Photo: @eddieespinal via Twenty20
A new Columbia Business School study found that, depending on the competitive landscape a retailer faces, a national pricing strategy may now be more profitable than a strategy that tailors prices locally.
Researchers analyzed 11 million store-level digital camera sale observations across 1,600 geographic markets. Profits of national and local pricing policies were monitored across two retailers employing a national approach and a third that followed a local strategy.
The findings concluded that:
- National pricing boosts profitability for large chains: Large retailers that operate in competitive markets don't have much to gain from switching to a local model because it can intensify competition, which could lead to lower prices and hurt profitability.
- Pricing depends on local competitiveness: Chains facing less competition should tailor their prices and focus on customization.
- National pricing can benefit some consumers: Because the national price would fall between the lower price in competitive markets and the higher price in non-competitive markets, consumers in non-competitive markets, which are often rural, would benefit from lower prices.
- Columbia Business School Research Finds that Customization of Pricing Is Not Always the Best Strategy for Retailers or Consumers – Columbia Business School/PR Newswire
- An Empirical Study of National vs. Local Pricing by Chain Stores Under Competition – Informs
- Uniform Pricing in US Retail Chains – University of California at Berkeley
- Retailers are charging the same prices across US, boosting income inequality, new research shows – CNBC
- Prices are becoming more uniform and that's to Amazon's advantage – Digital Commerce 360
- In-store prices can vary by location, even within same chain – St. Louis Today
- More Amazon Effects: Online Competition and Pricing Behaviors – Harvard Business School
- Study: Omnichannel customer experience far from seamless – RetailWire
