ImageBase/Depositphotos.com
October 14, 2025
Will Targeting Micro-Influencers Maximize Reach for Gap Inc.?
Promising to move promises move beyond “transactional affiliate programs,” Gap Inc. has launched a new creator affiliate and advocacy platform to help influencers drive engagement and earn commission while steering their social media followers to the company’s four banner websites: Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic, and Athleta.
The program offers numerous potential stories to craft content-driven postings around, including early access to new releases, product seeding, and exclusive promos, “as well as content collaboration opportunities and the ability for creators and their content to be amplified across paid, social, and brand-owned channels.”
Newsletters and creator spotlights will also be included to support community building.
Gap noted that the platform launches as its Gap brand’s “Better in Denim” campaign, starring global girl group KATSEYE, became Gap’s most successful social media campaign to date, driving more than 600 million views and over 8 billion impressions in one month.
Gap Inc. also recently announced plans to expand its accessories and beauty assortments, introduced a Zac Posen’s GapStudio collection at the Gap chain, and announced an upcoming collaboration with American designer Anna Sui for Old Navy.
Damon Berger, head of digital engagement at Gap Inc., said, “By balancing creator convenience and empowerment with rich brand storytelling, this new program will position us to build closer relationships with creators, amplify their content across all our channels, and leverage data-driven insights to deliver greater impact at scale.”
Can Gap Leverage the Age of the Influencer, Despite Potential Market Maturity?
Influencer marketing is on the rise, with 69% of U.S. marketers planning to partner with more influencers this year, according to Sprout Social’s 2025 State of Influencer Marketing report. The research found influencers encourage 86% of customers to make at least one purchase a year, and inspire 49% to buy monthly. Content that drives purchases includes genuine reviews, 64%; discount codes, 55%; and multiple influencers posting about the same product (26%).
Modern Retail noted that similar creator platforms launched this year from Best Buy and Lowe’s “exhibit an evolution beyond affiliate links and toward more personalized shoppable content, measurability and new ways to compensate creators.”
Best Buy and Lowe’s both allow influencers to create customizable storefronts linked to each retailer’s website. Said Jennie Weber, CMO at Best Buy, “We’re excited to launch the Best Buy Creator program and empower creators to turn their passion and authenticity into a shoppable retail experience that’s fun, inspirational and convenient.”
Condé Nast, the parent of ‘Vogue, GQ, Wired, and other consumer titles, in September announced the planned launch of Vette, a platform that lets creators build their own e-commerce sites — using a marketplace model to avoid requiring affiliate links that send followers to purchase on brand and retailer sites.
Lisa Aiken, Vogue’s executive fashion director and Condé Nast’s SVP of commerce, told Vogue Business, “Affiliate is high friction. This will make it more seamless to find something on social media and then purchase it.”
Discussion Questions
Does Gap Inc.’s new creator affiliate and advocacy platform, and similar crowdsourced efforts from Best Buy and Lowe’s, mark an advancement over traditional influencer affiliate programs?
What are the pain points of commission-driven affiliate programs for both influencers and retailers?
Poll
Loading …BrainTrust
Neil Saunders
Managing Director, GlobalData
David Biernbaum
Founder & President, David Biernbaum & Associates LLC
Scott Benedict
Founder & CEO, Benedict Enterprises LLC
Recent Discussions
More Discussions
Which Tech Will Solve In-Store Inventory Woes?
Three major tech lineups are looking to solve retail inventory problems. Which is most suited?Will Ford’s New Retail Experience Deliver Results?
Ford is revamping its global dealership model, in terms of physical space and other aspects. Will…Will Target’s Rebalancing Act Solve its ‘Sloppier’ Stores Problem?
Target is making an operational move to take fulfillment duties away from certain stores. Will this…
In our recent youth research with Pacsun, the significance of brand and product discovery on social came out as being critical for younger generations. And, interestingly, influencers hold more sway here than celebrities or big names. Within this, micro-influencers are important because they are seen as authentic. So I’d say, as long as this is executed effectively, Gap is on the right track. Of course, none of this trumps having the right products and designs.
Gap Inc.’s roll-out of a centralized “creator affiliate and advocacy” program marks a meaningful evolution beyond traditional influencer affiliate models. Rather than simply paying for links and commissions, the program offers creators early access to drops, product gifting, content collaboration opportunities, brand-owned amplification and community elements—creating a deeper, more partner-centric experience that leans into authentic storytelling rather than pure transactions.
At the same time, commission-driven affiliate programs carry real pain points for both sides. For creators, the typical challenges include low margins per sale, oversaturation of affiliate links (which can dilute authenticity), and limited access to brand creative/support. For retailers, the issues include weak attribution models (did the influencer truly drive the sale?), margin erosion, brand-safe/content-safe concerns, and difficulty scaling beyond “discount code” mechanics. By shifting toward a hybrid advocacy/community model, Gap attempts to mitigate some of those drawbacks—offering richer creator incentives and a stronger connection to brand narrative.
In short: yes, Gap’s initiative does represent a step forward. It reflects the understanding that influencer-ecosystems must move beyond link-clicks and instead foster creator partnership, community, content amplification and data-driven measurement.
Influencers may struggle with inconsistent income due to fluctuating sales and commission rates. They also face the challenge of maintaining authenticity while promoting products, as excessive commercial content can alienate their audience. Additionally, influencers often deal with complex tracking systems that can make it difficult to accurately measure their performance and earnings.
Gap’s success was always at least as much about marketing as it was about product. Clever to brilliant marketing on sometimes very straightforward product. So yes, this move into today’s marketing paradigm makes abundant sense.
This platform represents a meaningful tactical improvement in the mechanics of creator programs. Still, it doesn’t resolve the strategic contradiction between Gap’s anti-promotional, storytelling, brand positioning, and its reliance on discount-driven influencer commerce. If Gap is seeking to generate buzz, this will do so; however, the test is whether, in 18 months, Gap has built a sustainable competitive advantage or created a more complex, harder-to-manage promotional channel that still depends on the very tactics Richard Dickson claims the company is moving away from.