
ElectricEgg/Depositphotos.com
September 19, 2025
Will Forever 21 Be Able To Succeed as a Digital-First Retailer and Wholesaler?
Following its second bankruptcy in six years, which took place in March as Retail Dive senior reporter Daphne Howland noted, it appears that Forever 21 will be helmed by a number of discrete operators working in distinctly separate spaces — most notably, e-commerce operations in the United States.
On the U.S. e-commerce side, Unique Brands will be charged with managing Forever 21’s operations. Concerning the brand’s stateside women’s wholesale business, that falls to Mark Edwards Apparel, per Chain Store Age’s Marianne Wilson. Meanwhile, Kidz Concepts, zeroed in on trending apparel collections, will take point on the U.S. wholesale partnership concerning children’s apparel.
Authentic Brands Group — which has a stake in former Forever 21 owner and operator Catalyst brands through a joint venture with SHEIN and Simon Property Group — put Jarrod Weber, global president for sports and lifestyle, forward to offer remarks on the move.
“This marks a sensational new chapter for Forever 21 and underscores our commitment to meeting consumers where they are,” Weber said.
“By aligning with expert operators in digital commerce, wholesale and youth apparel, we are setting Forever 21 up for long-term relevance and success, delivering fast, accessible fashion to Millennial, Gen Z and future generations through the channels they trust and prefer,” he added.
Forever 21 Enters a Competitive Market, But Can it Make Inroads?
Given its two prior bankruptcies — and the fact that Authentic Brands Group CEO Jamie Salter termed his company’s buyout, alongside Simon Property Group and Brookfield, of Forever 21 out of bankruptcy as “probably the biggest mistake I made” in the recent past — rolling the dice on the fast-fashion brand’s ability to hold its own in a hyper-competitive e-comm apparel space seems a risky proposition.
There’s little chatter among consumers on social media platforms over the now-defunct brand — one dominant narrative points to a “vintage Forever 21” meme circulating which pokes fun of the brand’s lack of historical provenance, while a second thread highlights its forward-thinking usage of AI catwalk models in displaying product — but one thing does seem certain: The label does have some cultural cache to trade upon, whether positive or negative.
But with the suspension of the de minimis exemption due to order of the Trump administration, can Forever 21 return as a serious contender in the online apparel retail space? SHEIN, which worked with Forever 21 to little effect in 2023 and has at least some interest in seeing the brand succeed, and to a lesser extent, Temu, are facing headwinds in the U.S. market due to the closing of that loophole. Further, analyst post-mortem examinations of the major sticking points attached to Forever 21’s second bankruptcy may no longer be applicable.
“Forever 21’s decline is rooted in several key missteps that highlight traditional retailers’ challenges in today’s dynamic market,” said Sudip Mazumder, SVP of digital business consultancy Publicis Sapient, in June 2024, per Digital Commerce 360. “Their rapid expansion saddled them with high real estate costs as mall traffic dwindled and ecommerce boomed.”
“Forever 21’s ecommerce efforts lagged, with a less competitive online presence compared to digitally focused competitors,” Mazumder added.
That may no longer be the case, at least if the stars align.
In a March 2025 breakdown of not only Forever 21’s fate and fortunes, but of ultra-fast-fashion as a whole, Vogue cited Elizabeth L Cline, author and lecturer of fashion policy at Columbia University, on the subject.
“Ultra-fast fashion is alive and well, as evidenced by Shein and Temu’s extraordinary rise. But rising costs and geopolitics will likely push more players out of the market, leading to further consolidation. Meanwhile, middle of the road brands will continue to struggle to keep up with the frenzied pace, style and fickleness of social media,” Cline noted.
“These days, the future of fast fashion is being shaped less by conversations about quality or sustainability — and more by Gen Z’s appetite for constant content. As the pace accelerates and the players evolve, the industry’s future won’t be shaped by nostalgia or novelty — but by who can afford to keep up and who’s willing to look away,” she added.
With Temu and SHEIN being hampered by an ongoing trade headwind and Forever 21 being backed for a push by significant capital, the possibility presents itself that the brand may be able to recapture at least some, if not more, of its former station.
Discussion Questions
Will Forever 21’s play as a digital-first retailer and wholesaler see success? Why or why not?
How much interest do you believe consumers have in a revived Forever 21 brand? Have the bankruptcies and the exit from the physical market damaged the brand beyond repair?
Poll
BrainTrust
Nicholas Morine
Recent Discussions








What will it offer, that a dozen other more successful companies can’t?
Stiil thinking aren’t you? (and thinking…and thinking and…)
Forever 21’s huge stores were a financial drain on the business. So an operation that is digitally-focused may seem preferable. However, the reason the stores didn’t work is because the brand was weak, the offer was mediocre, and rivals were more compelling. Being online only does not remedy any of these things. Indeed, digitally-only brands struggle to stand out. Moreover, the economics of a fast fashion retailer online (with return and shipping costs, etc.) are not very compelling.
Forever 21’s wholesale fragmentation is strategically sound – different operators for different wholesale categories can optimize for their specific retail partnerships and buyer relationships. That’s sound business model diversification and not necessarily brand dilution. The real issue is whether the consumer-facing digital experience (managed by Unique Brands) can rebuild brand relevance when the underlying value proposition remains unclear. The wholesale success could actually subsidize and support better brand building on the consumer side.
The question is whether Forever 21 can use this breathing room to solve the harder problem: giving consumers a compelling reason to choose them over SHEIN, Zara, or other fast fashion options by capturing Gen Z/Millennial nostalgia equity and leveraging their AI-forward product presentation capabilities. Forever 21 can position itself as the “American fast fashion platform,” emphasizing cultural relevance, local trends, and social commerce integration.
Forever 21’s digital-first and wholesale model gives it a chance to shed the heavy costs of mall real estate and focus on more nimble operations, but success will depend on more than structure. The brand still has to prove it can deliver compelling fashion, strong value, and smooth digital experiences in a fast-fashion landscape dominated by SHEIN, Zara, and others. Without addressing its past weaknesses in product and brand perception, shifting channels alone won’t win back consumers.
There is still some residual recognition and nostalgia, particularly among Millennials and Gen Z who remember its heyday, which offers a base to build on. Yet the bankruptcies and store closures damaged trust and left Forever 21 associated with low quality and inconsistency. If the company leverages its new operating model to improve design, value, and customer experience, it could regain relevance — but if it simply replicates the old model online, digital alone won’t be enough to repair the brand.
Forever 21’s digital-first pivot may solve the real estate drag, but doesn’t fix the root cause of being a weak undifferentiated brand in a competitive market. Forever 21 needs to reinvent its value proposition and meaningfully connect with Gen Z and Millennials, capitalizing on whatever nostalgia is left and distinguishing itself with design, value, and experience.