
fotoforce/Depositphotos.com
May 16, 2025
Will Keen’s Stated Focus on ‘Doing the Right Thing,’ Price Freezes, and ‘Made in America’ Products Impress Customers?
Privately held footwear company Keen has made a name for itself in its retail sector, cultivating a reputation for quality among consumers and building longstanding relationships with vendors and retailers.
In a recent interview with Modern Retail’s Julia Waldow, Keen COO Hari Perumal discussed the brand’s recent announcement that it would not be hiking prices in response to President Donald Trump’s wide-reaching tariffs on foreign imports. Moreover, in a second discussion held with Shop Eat Surf Outdoor (via sister publication Retail TouchPoints), Perumal discussed the nature of Keen’s focus on brand loyalty and long-term partnerships with its distributors.
Keen Owns One-Third of Its Production, Plans To Absorb Tariff Costs Alongside Vendors
Waldow underscored the fact that Keen owned one-third (33%) of its production, leaning heavily on factories in the U.S., the Dominican Republic, and Thailand, with the remainder being produced through partners in Cambodia, Vietnam, and India.
Compared to many competitors in the footwear space, Keen appears to be in an enviable position, particularly as the company has zero tariff exposure in China — yet, despite this, it still faces a 10% universal tariff as well as potentially higher reciprocal tariffs on a nation-by-nation basis.
“So, the way we absorb this is through upstream value chain efficiency. What does that mean? The footwear-producing factory will share some of those burdens. And then the tier-one vendor that supplies to the footwear factory will share some of those in their material costs. A tier-two vendor that supplies to tier-one will absorb some of those costs,” Perumal explained.
“We have these long-term partnerships that we have developed over a very long time that enable us to share this cost upstream, so we don’t have to pass this onto our fans,” he added.
And despite the expectation of cost-cutting measures or planned expenses to make up for the profit shortfall related to freezing prices, the company has signaled that it expects to invest in new categories, including the imminent launch of a trail-running category.
Keen Plans To Build Kentucky Factory, Seeing Historical Strength in ‘Made in America’ Sentiment
Keen also recently announced plans to replace its factory in Portland, Oregon, with a new facility in Shepherdsville, Kentucky — a larger factory designed to take on 9% of the company’s total production, up from 5% previously.
“Today, we’re building on that foundation with a new facility in Shepherdsville, Kentucky. Around 5% of our production comes from the U.S., and it’s primarily work boots, what we call utility products. We are expanding [production in the U.S.] to outdoor products and, possibly, the running category. Once operational, the Kentucky facility will be capable of producing up to 9% of our U.S. sales. More importantly, it will allow us to be faster, more responsive and closer to the market, reaching 80% of American consumers within two days by ground shipping,” Perumal said.
“This is a major win, not only for logistics, but also for reducing our carbon footprint and increasing our operational agility,” he added.
Perumal Talks ‘Made in America’ Work Boots, Impact of Supporting Its Customer/Retailer Shared Community
Finally, Perumal spoke to the related concepts of its U.S.-made high-end work boot product lineup, as well as its commitment to both loyal customers and retail partners.
On the first score, the COO admitted that he had reservations about manufacturing any products whatsoever stateside, particularly as labor expenses were 10 to 12 times more costly as compared to the same figures in Asian nations. However, he found clarity in a conversation with Keen’s head of sales, who reiterated the centrality of domestic manufacturing to the brand’s ethos.
“The [Keen] head of sales always said ‘Made in America’ is important. I’ve gone on several retail tours with our sales folks and the resounding answer is yes, retailers want American built, even if [the boots] cost something like $300. If we have a [Keen] fan that wants to buy the product, and we have a retailer that wants to carry the product, why not make it in America?” Perumal said.
The Keen exec elaborated on this point of consumer/retail sentiment, stating that loyalty to both its customers and its vendors (and retail distributors) was of prime importance.
In a reply to Waldow’s questions related to price increases, Perumal indicated that price and payment flexibility were nothing new for the footwear brand — during the COVID-19 pandemic, Keen told retailers that they could pay Keen last if that would help alleviate some pressure on their balance sheets.
“Our first priority is showing up to support our community when they need us, at a time of so much uncertainty,” Perumal said. “If doing the right thing earns us more loyalty, that’s something we would welcome. But our main objective is to show up for our fans and retail partners when they need us most.”
One caveat, however: While price increases have been ruled out by Keen for 2025, next year may be a different matter entirely. Price increases are generally inevitable, whether due to the usual effect of inflation or other factors, and the company is slated to reevaluate its price freeze in 2026 based upon prevailing macroeconomic conditions at that time.
Discussion Questions
Will Keen’s stated focus on “doing the right thing,” price freezes, and “Made in America” products impress customers? Will these efforts attract new buyers, reinforce loyal customers’ buying habits, or influence neither?
What other footwear brands might consider following suit by freezing prices and shifting some amount of manufacturing stateside, if any? Which brands are best positioned to absorb these costs in favor of making a play for consumer sentiment?
In which retail sectors does the “Made in America” sentiment hold profit potential, if any? Is the notion anything more than sentimental, or does it actually drive spend long term?
Poll
BrainTrust
Gene Detroyer
Professor, International Business, Guizhou University of Finance & Economics and University of Sanya, China.
Doug Garnett
President, Protonik
Mohamed Amer, PhD
CEO & Strategic Board Advisor, Strategy Doctor
Recent Discussions







Consumers say they prefer things to be made in the USA. Their spending habits suggest otherwise. Made in the USA is nice, but it is not the prime driver of buying. That said, enlarging the share of products made in the US (though it will still be a minority) is helpful for Keen in that it helps them avoid some tariffs. As for holding prices steady, this is a good move – Keen obviously has good enough margins to absorb the 10% rate and, fortunately, it has no exposure to China, where the tariff rate is higher!
“… retailers want American built, even if [the boots] cost something like $300.” He had me up until there: as in do customers actually want that (and for those who’ve forgotten: that’s the other part of the transaction that can actually make it work). But that’s always been the problem, hasn’t it: talk is cheap, but if your product isn’t, a “heroic” stand makes for the next troubled retailer. I wish them well – I guess – but the next time Don suffers indigestion, and raises the default to rate 95% ‘cuz he’s mad at the world, we’ll see how firm their resolve is.
As a long time Keen’s wearer and Portland resident (their HQ is here), I just don’t see Keen’s customers being moved much by these steps. While Made in America makes a great political slogan, I’ve worked with campaigns using it which targeted exactly those people who would care most – and find it has little economic impact. It’s good that Keens are made here, but I don’t see it as a significant advantage to make a big deal about it.
Many customers are drawn to American-made products due to their perceived higher quality and the support they provide to local economies.
Additionally, the emphasis on domestic manufacturing can resonate with consumers who prioritize sustainability and ethical labor practices.
As a result, this focus could enhance Keen’s brand image and attract a loyal customer base.
As consumers slowly absorb a production & trade education they didn’t know they needed,,, the term “Made” in America has cracks in its facade.
Assembled? Designed? 77% made in USA?
In theory most want to be good to local economies, as well as eco/green conscious. But the emptier the wallet, the more internalized consumption becomes.
Keen seems to have found differentiators that are also in line with their (private not public) bottom line.
I also see “perceived higher quality” as becoming even more category specific.
Does the avg USA consumer even know of someone who works in the textile, leather or chip making trades? Automotive, warehousing or aftermarket services is more likely.
Sounds like Keen is going to be able to leverage some strategic advantages they have built over the years. No exposure in China. Very fortuitous if not prescient. Owning 33% of their own production. Very fortuitous if not prescient. Those two factors add up to a pretty big deal in this moment. Actually, a huge deal at this moment. They add up to a strategic advantage that very few companies will be able to enjoy. I’m guessing they see it as an opporutnity to grab market share while other shoe companies raise prices and won’t have the ability to talk about “Made in the USA”.
And it’s great that the article points out the COO’s hesitation to make products in the USA given the 10-12 time multiple of labor costs. 10-12 time multiple. I guess they found a way to make that work in $300 boots, but how many other apparel categories can absorb a 10-12 tie multiple in labor costs? Very, very, very few. Which is a surprise to exactly no one in the shoe, boot or apparel business.
KEEN’s approach to tariffs and American manufacturing showcases a noteworthy values-based business strategy during times of economic uncertainty. Their decision to freeze prices despite the introduction of new tariffs reflects a commendable long-term perspective in an industry often focused on short-term results. As a privately held company, KEEN has greater operational flexibility, allowing it to align more closely with its core mission and values.
The “Made in America” premium positioning for work boots demonstrates business acumen, as the company recognizes the market value of domestic production and consumers’ willingness to pay more for these products. Additionally, KEEN’s partnership approach provides retailers with pricing stability during uncertain times.
If their margins are deep enough to hold prices, good for them. As far as “Made in America”, that is an old song that has been playing for decades. (Was it the Ford administration?) It didn’t work then, and it won’t work now.
If Keen’s is in a position where their finances permit them to absorb the tariffs, than more power to them. I congratulate them, although I don’t know if this was foresight, or somewhat plain luck. Either way, it seems they’ve done the right financial analysis to know that this is a sound business decision for them that may allow them to gain some market share as other brands who lack this positioning have no alternative but to raise prices (which is generally the majority of brands).
However, if their new factory will allow them to raise Made in America manufacturing to 9%, that still leaves 91% of their production made elsewhere in the world. This really isn’t as Earth shattering as they make it seem, and while it may great for $300 work boots, I don’t see this making much of a difference to their bottom line.From a marketing and customer sentiment point of view, sure, claiming you have more Made in America product sounds great – but the reality is that while you can survey consumers all you want about “Buying American”, when they put their wallets on the table, the outcome is rarely the same as the survey results – consumers will favor a better deal over where a product is made in most categories. So while there is certainly an audience that appreciates this Made in America story (there certainly is an audience of one that will come out in favor of this storyline), it’s unlikely to move the needle in market share.
Keene is projecting new products and future sales based upon their past markets and purchasing template. They aren’t even in the running shoe category, and believe that their customer will want a made in the USA product and will pay a premium price for it. This is not work boots. The market is different and the dynamics between choosing one brand over another comes with a price. Ask Nike, Adidas, Puma, Asics, New Balance, etc.