
wolterke/Depositphotos.com
October 29, 2025
Are Commissaries an Up-and-Coming C-Store Secret Weapon?
It may come as little surprise that convenience stores are increasingly relying on unique differentiators in a crowded market as options proliferate — furthermore, when it comes to differentiators, food and snack items appear to be topping the list.
Per an April report issued by Restaurant Business, the outlet’s Jonathan Maze highlighted that many restaurants — from QSRs to casual — were likely losing market share to c-stores on the food front.
“Where did the nation’s fast-food customers go last year when they opted against the drive-thru? One bet: They went to the gas station. Foodservice sales, most of which is prepared food, accounted for 28.7% of in-store sales at convenience stores last year, according to the National Association of Convenience Stores, or NACS,” Maze wrote.
“They represent a bigger chunk of their profits: Foodservice sales accounted for nearly 40% of in-store gross margin dollars. Prepared food accounted for more than two-thirds of convenience stores’ foodservice sales last year,” he added.
And now, with a new report from C-Store Dive’s Amanda Baltazar, it appears that some major convenience store chains are expanding their supply chain operations to include commissaries — enabling each company to control each aspect of production to ensure consistency and fresh delivery to every location.
“Commissaries are a boon to convenience store chains large enough to warrant them. They bring consistency and ensure quality. Food safety standards can be stringently enforced. The supply chain is consistent. Perhaps most important, they give convenience retailers the flexibility to update and evolve their food offerings,” Baltazar stated, noting that Kwik Trip, Weigel’s, and EG America had all invested in the commissary model.
Commissaries for C-Stores: Expensive, But Worth It?
It’s almost certainly a major expense line to add a commissary, or several, to the balance sheet when considering a c-store chain’s operations, but that expense appeared to be justified by representatives of the three aforementioned chains.
“We can buy in bulk because we’re making [items] for 85 stores out of one commissary,” said Beth Hoffer, vice president of foodservice for Weigel’s. “This also means we can upgrade ingredients for better quality.” Weigel’s opened its 110,000-square-foot facility in Loudon, Tennessee, earlier this year, in April.
Meanwhile, Kwik Trip has spent millions — $151 million most recently — expanding its La Crosse, Wisconsin, commissary facility to its current footprint measuring 140 acres. That commissary provides food production for Kwik Trip’s more than 850 stores. On premises: a bakery, which is important as it “really supplements our foodservice program because pretty much everything is on one of our buns,” per one exec; a beverage and ice cream section which also serves as a production hub for its own plastic bottles; a refrigerated kitchen playing host to production lines for pizza, fried chicken, sandwiches, and meat snacks; and a separate area charged with issuing forth a variety of sweet treats to stock its store shelves.
However, “Because Kwik Trip’s production is so high, a lot of its equipment is custom made,” Baltazar underscored, also noting that blast freezers, ovens, refrigerated loading docks, conveyor belts, metal or foreign object-scanning machines, labor, and other expenses were common in the commissary business.
Concerning EG America’s 43,000-square-foot commissary in Westborough, Massachusetts, Nathan Bartlett — the company’s director of culinary operations — outlined the positives.
“This streamlines operations and gives us the opportunity to supervise large scale production in a very small space. One person can watch 100 people and everything is made with the same level of food safety, quality and consistency. We can reduce labor costs, bring in product in bulk and leverage some economies of scale,” Bartlett said of the facility, which provides 105,000 food items to its stores. About 1,400 locations receive frozen items, while ~600 stores receive fresh items four times weekly.
Discussion Questions
Should more c-stores be making significant investments in commissaries to bring their food service in-house? Why or why not? What dangers are in play?
Are there any potential downsides to the commissary model adopted by the three convenience store chains mentioned? What brands may wish to avoid this model?
Poll
BrainTrust
Cathy Hotka
Principal, Cathy Hotka & Associates
Brad Halverson
Principal, Clearbrand CX
Shep Hyken
Chief Amazement Officer, Shepard Presentations, LLC
Recent Discussions







Commissaries are not new. Many retailers, including Erewhon, use them to produce food for their stores. There are two main advantages. The first is control – particularly the ability to ensure quality standards, which is important for c-stores looking to raise their game in food and foodservice. The second is reducing costs through economies of scale and efficiency; however, this only really applies to c-stores with sufficient scale and a reasonably concentrated geographical footprint. So, I am not sure about a secret weapon, but this is definitely a strategic advantage for some chains.
In the 1980s-90s, SuperAmerica had a very strong fresh program, with “SuperMom’s Bakery” located centrally in the Twin Cities. The strength of delivery was enough to piggyback an overnight small-package locker delivery operation – far in advance of today’s Amazon delivery lockers but very similar to what the Japanese konbini have been doing. After the acquisition by Ashland, then Speedway, all that investment was abandoned and there really isn’t a fresh program at the Speedway stores up here; the stores are dingy and dated. Here’s hoping 7-Eleven actually applies some of their .JP knowhow to turn the operation around – it’s about five miles to my closest Kwik Trip, in the wrong direction & I’m not going that far out of my way for their donuts.
Some C-stores have outstanding food; Royal Farms’ outstanding fried chicken comes to mind. Heck, look at Buc-ee’s. Chains that can operate at this high level should double down…it’s working.
I believe that for certain mid- to large-scale convenience-store operators, the decision to invest in a dedicated commissary can be a strategically valid lever for elevating their food-service proposition — provided the size, geography, and operational readiness align. As the C‑Store Dive article notes, chains such as Kwik Trip, Weigel’s Food Stores, and EG America are using their own commissaries to drive consistency, quality, food-safety compliance, and give themselves the flexibility to refresh menus faster.
The upside: better control of supply, cost leverage through bulk production, improved food-service margins (in many cases, foodservice often contributes a disproportionate share of gross margin dollars) — all of which align with the omnichannel/food-service-first shopper orientation that is increasingly relevant for C-stores.
However, the model is far from universally appropriate. The risks are substantial: the capital investment and ongoing fixed-cost commitment of building and running a commissary with blast freezers, ovens, conveyor systems, logistics refrigeration, labour, quality controls, etc., can be massive — as Kwik Trip’s multi-million-dollar facility demonstrates.
If the store scale is insufficient, or the footprint too dispersed, you can end up with high fixed costs per unit, under‐utilized capacity, and logistical complexity that eats margin rather than enhancing it. Additionally, if a brand lacks strong internal operations and food‐service culture, it may struggle with execution, menu innovation or food-safety risk escalation (which in turn can damage brand reputation). Thus, brands with a smaller scale, very scattered geography or a low-complexity food mix may wish to avoid or at least defer the commissary model in favour of third-party co-packing, shared regional hubs, or other hybrid models.
A major upside for C-Stores to have their own commissary are sales and brand image improvements from increased freshness, quality control, and unique offerings they can’t get from suppliers. The other is operational efficiencies and gross margin improvements so store locations can focus on customer service.
But commissaries come with a serious ROI decision to be made carefully, especially for smaller and mid-size C-stores. Beyond plant and equipment costs, a dedicated labor force is operating around the clock, which means store locations must accept and sell food volumes coming from the kitchen. The danger comes in stores cutting back on orders, which will quickly eat into budgeted efficiencies and margins, putting both the viability of the commissary and the parent business in question.
If a c-store (or any other food retailer) sees the benefit of having a commissary to prepare food for their stores, and they are big enough to support it, I don’t see the danger. This allows them to scale more items, control the quality, and create a better customer experience.
This reminds me of the classic “asset-light vs. asset-heavy” debate in airlines and hotels. Southwest and Marriott proved you could win with owned assets, but they also showed you need relentless operational discipline and the scale to justify it. For c-stores, that threshold appears to be somewhere north of 500-600 stores in a concentrated geography. The mid-sized c-store chains trying to copy this playbook might be making the same mistake as regional airlines buying planes — too much fixed cost, not enough volume to cover it. Adding a commissary increases entry and exit barriers and creates strategic lock-in that may not be easy to retrofit when consumer preferences change.
Success doesn’t come from having commissaries; it starts with operational excellence that justifies them. They are massive operational amplifiers: If you’re mediocre at food execution, a commissary will make you expensively mediocre at scale.
Commissaries provide an advantage for those who are able to benefit from the scale by providing a more consistent product and more reliable quality. Absolutely can be a benefit to larger organizations if done well.