
wolterke/Depositphotos.com
June 19, 2025
Is Goodwill Poised To Continue ‘Winning’ in a Shaky Market, or Are Erratic Prices Turning Off Shoppers?
There’s little doubt that Goodwill is among the first brands to come to mind when one thinks of resale or secondhand retailers. However, despite its status as a nonprofit business, common criticisms surrounding its regional partners’ pricing policies have also dogged Goodwill Industries for years, somewhat intensifying lately due to a combination of socioeconomic factors.
Retail Brew highlighted findings from a recent ThredUp resale report, which revealed that the U.S. secondhand apparel market grew by 14% last year, its strongest annual growth since 2021 and well ahead of the broader retail clothing market.
With established legacy apparel brands such as Nike struggling to keep pace with the broader industry — one which itself is exhibiting a sharp downturn in 2025, according to Earnest panel data — it seems that it’s not only off-price retailers that are reaping the rewards, but also secondhand sellers such as Goodwill.
That same Earnest data underscored spending statistics indicating that consumer spending at U.S. clothing and accessories stores in the U.S. had fallen by 3.9% year-over-year between Jan. 1 and March 23 of 2025, with the category having “emerged as the worst-performing major retail segment so far this year, highlighting continued pressure on discretionary spending,” as Fibre2Fashion relayed.
Goodwill COO Says Trade-Down Effect and Sustainability-Minded Consumers Keeping Goodwill in the Game
Goodwill Industry International COO David Eagles was quoted extensively on the subject of how Goodwill continues to see success in the U.S. market, despite broader issues plaguing the American retail sector.
First, Eagles noted that Goodwill managed to ring up nearly 300 million transactions across its 3,300 U.S. stores in 2024, while also receiving a record-setting ~120 million donations — alongside between $6 billion and $7 billion in retail revenue.
And when asked about what the company was doing to retain consumer attention in a challenging economy, the COO pointed to the trade-down effect as the primary driver of Goodwill’s current fortunes.
“No. 1 is the trade-down effect… as prices may increase, consumers [are] seeking value and knowing that they’re making a difference with their purchases,” Eagles said.
“The second piece is we do see probably higher demographic groups than you would think in the space looking for those treasure hunts,” he added.
Eagles then proceeded to zero in on younger consumers and their stated appetites for sustainable and environmentally conscious shopping, which secondhand stores typically notch in the pro column as part of their business models.
Goodwill Continues To Endure Criticism Over Erratic Pricing, but Do Customers Care Enough To Stop Shopping There?
On the other hand, critics of Goodwill and its operating practices frequently point to erratic, seemingly overpriced goods cropping up on store shelves — a public relations problem, particularly for a company that sources the bulk of its frontline products via donations.
In the opening of a 2024 Daily Dot article, writer Melody Heald captured the complaint succinctly.
“Goodwill used to sell discounted items. But in the last few years the company has been caught reselling merchandise for higher than its original value. A number of shoppers have posted about the phenomenon online,” Heald wrote, providing a few examples (a $6.99 TJ Maxx teapot selling for $7.37 at Goodwill, a $6 Target purse for $9.99, and a $3 Walmart clearance sweater for $6).
A litany of customer complaints was also attached to the Daily Dot piece, with some users signaling that they would be opting out of shopping at Goodwill moving forward.
A similar complaint was shared by Ben Koop, writing for Goshen College’s newspaper, The Record. Accusing Goodwill of “corporate greed” after claiming first-hand evidence of overpriced goods at the secondhand retailer, Koop continued to denounce the larger chains in the space at large.
“This is what’s going on: Large thrift chains, such as Goodwill and Value Village, have realized that customers of a generally higher income demographic are buying frequently and in large quantities from their stores,” Koop wrote.
“As a method of increasing profits (when the cost of inventory is virtually zero), they mark up products of good quality or of a particular brand that is likely to be sought after, knowing that the inflated cost, although still under the initial cost, will nonetheless be purchased by someone able to afford it,” he concluded.
Discussion Questions
Will Goodwill continue to see growth in the immediate future, despite prominent criticism over its product pricing? Why or why not?
Are criticisms of Goodwill’s pricing strategy based in reality? Will frustrated shoppers eager to highlight specific instances of perceived unfairness still spend at the thrift retailer regardless?
Will the trade-down effect evidenced by Goodwill (as well as other large low-cost retailers, such as Walmart) remain in play if/when the economy improves?
Poll
BrainTrust
Brian Numainville
Principal, The Feedback Group
Georganne Bender
Principal, KIZER & BENDER Speaking
David Biernbaum
Founder & President, David Biernbaum & Associates LLC
Recent Discussions







As the secondhand market continues to grow, Goodwill is in a solid place to capture some of that uplift. There is, however, a lot more competition from online platforms so Goodwill has to work somewhat harder to generate growth. Its main advantage is that it has very strong physical presence, which a lot of consumers like – especially for goods like homewares and furniture. Goodwill is also benefitting from a small, but sizable trend in flipping – buying old products, refurbishing them and selling them on for a profit.
Oh and as for pricing – yes, prices at Goodwill can be erratic and occasionally odd. However, they are usually very willing to negotiate and you can get discount coupons if you donate items.
As for this quote by Ben Koop:
“As a method of increasing profits (when the cost of inventory is virtually zero), they mark up products of good quality or of a particular brand that is likely to be sought after…”
Err, yes Ben, that’s the way the whole retail world tends to work. Things that are in demand attract a premium. What do you expect them to do, mark them down? Where’s my rolling eye emoji…
From a retail strategy perspective, Goodwill has established a strong market position, primarily due to its donation-based model and social mission. That creates consumer goodwill (pun intended) that traditional thrift retailers can’t replicate. However, pricing like a conventional retailer while maintaining a donation-based inventory is having your cake and eating it too. If Goodwill prices out the very communities it claims to serve, it’s essentially gentrifying thrift shopping, turning it into treasure hunting for middle-class consumers rather than necessity shopping for lower-income families.
Goodwill’s true competitive advantage is not the treasure hunt experience, but its near-zero inventory costs. The company has spent decades building donation infrastructure, fostering community relationships, and achieving tax-advantaged status. Goodwill’s social mission and trust factor are significant for its success; a for-profit organization
soliciting free inventory would face legitimate skepticism.
The biggest threat to Goodwill isn’t erratic pricing or replication of the business model but disintermediation. Why donate to Goodwill when you can sell directly on Facebook Marketplace, Poshmark, or OfferUp? Younger generations are increasingly considering the resale value over the donation value.
What continuance: this post is conspiculously lacking in any relevant numbers, beyond the PR fodder of “record setting”. (I bring this up because – and since this might be construed as gossip, I’ll put it as a parenthetical – I’ve heard Goodwill is beset by problems: facility closures, layoffs and rumors about ‘local vs. national” power struggles have made the local headlines.)
The dissatisfaction of shoppers with Goodwill’s pricing strategy may result in a decrease in customer loyalty and a shift to alternative thrift stores or online resale platforms. This could ultimately impact Goodwill’s sales and reputation in the long term. However, the convenience and accessibility of Goodwill locations might still attract some shoppers despite their grievances.
Goodwill will see continued growth because affordability is the most pronounced consumer value in 2025. Threats of tariffs and higher inflation have made goods from domestic thrift stores seem like a savvier choice than buying new imported items. Despite some pricing controversy, Goodwill makes goods more accessible and affordable — and that’s what matters to shoppers.
What’s fun at Goodwill is finding something of great value at a ridiculous price, like the Manolo Blanik Mary Jane’s (Carrie Bradshaw’s Urban Shoe Myth) I found for $9.99. Obviously, whoever marked them had no idea what they were. Bender 1, Goodwill 0.
Will Goodwill’s erratic pricing turn off shoppers? Some, but those seeking a sustainable bargain will carry on.
And there’s the key distinction. Goodwill and Value Village have shoppers who are willing to take time in the treasure hunt, confidently knowing they can find a bargain no matter erratic pricing.
Out of necessity for some and via a treasure hunt mentality for others, Goodwill will continue to do well. However, there is a much broader range of competition today versus when they began, so this is a competitive challenge to their future, at least in terms of more fragmentation of share.
Goodwill’s growth is dependent on two factors: the quantity, quality, and variety of donations they receive and resell onward, and shoppers interest in unique, sustainable, and/value-priced merchandise.
The pricing issue will work itself out as usual. If sales decline, they’ll review pricing. If items sell, they’ll continue their current practices.
The bigger risk for Goodwill is if enough donors feel it’s worth the effort to sell on their own. No donations. No Goodwill.