DISCUSSION

Monsanto's Biotech Traits Get Nod for Increased Acreage

Written by Guest contributor
Regulatory approvals, renewals, and increased acreage of Monsanto Company's agricultural biotechnology traits in 2001 signal a growing acceptance of the technology and a broader recognition of its benefits, says Monsanto's Chief Technology Officer, Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D. The number of acres planted with biotechnology traits developed by Monsanto globally increased approximately 14 percent to 118 million acres (48 million hectares) in 2001. In the U.S., where the benefits of this technology are typically first introduced, acreage for Monsanto's biotechnology-enhanced traits rose by 17 percent in 2001 to more than 84 million acres (34 million hectares). According to Clive James, chairman of International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), the number of farmers planting biotech crops will continue to grow in 2002, particularly in developing countries.

Moderator Comment: Is there a growing acceptance of biotechnology-enhanced foods by consumers?

Mr. Fraley may very well be correct that there is an increased acceptance of biotechnology enhancement by farmers and regulators. We do not have quantitative data to disprove this opinion. How well these groups accept the technology probably is not really the point anyway.

We can not help thinking back, however, to when Monsanto was looking to promote bovine Somatotropin bST otherwise know as bGH. Monsanto's position (and most of the scientific community) was that the milk from cows given bST was exactly the same as those not given the hormone.

Various groups jumped up and protested. Soon chains were posting signs that they were not accepting milk from dairies that got milk from cows given bST. It also did not help that there was no shortage of milk and the need for an increased supply was not evident to many.

Some small farmer groups argued against the use of bST. They feared being put at a competitive disadvantage with larger farms. There were also concerns that increases in supply would drive the price of milk down to the point where it would no longer be profitable to produce.

Ultimately, it appears as though consumer sentiment prevailed over science. Are the biotechnology companies going down the same road with bioengineered foods? [George Anderson - Moderator]

Discussion Thread0