than equivalent club paks. Same holds true for the newly launched Food Basics line of quality entry center aisle food products as well as Home Basics line of bathroom tissues, detergents, paper towels and food protection wraps.
I’m going to enlist in Ben’s army. The quality of many items offered at COSTCO is superior–certainly at the price point–to what’s available at their competition.
Now, having said that, this conversation strikes me as a bit of deja vu.
Hasn’t the time to worry about inherent channel advantages or disadvantages passed a decade or two ago? The surviving clubs also have customer loyalty on their side–something I haven’t seen discussed–again except for Ben.
There are no magic bullets or secrets. Know your customers. Who are the 20% that provide 80% of your sales? What do they NOT get at the club stores that they want? How can you provide more of what they want? Then position yourself as that solution provider in your community.
Great discussion. As many have already pointed out, the “right” selection for the market is a key element to remaining competitive after the intrusion of a player like Costco. That obviously presumes an in-depth understanding of the customer base, both the customers you have as well as the customers you want and then delivering what they want (hey, retail isn’t that hard).
The hard part, which hasn’t been mentioned so far, is that these customers and what they want will vary, in some cases substantially, between locations, definitely geographically and even in the same market areas. This is, in my view at least, the reason that SKU rationalization has been so problematic. SKUs are typically rationalized based on company total sales, although relative SKU contributions vary significantly by locale. Some retailers, like Whole Foods, got this from the start. Others are beginning to get it, as evidenced by Wal-Mart’s recent re-organization into three separate regions.
Supermarkets already have the differentiator in convenience, customer service and product range over the super club stores. Supermarkets have to continue to let their customers know they stand for something the clubs do not give. That is the convenience of buying smaller, more readily usable quantities and product availability at all times.
I often shop both the same day. It interests me to see watch the level of service seen and the differentiators. I rarely see poor customer service at the traditional supermarket chains and rarely see high quality customer service at the club level. Supermarkets have to continue to stress that they are your neighbors.
Club assortments have been improving in both quantity and quality in recent years, making this a harder area for traditional supermarket retailers to differentiate themselves. It is worth noting that smaller “neighborhood store”-format supermarkets seem to be doing well, as are extreme-value formats. Someone who just needs to buy a few items probably doesn’t want to deal with navigating a crowded, mammoth club store or pay jacked-up c-store prices. By going local and low-price, supermarkets can effectively compete.
If preference in grocery shopping is viewed primarily as a choice among price, selection, and perceived quality of products offered by clubs and supermarkets, the clubs have the current advantage. But innovative supermarkets have great potential to fashion a new paradigm for themselves.
The time is overdue for supermarkets to reinvent themselves by integrating deeper into the daily lifestyles and desires of today’s shoppers. Supermarkets should seek to be more than just accommodates of food and home supplies but also of life’s other “sought after values.” People want more “joys” in their growing troublesome lives. And since they go to supermarkets more frequently than most other places what better place to enjoy those other “values”–if provided–than at supermarkets. Wish I could share more info here but in the meantime–think about it.
As we’ve seen from the likes of Costco, sometimes even selection won’t help you when you compete against them. The only answer, it seems to us, is Customer Experience. Yes, that semi nebulous term that everyone’s bantering around is THE critical element in terms of competing against the boxes/clubs.
Why? Because they don’t have one. It’s a “non-experience”. You serve yourself, you almost check yourself out and you walk a mile to your car. I mean, it’s a warehouse! It really is!
Therefore, your customer experience needs to be about the opposite of that: service, comfort, speed, warmth, fast response … valet parking?? Think of the things they’re not and be that. As Sam Walton himself once said, “It’s easy to compete with us. Just do what we don’t do.” Right!
Although I was initially dubious about Costco, not being someone who needs to bulk-buy now that my family has grown, I am a definite convert to their selection and quality (Go Ben, Go Ryan, I’m with you).
I can see why people don’t like having to go to multiple stores to tick all the items on their shopping list. Here I’m probably in a minority – while shopping isn’t my favorite activity, I strongly feel that the balance offered by club stores and supermarkets shouldn’t be dismissed. There are huge opportunities for supermarkets to offer things that simply are not suitable for clubs. They shouldn’t try to compete or persuade shoppers to choose clubs vs supermarkets. Providing choice is what supermarkets were born to do. Don’t make shopping an either or proposition.