Retail TouchPoints: 3 Key Tenets for Retailers to Win the Customer Race

By John Gaffney
Through
a special arrangement, presented here for discussion is an excerpt of a
current article from the Retail TouchPoints website.
As chairman and president
of automated feedback solution provider Mindshare, Rich Hanks simply wanted
to publish a book that contained usable information for executives struggling
with the practical applications of customer service and how that service
hits or misses with customers.
Now that
"Delivering and Measuring Customer Service" has hit its second
printing, and counts Stephen Covey, Harvard’s Clayton Christensen and CarMax
chairman Bill Tiefel among its fans, the former
EVP at Marriott is applying his simple approach to a complex set of economic
conditions.
"Sometimes we want
to do the coolest stuff or try the latest marketing fad, but maybe we need
to stay with the basics right now," he said.
For retailers, he comes
back to three main customer strategy tenets that he firmly believes will
provide the best chance to compete and win.
The first is customer
retention. Regardless of the numbers consulting companies will apply to
this concept, such as Mr. McKinsey’s famous "customer acquisition
is ten times more expensive than retention," Mr. Hanks believes the
overarching importance of this argument involves loyalty. Even in the current
retail environment in which customers have most likely shopped outside
of their patterns to hit discounts, he stresses retention above all.
"Do everything in
your power to keep current customers," he said. "If retailers
are looking at spending money on TV for example to get new customers, I
would say you need to revisit that spending. Don’t be extreme about it,
but unless you’re a brand new company, that customers you have are going
to generate the stories and recommendations that become your best acquisition
tool."
His second principle
is the imperative of delivering customer service and measuring its effects.
Unless a retailer is at the low end of pricing (Walmart) it’s the only way to win. Surprisingly, Mr. Hanks
recommends a mix of qualitative and quantitative information to measure
customer satisfaction. The automated part of that data equation must be
accessible to everyone in the company, he said. The qualitative part can
be delivered by empathetic executives.
"At Marriott every
new hire worked in a hotel for two weeks," he said.
"Empathy means you have the ability to see something from the other
person’s perspective. It’s an essential skill."
Mr. Hanks’ third takeaway
is based on execution. Good strategy is fairly common when it comes to
customer service; good execution is not. The key is front line employees,
who make $10 per hour and are the face of your company, are the key to
that execution. "Hire friendly and teach the skills, as Bill Marriott
used to say," he said.
Discussion Questions:
What do you think of Rich Hank’s three tenets for customer service? Of
the three – customer retention, measuring customer satisfaction and front-line
execution – which is most important during tougher economic times? If
different, which is most underemphasized?
Join the Discussion!
21 Comments on "Retail TouchPoints: 3 Key Tenets for Retailers to Win the Customer Race"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
While there is no question about the importance of customer service and execution, if you don’t retain your customers, those capabilities are irrelevant. The business case for investing in existing customers, even at the expense of acquisition, has long been proven out. Yet as Mr. Hanks points out, many companies continue to over-invest in mass media and under-invest in customers.
The three tenets though are fully linked. Customer retention and loyalty only exist where companies provide at least adequate customer service and execute a sound plan. Just like advertising, customer retention strategies don’t work if it’s a bad product or service.
Customer service is important all the time, not just in economic downturns. Showing customers respect and solving their problems is never out of style. The key is teaching the company’s core story to frontline personnel. Management must do this and then back up its words with its own “customer service” to those employees.
Mr. Hank’s points are all correct (who could argue with such an ‘apple pie’ argument?). Of the three, it’s the third (execution) that seems to be the area of greatest opportunity for retailers.
It’s rare to find a retailer that doesn’t understand the first two tenents, but it’s also equally rare to find one that can execute on the service promise. Go shopping in your local mall today and just watch the ‘service’ you’ll get.
This solution is all about MORE: More time spent on hiring, More time spent training, More time spent coaching.
I think it’s a sad state of affairs if business executives need to read a book like this. This should be basic business 101 stuff. If top-level execs don’t know this stuff, they shouldn’t be in the positions they’re in.
Just one more reason accountants make lousy CEO’s. All companies should be run by marketing and sales people, for only they truly understand the importance of building client relationships.
Front-line execution is the most critical of these 3 key points because you MUST execute in order to retain your current customers/clients. While measurement can tell you whether or not you are executing the front-line training and monitoring will deliver good numbers when you do measure.
When you do a good job of execution, new business can come from many sources including your current satisfied customers.
I would think front-line execution is the most critical because without it, all other measurements would suffer. So we need to fix that before we look at any other aspect of our business.
Who on RW could argue with these three? Execution, follow through, whatever you call it, is key. Best intentions produce nothing.
A company called RightNow has a self-assessment form that retailers can use to see how well they communicate with customers across channels. It’s fascinating to see how low most retailers score themselves on the assessment. This is the area that retailers will need to concentrate upon, because as one CIO recently noted, “if you don’t have a customer culture, you’re already dead.”
Companies with the best employees and managers win.
To have the best you must attract, hire, and retain the best.
The question about which is most important should not even need to be asked. If you want to retain your present customers and deliver great customer service you are going to need a great front-line employee.
It will be interesting to see if most retailers ever wake up and realize they get what they deserve and what they pay for.
Most retailers will not pay for a front-line that is motivated and professional. Even if they were willing to do so they are not willing to pay for managers who are able to manage a quality workforce.
Of the three, execution is the most important and the hardest to accomplish. Terrific service strategies, the latest and greatest CRM software implementations, and quantitative analysis are conjured up at home offices around the retail world all the time. The biggest challenge is consistent implementation and execution across the brand. The stores in the backyard of the home office are usually where you find the best execution of the model because there is greater visibility.
Retail winners realize that the successful implementation of any initiative depends solely on the buy in from the field with field leadership leading the way. Often multiple initiatives are implemented too fast and furious which results in field leadership and associate fatigue. This fatigue leads to poor implementation and follow through of even the best strategies because they are constantly wondering “Ok, so what’s next?”
I stand with Nikki on this one. What get measured gets managed. Tracking customer satisfaction and intent is a crucial activity. Making the results known across the length and breadth of the organization is fundamental to front-line performance and customer retention.
Yes Kevin, Hanks’ arguments are “apple pie” and unfortunately a bit generic for my taste. It’s not the emphasis on customer retention that’s non-obvious, it’s the HOW. It’s not the emphasis on front-line execution that’s non-obvious, it’s the HOW.
In my writings on customer service I consistently return to the mantra, “It’s The Practice!” Setting abstract goals is fine for executives isolated in their corner offices, but success comes from a combination of enablement and measurement.
Meeting customer expectations of customer service. Customer expectations are different with each class of retailers. Target does a great of running clean, well-merchandised stores that are easy to navigate and are in-stock with very good customer throughput at the point of sale. Nordstrom on the other hand is legendary for sales associates going the extra mile for the customer.
Nordstrom is great at meeting the one on one customer service expectation compared to like retailers. Target understands the one on man strategy through design, merchandising, and point of sale.
Just as a point of reference, Lowe’s is one store that struggles with the one-on-many concept of customer service as well as customer throughput at the point of sale. You are never going to find help in the plumbing department and you can count on a lengthy checkout line.
I am curious as to what expectation Lowe’s operate under as it pertains to the discussion….
Its all about execution. Why? Because nowadays, it is all about word-of-mouth. Primary target for retail MARCOM? The Associate who is the front-line brand steward. Sure it’s not easy to change the paradigm. But, Retail ain’t for sissies!
To a large degree, these three tenets could be called the three “duhs” of retailing. Especially the execution tenet. C’mon.
The biggest piece of the puzzle to turning a company into a customer service organization is hiring. You must hire people that love your product and actually love talking to and dealing with people. Southwest Airlines puts it best with their “hire for attitude, train for skill” slogan. Right! And look at their people/service compared to any other airline.
Starbucks is another great example of solid hiring practices–in any actual Starbucks store (not the ones run by other companies, like the Host-run units in airports) you’re likely to find a crew that has fun addressing people and just plain glad to be there.
So, let’s start at the beginning and get the right people in the right place. You’ll have to worry a lot less about the three “duhs” if you do that.
All three tenets are logical, rational and quite familiar to anyone who is truly focused on customer service. Nothing new here. But the ‘measuring’ part, that’s the challenge. I see so few companies have a way to understand how well they are doing in the minds of the customer. Customers don’t always want to tell you what they really think. In Asia, research says here customers don’t want to be recorded saying something bad about a company–what research should you believe?
Anyway, I’ve not read this book but I am interested to learn if the measure quotient of his suggestions really work. If so, than all companies should use a version of that program and regularly track it, just as we do every other retail dashboard gauge.
I would like to add that in today’s state of affairs, it is not only the customers who should matter, but the employee at the front lines is key to the execution of the optimal customer experience.
While companies are slashing their workforces, are they paying any attention to the types of workers that are being hired and fired? Employee engagement is directly related to positive customer experiences and to not capitalize on your best employees and ensure they have the tools to execute your brand promise will leave both employees and customers out in the cold.
The current customer race will be won by business that empowers their employees at all levels to go above and beyond to ensure that every point of contact with the brand leaves a positive impression on the customer.