The Future Will Be Different

By Al McClain
At the recent National Grocers Association’s (NGA) Executive Conference, Andrew Zoli, who is futurist in-residence for Popular Science and American Demographics magazines, outlined a future full of opportunity and complexity. Here is a sample of some of the trends he sees that will affect the retailing industry:
Demographic Transformation
- While the world is on the road to a population of over 9+ billion, the rate of growth is slowing and population in parts of Europe and Russia is actually declining.
- Urbanization is increasing – soon more people will live in cities than in rural areas.
- In some developing countries, 70 percent of the population is under 30, while many developed countries have much older populations (e.g. Italy’s average age is over 50).
- The U.S. will have the largest number of old people and young people in 2025. It will be hard for the smaller working population to provide resources to these groups
- There will be a huge number of products designed to help boomers live longer.
Choice, Commoditization & Experience
- Supermarkets are a sea of sameness, offering the “tyranny of choice” – 40,000+ SKU’s (of which many are near-duplicates) while consumers can pay attention to only 160.
- Individual product choices and innovations often do not offer enough benefit to offset the time and trouble it takes consumers to figure out what the benefits are.
- The older a consumer is, the more satisfied they are with fewer choices.
- Companies need a chief “no” officer to simplify things, edit product choices, etc.
- Staples is an example of a retailer addressing these changes by reducing SKUs, developing an “Easy Rebate” program, and conducting an annual competition for best consumer innovations.
The Rise of Ambient Intelligence
- Technology will be embedded everywhere, such as “functional packaging” where a package of pills can actually email you to remind you to take your dose or another container to tell you how ripe the fruit is inside.
Green Goes Mainstream
- Environmental trends are moving from conservation to sustainability to “ecovation.”
- LOHAS (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability) products will sell a lot more in the future as older consumers embrace “green” and as they think about their legacy. Young people will embrace the trend, as well.
- LOHAS consumers are willing to pay a 20 percent premium.
During the Q & A, Mr. Zoli said that the trend will not necessarily be to smaller stores but that consumers want retailers to present a better-edited assortment and help guide them to the products they want via simplified signage and directories.
As part of a panel discussion that followed, Al Plamann of Unified Western Grocers suggested that changing consumer demographics might actually call for more products, not less.
Tom Zaucha of NGA said that he was taken with the magnitude of the change that Mr. Zoli forecast and sees opportunities for entrepreneurs in the industry that have a good understanding of what consumers want on store shelves.
Dick King of Associated Food Stores-Retail noted there are not enough skilled younger workers to accommodate the industry’s needs and there will be a need to rely more on older
generations.
Discussion Question: What do you see as key opportunities for retailers and manufacturers based on Mr. Zoli’s outlook?
Join the Discussion!
11 Comments on "The Future Will Be Different"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Mr. Zoli’s comments are somewhat predictable. What will mold the consumers’ buying patterns will be predicated by new technology which will provide faster more significant information regarding pricing and selection. Those retailers that can carve out their own loyalty programs – establishing a stable customer base in conjunction with this technology – are more likely to succeed. The cell phone will be the integral component in this transformation.
Everything in life will continue to evolve based on changes in economics, demographics, personal pleasures, social mores, technology, philosophies, politics and whatever. The key opportunities for retailers and manufacturers will begin with staying in tune with the early nuances that the ever-changing marketplaces will continually send.
If a neighborhood starts to transcend from one ethnic, economic or social characteristic to another, early focus should be on serving the wants and needs of the new consumers. That will revise and perhaps reduce the number of SKUs involved from neighborhood to neighborhood. But in a global sense the total number of SKUs should increase. Innovation, technology and management insight in combination will be the driving forces in creating and distributing different products productively in the revising world of future commerce.
A large scale study last year (I can provide details to those who are interested) said that experts’ predictions are no more accurate than chance when predicting the future — no one can predict the future, not even experts. I know this is fun to do, and I also recognize the value of light-heartedness; I’m not sure how much we can really get out of this kind of speculation, especially when there are so many urgent issues in retailing to attend to.
Regarding David’s point, I think the conundrum is that the increasing diversity of shoppers leads retailers to think that they need more and more SKU’s to satisfy a diversity of tastes while we are learning that shoppers may prefer smaller stores and an edited assortment. So, the answer would seem to be stores that are individually tailored to the demographics of their local trading area.
I found the analysis to be wedded to somewhat outmoded criteria. For instance, “0ld is not what it once was” – 50 does not denote time for the rocking chair now, but time for increased activity now that the “kids” are out of the house. As for rural vs. urban differentiations – I doubt that there are the same lifestyle differences there may have once been. Rural does not mean backwoods any longer.
Maybe I missed the point here, but we are led to believe that we need to strip down our assortment because there is way too much duplication – then in the next breath we have someone stand up and say we need MORE assortment. I don’t get it.
I agree with Len Lewis comments that “Nothing that Mr. Zoli said is all that unusual” or I might add, unpredictable.
I disagree with Mr. Zoli’s conjecture that there is too much choice in retail and that consumers are demanding “less.” There already exist formats in which constrained selection is offered, such as Clubs. Demand has a remarkable ability to define and impact supply and if such an attitude were to develop you can bet that it retail will follow pretty quickly.
I do believe that Mr. Zoli’s underlying message is a good one, that change is a constant and being attuned to such change and adjusting or getting out in front of it is the hallmark of the successful retailer. This alone will distinguish the face of retail in the next 50 years just as it had the last 50. Sam Walton and others were attuned to such changes and were successful in exploiting it and the age of discount retailing was begun.
Let’s not forget that these are the same people who, 50 years ago, predicted we’d all have flying cars and personal robots to do the drudge work and free us for more intellectual pursuits. I’m still waiting.
Nothing that Mr. Zoli said is all that unusual. But in one way or another they all provide opportunities for retailers. One of the big ones in my mind is the new urbanization. It’s going to require new types of stores, products, sizes and different packaging.
I would point to Al Plamann’s comment that consumer diversity means an opportunity to broaden the field of fire in terms of products and services. There are few places in the U.S. where this is more evident than in California.
Some retailers are already taking action on key demographic and lifestyle trends: (1) they hire the undocumented when they’re faced with labor shortages (2) drug store chains are building new locations to serve the graying of America (3) Whole Foods and branded organics are expanding quickly to serve LOHAS consumers. The Chief “No” Officer position is still a rarity, though, since most retailers and many manufactured items are still getting more and more complicated. Steve Jobs maybe the best Chief No Officer so far, since Apple products tend to be very easy to use. More and more marketing campaigns, web sites, products, and procedures are running in the opposite direction. Great design looks simple, even if its creation isn’t.