Sources: Pizza Hut, Staples, Whole Foods
A new university study finds people will more readily use a chatbot if they perceive it to be friendly and competent and less so if it projects overconfidence and arrogance. The challenge, the authors say, is finding the right balance.
Across three studies with 300 participants in the U.S., researchers tested reactions to AI-bots with the same underlying functionality but different descriptions.
Among the findings:
- Low-competence descriptions (e.g., “this agent is like a toddler”) led to increases in perceived usability, intention to adopt and desire to cooperate relative to high-competence descriptions (e.g., “this agent is trained like a professional”).
- People are more likely to cooperate with and help an agent that projects higher warmth (e.g., “good-natured” or “sincere”).
- Descriptions “are powerful,” helping drive user adoption and engagement with chatbots.
- How to Build a Likable Chatbot – Stanford University
- Conceptual Metaphors Impact Perceptions of Human-AI Collaboration – ACM (Association For Computing Machinery)
- Consumers Like Chatbots to Be Smart—but Not Too Smart – The Wall Street Journal
- The Alexa Personality – Amazon Alexa Developer
- Alexa and Google Assistant are developing personalities – CNET
- Prepare for the voice revolution – PWC
- Voice Trends & Statistics: What Designers Need to Know About the New Tech Boom – Adobe
- Does humanizing virtual assistants undermine consumer privacy? – RetailWire
- COVID-19 may push retailers to use voice assistants instead of touch screens – RetailWire
