
©IGphotography via Canva.com
February 10, 2025
The Future of the American B Mall (and Other Grades) Remains in Flux as Fortunes Diverge
The American mall experience has been something of a cultural touchstone since the opening of the first “contemporary, enclosed suburban shopping mall” experience in 1956, as Atlas Obscura recorded. The Southdale Shopping Center of Edina, Minnesota, would usher in the heyday of the American mall experience in the ’70s, ’80s, and ’90s before the once-popular hangout and all-inclusive shopping experience that it represented began to show its age, falling somewhat out of favor.
Now, the fate of the American retail mall is in flux, according to Retail Dive. Those graded or classified as top-notch malls (achieving an A ranking) are performing well, while those in the lower B’s, C’s, and D’s are headed toward total reformation or restructuring.
Rudolph Milian, president and CEO of retail consultant Woodcliff Realty Advisors, described the ranking system in an email to CoStar News.
Rankings are “based on a few factors such as tenant mix, location, trade area dominance, but the most important factor is average sales per square foot,” he said.
But what fate awaits those high-performing B’s, or B+ malls?
US Malls Rated A, B+ See Increased Rents and Occupancy, While C-Class Malls and Below Face Repurposing
Citing data from Green Street analysts, Retail Dive indicated that there was a stark divergence in terms of operational success concerning A malls, B+ malls, B malls, and those lagging behind.
A malls, for example, rose 2.4% to 5.5% (in terms of the aforementioned effective rents and occupancy) last year. B+ malls ticked upward more modestly, by 0.3% — but no other grade made the cut in terms of a positive trend.
B-graded malls tumbled by 2.5%, and B-minus-ranked malls fell by 5%. Even worse, C-class malls plummeted by 6.5% to 8%. Effectively, two very different futures lie in store for existing malls nationwide, and fortunes depend almost entirely on current classification and/or performance.
“The retail prospects for most malls graded ‘B-’ or below are generally dire; many will be repurposed with another real estate use over the next decade,” Green Street analysts indicated.
This is a story somewhat reinforced by a 2022 Modern Retail report, which suggested that some C-class malls were seeing vacancy rates as high as 30%.
Multiple suggestions were on offer as to how to revitalize these ailing shopping centers: adding experiential businesses that are trending, like ax throwing or pickleball; dividing vacant anchor stores into smaller footprints to allow for independent or small businesses or chains to take up tenancy; inviting service-based businesses such as gyms or dental clinics to open up shop; or finally, redeveloping them into residential or commercial real estate opportunities.
Both sources spoke to the deep investments necessary to revitalize a B-plus mall into a true A-class performer.
Sandy Jacobson, partner with real estate firm Allen Matkins, was cited by Modern Retail on the subject, suggesting that targeted investments after a deep case study on individual properties can lead to a new lease on life for certain shopping centers.
“A lot of times, they’re taking this opportunity to rehab their center, maybe making it from a C to B or a B to an A-, and get new tenants in there,” Matkins said, despite the capital expenditures such a rehabilitation may cost.
Meanwhile, Anjee Solanki — national director of retail services at Colliers — told Retail Dive that Simon Property Group (the largest owner of shopping malls in the United States) was participating in exactly this type of targeted investment behavior.
“Given the limited space availability in A Malls, landlords have a prime opportunity to elevate the leasing efforts in B Malls… landlords see value in strategic redevelopments rather than widespread overhauls” Solanki said.
However, cap rates at 13% to 17% for B malls, compared to 5.5% for top-tier A malls, per Solanki, “[indicates] higher risk and return expectations.”
“With department store vacancies increasing and mall owners focusing on diversified revenue streams, the investment needed to reposition these assets is substantial,” she added.
Upgrading a B+ Mall to an A Mall Is Possible, Experts Suggest
But what about the B+ mall, wedged between the top tier of American shopping centers seemingly destined for success and a massive cohort of so-called “dead” or dying malls that are nearly certain to be repurposed into sprawling real estate complexes — maybe with a small retail footprint, food court, and professional care offices if they’re lucky?
“It is not difficult to turn a B+ mall into an A- mall through redevelopment, re-leasing, consumer marketing, etc.,” Milian said.
“Simon, with its very powerful leasing resources, certainly has the ability to identify and attract highly productive retailers to replace underperforming retailers through lease expiration,” Milian added.
Milian went on to indicate that a B+ mall store could also transition to an A-class mall simply by buying out underperforming or unwanted tenants, “[replacing] them with more productive tenants that will pay higher rents. Achieving better sales also pushes demand from the most desirable retailers. This alone can turn a B+ mall into a Class A- mall,” he concluded.
Solanki also weighed in on the issue when pressed by CoStar News, writing in an email that each particular location demanded deep examination.
“Upgrading B malls can drive foot traffic, but success depends on strategic investment, tenant mix, and location,” Solanki wrote.
“While experiential retail, mixed-use elements, and better merchandising can revitalize some properties, the costs are significant, and not all struggling malls will survive in their current form. With department stores continuing to decline, we’re seeing a shift toward grocery, off-price, and entertainment anchors, but e-commerce and consumer spending pressures remain challenges. Selective redevelopments that integrate residential, entertainment, and lifestyle components have the best chance of long-term success,” she concluded.
Discussion Questions
Do you believe the divide is as stark as analysts project, and that only A-class and B-plus malls stand a chance of survival? Why or why not?
What can struggling malls do to rekindle interest in visiting? Have any brands mastered a move into so-called “dead malls” to great effect?
Is the anchor store truly a dated concept to be relegated to history? Or are local demographics and national ad campaigns effective in making the anchor store relevant again?
Poll
BrainTrust
Carol Spieckerman
President, Spieckerman Retail
Sarah Pelton
Partner, Cambridge Retail Advisors
Neil Saunders
Managing Director, GlobalData
Recent Discussions







The headline is that vacancy rates remain low in retail, and there is relatively little new space in the pipeline. This presents something of an opportunity for B malls. However, the extent of the opportunity varies enormously by individual location. There are some B malls that, with a few new stores and a bit of sprucing up, can find success. There are others on a downward spiral that will be tough to revive. And the elephant in the room is the ongoing closure of department stores like Macy’s. These occupy huge spaces which are hard to fill, and when they disappear, they weaken the whole ecosystem of the mall. In some cases, redevelopment into mixed-use schemes might be the most viable option. This was done in the case of Paradise Valley Mall in Arizona, which is now a vibrant mixed-used center called PV Phoenix.
I don’t think the divide is 100% vaild, but, yes, the future is very limited for those out of the upper tier(s). I didn’t read the paper, so I’m reluctant to criticize, but I sense a certain confusion of “cause and effect” here; successful malls are regularly updated and have strong tenants, but does that mean if you spend oodles of money on upgrades and recruit strong(er) tenants you’ll be successful? Or will it fail because the forces that made the mall weak in the first place remain ? Well, that’s really the $500/sq ft question, isn’t it?
The entire premise of a mall is being transformed and (literally) turned inside out. Major department stores no longer “anchor” malls as the likes of Macy’s pare down and as mall-based specialty chains seek diversification. Entertainment and dining are the new draws and outward-facing multi-use concepts are replacing the obscured containers of the past. New partnership and acquisition models are populating properties based on developer/brand hookups. Like many things in retail, malls are by no means dead, but they will definitely be different. A and B+ malls are ripe for doable upgrades. C malls will fade into obscurity.
Regional malls are experiencing a “correction” where some of the “A” and “B+” malls are thriving, while the B, C, and D malls are becoming increasingly vacant. In many large markets, the one or two “A” and “B+” malls are the only ones that are still open, but that is the appropriate correction.
No surprise that e-commerce, notably Amazon, but also retailer’s own digital options, has replaced the market for medium sized indoor malls. Furthermore, Millennials are generally unenthusiastic about mall shopping. At least for “A” malls, Gen Z appears to be more interested.
In addition, many department store chains have either disappeared or shrunk. The “A” malls still have the remaining anchor stores, but the “B” and below malls were unable to maintain their big stores.
In suburban St. Louis, Chesterfield Mall is being torn down and replaced by a brand new “downtown” project right on the same property. I predict that will be a trend that increases, if it hasn’t already.
Missing in this piece- the factors that drive success in these malls. It’s no longer the anchor stores and the food court. Today, the most successful malls understand they need to be more of a food and entertainment destination; shoppertainment is a real thing. And so is destructive capitalism.
The demise of department stores is a story three decades in the making. Three decades. So yes, mall anchor stores are a dated concept. Are “A” and “B” malls surviving because of the anchors? No. They are surviving because they enjoy population density and ongoing investment and innovation. The anchors are surviving because the malls are surviving. It’s not because the anchors have done anything brilliant in the last decade. Quite the opposite. And in markets below a certain level of population density, where ecommerce and TJX+ have siphoned off significant $$$, the math for most malls just doesn’t work any longer. It’s a classic evolutionary tale that took waaaaaay too long to notice and to respond to.
So mall anchors are trying to reinvent themselves at an agonizingly slow pace. Traffic at “A” and “B” malls is buying them a little time to accomplish that. And they will pull out of “C” malls as fast as lease agreements allow. But wouldn’t it be great to see Macy’s and JCP invent a version of themselves that is one third to one half their legacy size? Smaller and regionalized? And wouldn’t it be great to see Best Buy take on a role as a mall anchor? And wouldn’t it be great to see grocery stores take on a role as a mall anchor? (A VERY common occurrence in China.) And wouldn’t it be great if……
B malls are in an interesting position – not necessarily struggling, but not exactly thriving either. Success isn’t just about new tenants or renovations; it’s about rethinking how malls fit into people’s lives today. The best retail spaces make shopping easy, engaging, and worth the trip. Malls that find the right mix of convenience and experience will be the ones that continue to attract customers.
Omnicommerce retailers must optimize their mall presence by aligning store locations with online sales and return patterns. As more consumers buy online, many physical stores now serve primarily as return centers rather than sales drivers. Forward-thinking retailers are using data to evaluate which locations add real value and which should be consolidated or repurposed.
This trend varies by mall tier. A malls remain strong hubs for both sales and returns, while B and C malls are seeing an increasing share of foot traffic driven by returns rather than new purchases. Many retailers are closing stores in these malls, as the cost of maintaining them outweighs their value. D malls, already in decline, face even greater vacancies as retailers shift toward locations with stronger omnichannel integration. To stay competitive, brands must rethink their physical footprint and ensure their stores complement—not just support—the online experience.
The 80’s were a long time ago and regardless of how nice the mall is the idea of “just going” to a mall is, well, at least 30 years long in the tooth. Some will survive, sure, but the mall as a cultural phenomenon is over. Cooked. Done.
B malls have a chance if they can attract tenants that make sense for the end consumer in the market assuming there haven’t been huge migration shifts. Leasing folks are using data, storytelling and community to do placemaking – potentially turning some places into third places (aka not retail). C and D malls will become something else – also not an easy feat. The definition of anchors are changing as well, but as this group knows department stores are here to stay, I think we all got up in arms over that question awhile back. We are seeing lots of other kinds of retail and uses come in to take their place and the use of pads for Dick’s sporting good concepts to pickle ball (sorry someone had to say it : )
I think the gap between thriving and failing malls is undeniable. A-class and B+ malls succeed because they’ve evolved, while lower-tier malls are fading due to outdated models.
If a mall isn’t offering unique experiences or a reason to visit, it won’t survive. The traditional anchor store isn’t completely dead, but it can’t carry a mall anymore because people want variety, entertainment, and convenience.
Some brands, like Target, have found ways to make dead malls work, but that’s the exception. For rest, if struggling malls don’t rethink their purpose, they’re just waiting for the inevitable.