
iStock.com/Georgii Boronin
October 25, 2024
Is Ad Fatigue Getting Worse?
A new survey from AD-ID, the universal ad indexing system, reveals that ad fatigue is influencing consumer behavior, with 61% of U.S. adults reporting they are less likely to buy products or use services from companies that show the same advertisements repeatedly.
The survey of over 2,000 U.S. adults also found that almost half (49%) have decided not to purchase a product from a brand when they see the ads too often. Of the respondents, half indicated that encountering the same ads repeatedly makes them annoyed. Among demographics, adults under 55, men, parents with children under 18, and adults living with children were significantly more likely to express frustration with repetitive advertising.
On the positive side, the poll found that 76% prefer ads that align with their interests, and 63% acknowledged making purchases based on ads that introduced them to previously unknown products or services. The findings suggest that, while there is a point where ad repetition becomes counterproductive, strategically tailored ads still have the power to engage and influence consumer decisions.
“That will be the next step — knowing how many times is too many,” Nada Bradbury, CEO of AD-ID, a collaboration between the American Association of Advertising Agencies (AAAA) and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), told MediaPost. “What I do know is seeing the same ad two or three times in a row is too many. You can’t keep showing the same ad and expect a positive response. They must be interspersed, and I think we are failing our clients if we can’t control that.”
Beyond television ads, a recent survey of about 500 UK online shoppers conducted by online marketplace vendor Capterra found 91% agreeing they see too many ads on social media. In response, over a third (37%) have blocked specific advertising and 35% have unfollowed a brand in the past 12 months.
Ad fatigue has been a chronic problem, with one oft-cited solution calling for marketers to vary their messages and media. Mark Addicks, the retired chief marketing officer for General Mills, told the Wall Street Journal in 2007, “You can use the same piece of creative work in so many different ways.”
In a column for Adweek, Leslie Licano, co-founder of Beyond Fifteen Communications, suggested shifting to a brand awareness campaign or one focusing on driving clicks to a blog showcasing products rather than a continual hard-sell approach. She said, “Overtly selling is okay sometimes and in certain stages of the customer journey, but if every ad is a hard sell, the target will start to tune you out.”
Other suggestions include regularly monitoring performance to detect signs of ad fatigue as well as personalizing whenever possible. Sabrina Rabini, paid media manager at Betsson Group, told InterGame, “Personalized ads featuring in-game rewards or tailored experiences resonate more with customers and reduce the monotony that is standard practice nowadays in PPC [pay for click] advertising.”
A survey of 450 U.S. adults last year from retention automation platform Optimove found that 79% of respondents unsubscribed from at least one retail brand in the previous three months — and 61% from three or more retail brands — due to too many marketing messages. When asked which channel was most irritating when they were “bombarded by marketing messages,” text messages and email were tied as the most irritating at 39% each.
“Marketers still erroneously believe that more messages will deliver more results,” said Pini Yakuel, CEO of Optimove. “In fact, less is more. Fewer right messages at the right time will probably deliver equal or better results.”
Discussion Questions
How do you know whether ad frequency is helping consumers connect with the messages in ads versus annoying them?
Why hasn’t ad fatigue been solved?
What’s your advice on reducing or overcoming ad fatigue?
Poll
BrainTrust
Dick Seesel
Principal, Retailing In Focus LLC
Georganne Bender
Principal, KIZER & BENDER Speaking
Doug Garnett
President, Protonik
Recent Discussions







Seeing an ad over and over again, as often happens on social media, is extremely annoying and it can be damaging to a brand. My general sense is that this happening more nowadays. That said, this is also a function of relevance. Seeing a relevant ad for a brand that you like is more acceptable than seeing something random that you’re not in the market to buy. So appropriate targeting plays as much of a role as frequency here.
Why hasn’t ad fatigue been “solved”? Well, because we’re still working on that World Peace thing (and look at how unexpectedly difficult that has turned out)
I think we’re dealing with something of a fallacy of composition issue here: ads are run repeatedly to reach a broad audience, not (so much) to reach the same people repeatedly. This was an unavoidable situation for the tradtional media of mass advertising – TV and radio – but I’m not as sure about the internet (the article was a little vague, but seems to imply that’s mostly what’s being discussed); I agree it’s somewhat surprising algorithms can’t be more personalized to avoid repetition, but the technology is still new…and marketing habits are very old; the result, unfortunately, is a scattershot approach that doesn’t take advantage of what’s possible.
Streaming, though? Literally the same two or three ads every 15 minutes, sometimes not even in *any* of the languages we speak at home, and almost never relevant.
I definitely have ad fatigue. Where can I sign up to get rid of them (including the 19 I had to close before I could post this comment, and the never ending supply from T*mu)? I’m willing to pay. Maybe.
Seriously, online ads are out of control. And I know I am not alone when I say I am tired of seeing the same ads over and over and OVER. Consumers are x-ing out, blocking, and deleting ads as fast as they appear, but like gremlins, they keep on coming back. (Google it.) You’d think by this time we’d have figured it out.
You are not alone, although full disclosure I use ad blockers and pay for ad free streams, so I actually don’t see many ads. But even live sports, the only channel I still endure advertising, I see the same ones over and over, and honestly, never buy from any of the ads I see, even Geico Ads (One of the few I like). .
This issue is all a bit ironic. Consumers are quite tired of being pestered online. Why online? It’s the place where repetition and following and ad snooping is most rampant. Yet the digerati a couple of decades ago sold their wares with an idea of a utopian ad-free world. It is allowable to be grumpy about that lie.
we must NOT, though, embrace this mythology of more focused ads that consumers want. In surveys, consumers want what advertisers cannot EVER deliver – ads which are just right for that moment in consumer life. Our interests change so rapidly it is not possible. Yet, ad agencies and social media outlets have made tremendous profit misleading companies into such targeting mythology. We need to return to many of the practices of the old days – finding one truly meaningful ad which appeals to the vast majority of our customers and run it regularly without pestering possible customers.
I agree with the essence of your post – critiquing the current state of digital advertising landscape in which promises of broad-scale, hyper-personalization have not come to fruition – up until the notion that advertisers will never be able to deliver the right add, to the right person at the right time. The proliferation and reduced cost of creation/access to interaction modalities will lead martech to levels of targeting precision that was unimaginable just a few years ago.
The repetition of ads on social media can be annoying, but self-control is easier to achieve than live television. Ad loads, or the number of commercials shown per hour on television, are at or approaching all-time highs across a slew of broadcast and cable networks.
Some cult-followed specialty programs, particularly those on non-mainstream channels, such as Reelz, Food Network, METV, Travel Channel, Weather Channel, etc., might have only a few advertisers repeating the same obnoxious advertisement tens or twenty times from beginning to end.
Low budget advertisers are most likely to run repetitive ads. A few of my unfavorite examples – – a spray deodorizer for pets, a particular gutter filter, a guy who sells pillows, a 3D rear view mirror, an extended car warranty service, a diet plan, a sports gambling app, nighttime sunglasses, and used car shopping app ad with another obnoxious loud voice, with shock value, to hold our attention.
There are a lot of low quality ads that are very loud with the spokesman screaming at us. These are often low budget, quite unprofessional, way too long, with just one version, and even worse, the product name is repeated umpteen times. Armature advertisers mistakenly believe that repetition of the product name, often being screamed, is the magic formula. It’s not.
According to research, these low-budget repetitive ads do not perform as well as more versatile campaigns spread out evenly.
Asking this question a week before a national election, yes I’m particularly hostile to adverts at the moment. Political ads aside, television seems to be dominated by ads for pharmaceuticals and online betting sites, neither of which are relevant to me, or I suspect, to most viewers, so yes, seeing those ads over and over again is highly annoying. For digital advertising, which I don’t see a ton of, I run ad blockers; I find them so suspect and sketchy that I have never, yes, read that right, never clicked on one. That said, show me a funny ad and refrain from hitting the mute or fast-forwarding. At least the first few dozen times.
Online ads are presumed to do a better job targeting audiences than broadcast ads on local and network TV, yet they are all frequently guilty of overkill. Part of the secret sauce of successful marketers like Geico is their ability to keep the “creative” fresh while hammering home the desired messaging. Constant repetition to create more impressions is not by itself a winning strategy.
As to ad fatigue, don’t get me started on swing state political advertising! I live in Wisconsin, and you can imagine what it’s like to turn on the TV to watch the local news. Ad teams on both sides of the aisle are guilty of overusing the dark, scary visual style that we’ve all seen — when other marketers have long known that upbeat and even humorous sells product.
First of all, just because I am on a site does not mean that I want to be deluged with banner ads about that site, served up over and over and over again. In fact it just annoys me. So whoever thinks that is clever has really just illustrated how tone deaf so much of what passes for “marketing” is. Second, there is hardly anywhere to hide any more, from Gas Station TV (today’s word is “annoying” and how about that rock band that is going on tour again…presented at ear splitting decibels of sound-you even hear it if you get back in the car!) to ads in store to ads shown while you are in a public restroom.
Enough. Saturation does NOT equal branding, and does not lead to a purchase. For all of the intelligence chasing the elusive consumer, it seems to me that we are still back in the dark ages where the marketing leader states “I know 50% of our budget is working, I just do not know which 50%”.
Ad fatigue and over-saturation have long been issues for marketers, reiterating the importance of closely monitoring campaign performance. Too often, brands rely on a “set it and forget it” strategy, prioritizing vanity metrics such as views and impressions.
Like shopping expectations, consumers want personalized ads relevant to their purchasing preferences and habits. It’s time for marketers to move beyond broad campaigns with vast reach and focus on micro-campaigns that leverage AI to target highly tailored audiences.