reconsidering retail stores

August 24, 2026

sergeypeterman/Depositphotos.com

Reconsidering the Role of the Retail Store: Are Shoppers Tired of ‘Feeling Predicted’?

According to the most recent report by JLL — titled “Resetting the Retail (Algo)Rhythm” — American shoppers are growing fatigued of excessive AI navigation and involvement in the shopping process, as well as an overload of screens, noise, and other sensory features. Where’s the middle ground as AI tools, digital marketing, and experiential demands butt up against a fatigued U.S. consumer?

The report’s author’s opened with bold text proclaiming that the role of brick-and-mortar retail is more vital than ever, before moving on to the broader premise:

“As customers tire of curated digital feeds and constant screen time, stores can offer something different: tactile discovery, sensory relief and human connection. While AI-powered curation makes infinite product ranges easier to navigate, customers are now pushing back against feeling predicted,” the authors began.”

“This gives retailers an opportunity to reconsider the role of the store. Digital channels are becoming better at delivering speed and convenience, while physical spaces can meet the needs that digital experiences do not fully address,” they added.

Among the top-line findings of the survey data:

  • Discovery remains important: An overwhelming majority (83%) of those polled said they relish finding items at a physical retail store they wouldn’t have looked for online.
  • Overload is happening across a broad spectrum: Nearly three-quarters (72%) of U.S. shoppers indicated they’d departed from a store before planning to “because it felt overwhelming.” That figure rises to 82% of those who self-identify as neurodivergent, and a similar cohort of all shoppers (71%) stated they’d shop more frequently at stores with a quieter, lower-stimulation atmosphere.
  • Online recommendations may be feeling like impositions: Almost half (45%) of respondents suggested that online recommendations impart of feeling of “narrowing what they [consumers] are allowed to like.”
  • Brick-and-mortar retail employees are signaling tech / clutter overload as well: Four-fifths of retail employees surveyed (80%) observed that shoppers appeared more calm in spaces with less clutter, and a majority (53%) want fewer screens at work. More than one-third (38%) indicated they feel pressure to employ technology in their workflow, “even when it slows them down.”

The study authors asked several broader questions obliquely critiquing certain aspects both of mass retail and experiential retail throughout the paper, including

“What if retailers created layouts that rewarded wandering, not efficiency?,” advocating for a balance of composition, complexity, sight/touch/taste, and localization to enhance a feeling of “serendipitous discovery” versus clutter, sameness, and overall feelings of anxiety, being boxed in, etc.

“What if retailers designed for how customers want to feel, not just what they want to buy?,” emphasizing a return to the fundamental appeals of attractive color / contrast, touch, sound, and scent as design principles that can work, as “The fixes customers want are not new features. They are the absence of noise, clutter and screens.”

and, “What if the most powerful content driver isn’t the influencer, but the store itself?,” taking on (and rejecting) the new-ish concept of retail spaces as shareable “social media backdrops.” Instead, it’s argued, deploy digital only when it is an enhancement rather than an encumbrance, and install tasteful amenities to inspire shoppers to linger, participate, and connect. Service is also a cornerstone in this category, with human interaction being central to the brand and the store experience, with the space itself being curated to guide customers through a comfortable, culturally relevant floor.

“The question is not whether stores remain important but how they can create distinctive value alongside increasingly sophisticated digital channels,” the authors noted, underscoring that e-comm retail accounted for just 16.9% of total sales in the first quarter of this year. The study highlighted Audible Storyhouse, Claire’s, Dick’s Collectors Clubhouse, and La La Land cafe’s as particular standouts in pushing forward this balanced new take on the shopper-first concept.

BrainTrust

"Do you agree with JLL's major arguments, and the study findings suggesting that shopper overload is widespread in physical retail? Which arguments are you most skeptical of?"
Avatar of Nicholas Morine

Nicholas Morine



Discussion Questions

Do you agree with JLL’s major arguments, and the study findings suggesting that shopper overload is widespread in physical retail? Which arguments are you most skeptical or supportive of?

How can retailers reward wandering without overly curtailing efficiency on store sales floors? Is ‘serendipitous discovery’ actually a vital element for today’s U.S. shopper?

Are retailers making a mistake by making so many retail touchpoints AI-driven or at least digitally driven? What are some alternatives that don’t increase friction too much?

Poll

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Neil Saunders

Consumers have not rejected technology – including AI – but nor have they embraced it universally. And, when it comes to shopping, we’re seeing a split emerge. Technology is used and widely welcomed in digital experiences, mainly because it creates efficiency and ease. However, in physical experiences, shoppers are often looking for something more human. From our data – and the extensive work we’ve done for Pacsun on the topic – the sharpest divide comes from youth consumers. The most tech savvy generation is the one that craves a digital detox via serendipity and community the most. 

Last edited 1 hour ago by Neil Saunders
Mark Ryski

There is no one answer because every retailer and every shopping mission is different. Wandering isn’t helpful when a customer values efficiency. The moment a shopper enters a store, they are immersed in the retailer’s brand and shopping experience, from staffing and service to merchandising, product mix and checkout. Creating “experiences” without considering how they ultimately contribute to a sales transaction is naïve. In most cases, a sale should be the natural conclusion of a successful shopping experience. With the vast majority of retail sales still occurring in physical stores, retailers should obsess over making every element of that experience work better for the customer and ultimately, convert more visits into sales.

Cathy Hotka
Cathy Hotka

There’s a technology I wish larger retailers would deploy in the store: product locators. Mens’ Dockers may be on sale this week, but where are they?

Bob Amster
Reply to  Cathy Hotka

What? You want retailers to help you find stuff? But then, your shopping trip might end when you them find it exactly where you were told they would be and that might obviate spontaneous or impulsive buys. Aha!

Bob Amster

“There are different strokes for different folks.” Some consumers enjoy the treasure hunt, the surprise and delight, others enjoy the fastest experience possible with a satisfactory outcome (the AI-driven search for what I want. Now, show it to me!), and the leisurely shopper who browses and, maybe, buys something, but does not want to be pressured, pushed, or predicted. Retail can, and will satisfy all three groups. AI will not play a part in all of them.

Bob Phibbs

Reconsidered by who? This “research” is painting the lily except with the “The fixes customers want are not new features. They are the absence of noise, clutter and screens.” Right people want an absence of noise and screens. Color me doubtful few shoppers would say that in an interview of why they don’t buy. It’s lack of human connection. That’s training. That’s hospitality. That’s holding associates accountable.

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

Are people tired of AI being dragged into everything? Indeed they are (hint, hint)
This study seems like (yet) another example of people nodding their heads when you ask them something: do people relish “finding things they wouldn’t have looked for”? Perhaps; but I offer that these same people hate having their time wasted in a forced effort at “discovery”. Far, far too few merchants are adept at game playing, and they really shouldn’t try: give people what they’ve told you they want, in the least obtrusive manner possible…it really shouldn’t be more complicated than that.

Last edited 21 minutes ago by Craig Sundstrom
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Neil Saunders

Consumers have not rejected technology – including AI – but nor have they embraced it universally. And, when it comes to shopping, we’re seeing a split emerge. Technology is used and widely welcomed in digital experiences, mainly because it creates efficiency and ease. However, in physical experiences, shoppers are often looking for something more human. From our data – and the extensive work we’ve done for Pacsun on the topic – the sharpest divide comes from youth consumers. The most tech savvy generation is the one that craves a digital detox via serendipity and community the most. 

Last edited 1 hour ago by Neil Saunders
Mark Ryski

There is no one answer because every retailer and every shopping mission is different. Wandering isn’t helpful when a customer values efficiency. The moment a shopper enters a store, they are immersed in the retailer’s brand and shopping experience, from staffing and service to merchandising, product mix and checkout. Creating “experiences” without considering how they ultimately contribute to a sales transaction is naïve. In most cases, a sale should be the natural conclusion of a successful shopping experience. With the vast majority of retail sales still occurring in physical stores, retailers should obsess over making every element of that experience work better for the customer and ultimately, convert more visits into sales.

Cathy Hotka
Cathy Hotka

There’s a technology I wish larger retailers would deploy in the store: product locators. Mens’ Dockers may be on sale this week, but where are they?

Bob Amster
Reply to  Cathy Hotka

What? You want retailers to help you find stuff? But then, your shopping trip might end when you them find it exactly where you were told they would be and that might obviate spontaneous or impulsive buys. Aha!

Bob Amster

“There are different strokes for different folks.” Some consumers enjoy the treasure hunt, the surprise and delight, others enjoy the fastest experience possible with a satisfactory outcome (the AI-driven search for what I want. Now, show it to me!), and the leisurely shopper who browses and, maybe, buys something, but does not want to be pressured, pushed, or predicted. Retail can, and will satisfy all three groups. AI will not play a part in all of them.

Bob Phibbs

Reconsidered by who? This “research” is painting the lily except with the “The fixes customers want are not new features. They are the absence of noise, clutter and screens.” Right people want an absence of noise and screens. Color me doubtful few shoppers would say that in an interview of why they don’t buy. It’s lack of human connection. That’s training. That’s hospitality. That’s holding associates accountable.

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

Are people tired of AI being dragged into everything? Indeed they are (hint, hint)
This study seems like (yet) another example of people nodding their heads when you ask them something: do people relish “finding things they wouldn’t have looked for”? Perhaps; but I offer that these same people hate having their time wasted in a forced effort at “discovery”. Far, far too few merchants are adept at game playing, and they really shouldn’t try: give people what they’ve told you they want, in the least obtrusive manner possible…it really shouldn’t be more complicated than that.

Last edited 21 minutes ago by Craig Sundstrom

More Discussions