Meta Ray-Ban Smart Glasses
Photo by Dima Solomin on Unsplash | ©Daniel Xavier via Canva.com

November 20, 2024

Is Oprah Right About the Appeal of Meta’s Smart Glasses?

Following Google Glass’ widely covered failure, Meta has a hit with Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses, including landing a spot on Oprah Winfrey’s holiday gift guide this year.

“The gift of the season!” Winfrey exclaimed on OprahDaily.com. “I’ll be giving these to lots of folks this year. Ray-Ban and Meta’s newest glasses can tell you what you’re looking at in a new city, translate a menu from a foreign language, play music, snap photos, take a phone call, and more. The traveler, the techie, and the trendsetter will dive right in.”

Ray-Ban Meta glasses are basically ordinary glasses that come with a camera, speaker, and voice-command capabilities powered by AI, essentially avoiding the hassle of doing the same tasks with a mobile phone.

Meta proclaimed in a recent blog post, “Available in Wayfarer, Skyler, and Headliner frames in a range of color and lens options, Ray-Ban Meta glasses let you live in the moment and share it, hands-free. Be fully present while taking, sharing, and saving high-quality photos and videos. Take a voice or video call on the go so you can connect with your people without disconnecting from your world. Share your point of view by livestreaming to Facebook and Instagram. Play your favorite mix or listen to podcasts without losing the ambient sounds of your surroundings. And use your voice to interact with Meta AI, your smart assistant that can help you learn something new, create captions, and translate text on the fly.”

The generally positive reviews (well beyond Oprah) reflect a big shift in public opinion around smart glasses after the arrival of Google Glass ignited privacy concerns. Google’s eyewear was particularly called out for being able to surreptitiously record people, whether with video or audio, with wearers identified as “glassholes” for recording without permission. Other privacy and ethics concerns raised included being able to identify strangers in public using facial recognition.

The Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses come at a friendlier price — $299 for standard lenses, $329 for polarized lenses, and $379 for transition lenses that automatically darken in sunlight — versus the more tech-advanced Google Glass’ price tag that started at $1,500.

Another difference is Meta’s glasses have a more subtle design, which embraces the streetwear style of Ray-Ban compared to Google Glass’ robotic design. Prakhar Khanna wrote for ZDNET, “When you look at Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses, they look and feel like sunglasses instead of a gadget. That subtlety is a standout feature for me.”

Some also feel people nearly expect to be recorded nowadays in an increasingly Instagramable world. Philip Berne wrote in a column for TechRadar, “Soon, everyone will wear a camera on their face everywhere. So what? We’re used to it. In fact, smart glasses are going to be more polite, because I’ll have a shining light that lets you know I’m recording.”

Meta’s success is reportedly encouraging others, including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Samsung, to reinvest in the smart glass opportunity.

Also writing for TechRadar, Eric Hal Schwartz recently heralded that 2025 “will be the year of the AI smart glasses.” He wrote, “Unlike Google Glass, modern smart glasses are designed around easy access while not being distracting to people around you. Meta’s partnership with Ray-Ban, for example, offers a device that can take photos and videos, link you to the Meta AI assistant, and still look like stylish frames. Throw in features like real-time translation and health metrics, as showcased in the Solos AirGo 3 Smart Glasses, and the blending of eyewear and AI makes a lot of sense.”

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses recently received some negative press, however, after reports arrived that two Harvard students created a program for the smart glasses that enabled them to identify strangers in real-time, including their names and addresses.

After news came about about this program, Meta shared a statement with the New York Post: “Ray-Ban Meta glasses do not have facial recognition technology. From what we can see, these students are simply using publicly available facial recognition software on a computer that would work with photos taken on any camera, phone or recording device.”

The company continued, “Unlike most other devices, Ray-Ban Meta glasses have an LED light that indicates to others that the user is recording. This LED cannot be disabled by the user, and we introduced tamper detection technology to prevent users from covering up the capture LED.”

According to the two students, they don’t plan to release the program, which they claimed they developed to “highlight [the] significant privacy concerns” associated with the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses.

Discussion Questions

Are the next generation of smart glasses, including Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses, better positioned for wide adoption than Google Glass?

Do you see an uproar still developing over related privacy concerns?

Poll

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders

Oprah’s endorsement is certainly a boost to Meta and their Smart Glasses. I do think the technology is useful and has some really interesting applications. However, the adoption curve will be fascinating as I can see this meeting quite a lot of resistance among regular consumers from things like it being seen as gimmicky, a bit annoying, intrusive and so forth. I also think being able to test out and try the technology will be extremely important to boost interest. Quite how we deal with privacy concerns is a whole other matter that still hasn’t been adequately resolved.

Last edited 11 months ago by Neil Saunders
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

Clearly a “yes” answer to the second question makes likely a “no” answer to the first, so that’s really the question we need to answer first (and probably not just try to answer it in the negative by quoting fans…particularly potentially endorsing celebrities). As is my wont, I’m going to go middle-of-the-road here and predict they’ll be more successful than version 1.0, but not a breakout…awesome as the technology may be.

Doug Garnett

This certainly reduces my respect for Oprah as none of the tech glasses has delivered a useful value to a broad enough audience to be an Oprah pick. The mistake with these glasses has always been that they have exceptional highly targeted uses and almost no value for a general audience.

David Biernbaum

Simply say, “Hey Meta, take a photo/video” and the accessory will capture the content from your perspective…literally. Additionally, you can stream live video, make calls, and listen to music without headphones.

This technology is available as sunglasses, prescription glasses, and bluelights. I believe Oprah’s consumer influence has waned, and this is an innovative and appealing idea that doesn’t need Oprah to succeed.

Last edited 11 months ago by David Biernbaum
Georganne Bender
Georganne Bender

These glasses look pretty cool, but who can say if Oprah is right about them? In fact, who can say if Oprah, or any other celebrity for that matter, truly likes a product or is being paid to endorse it?

Allison McCabe

The fact that these are designed with proven, popular frames allows them to blend into the background, making experimenting with them less obvious and awkward. At the very least, Oprah’s gift list is getting some additional exposure due to this somewhat controversial choice. Truly a gift for someone who has everything. How many recipients will use them out in the wild remains to be seen.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary

I keep thinking there’s going to be a backlash against the Black Mirror future that comes with 24/7 connectivity. But, I’ve been wrong a lot about public sentiment lately.
I still think there are some serious headwinds about this technology that we haven’t solved yet. Privacy is at the top of the list. Not the wearer’s privacy mind you, the privacy of everyone around them. The camera in the locker room example.
Oprah’s endorsement will have an effect. She brought us Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz, so her credibility, in my mind, is evolving.

Shannon Flanagan
Shannon Flanagan

Yes better positioned for more people to try, but certainly, not for wide adoption. What privacy means to the consumer in the world of AI and tech such as this is currently clear as mud. My teenagers have said they’e resigned themselves to the reality that there really is no such thing. I’m much more curious about the progression of privacy expectations and laws than I am about tech sunglasses.

BrainTrust

"I still think there are some serious headwinds about this technology that we haven’t solved yet. Privacy is at the top of the list."
Avatar of Gary Sankary

Gary Sankary

Retail Industry Strategy, Esri


"These glasses look pretty cool, but who can say if Oprah is right? In fact, who can say if Oprah, or any other celebrity, truly likes a product or is being paid to endorse it?"
Avatar of Georganne Bender

Georganne Bender

Principal, KIZER & BENDER Speaking


"The fact that these are designed with proven, popular frames allows them to blend into the background, making experimenting with them less obvious and awkward."
Avatar of Allison McCabe

Allison McCabe

Director Retail Technology, enVista


Recent Discussions

More Discussions