August 21, 2026
pftrip/Depositphotos.com
How Much Should TJX Worry About its Recent US Sales Performance?
It’s well-known that TJX Companies has enjoyed great success over the past few years, often delivering strong quarterly report cards boasting earnings and comparable sales wins. And while that may still be true for many of the company’s markets, its performance stateside — under the Marmaxx division, which includes physical and ecomm business for TJ Maxx, Marshalls, and Sierra — during the second quarter is raising a bit of a hubbub among analysts.
In an August 20 report, Retail Dive’s Daphne Howland outlined that while TJX observed Q2 net sales of over $15 billion alongside sales growth of 5.4% and comparable sales growth of 4%, the numbers were much less inspiring for Marmaxx.
“TJX Companies posted a rare miss on Wednesday, reporting that Q2 comp sales at its U.S. Marmaxx division rose just 1% year over year, well below its own and analyst expectations. Comps in the segment grew 6% last quarter and 3% a year ago,” Howland wrote.
“CEO Ernie Herrman blamed merchandising missteps, telling analysts on a Wednesday call that ‘it’s more about what we didn’t have in the mix,’” she added.
Marmaxx, TJX’s biggest segment combining TJ Maxx and Marshalls, posted second-quarter comparable sales growth of 1 per cent, down from 6 per cent in the previous quarter, after a self-inflicted store-mix slowdown.https://t.co/uQHYRg1e00
— Fibre2Fashion (@fibre2fashion) August 21, 2026
Some interesting highlights presented by the report:
- Certain stores and markets did quite well: HomeGoods (with the HomeSense banner included) saw net sales trend upward by 10% (to $2.5 billion), with strong comp sales improvement of 7%. The Canadian business observed a net sales increase of 6% (to $1.5 billion) and comps ticking up by 6%. Europe plus Australia saw net sales growth of 11% (to more than $2 billion) and a similar comp sales growth figure of 7%.
- This quarterly performance in terms of U.S. comp sales is the worst in a decade: Howland cited Wells Fargo Ike Boruchow on this stat, with the company being “slow to diagnose” the underlying problem at that time. This time around, “we’re aren’t out of the woods yet,” he added.
- Despite the negative, TJX brass still sees brighter skies ahead: On conference call, Herrman indicated that Marmaxx was already experiencing a rebound to kick off the third quarter, and further that “greater improvement by the holiday selling season” was in the cards.
Analysts, including RetailWire BrainTrust panelist and GlobalData managing director Neil Saunders, suggested that TJ Maxx’s value messaging may have been hampered during Q2, particularly given competition from Prime Day and other competing sales — and the performance of Ross may speak to this roaming shoppers’ eye as well.
“Ross should come closer to a 9% comp, and some of that has to be coming from TJX, right?” William Blair analyst Dylan Carden said, per Howland.
In fact, Ross beat even that prediction: Q2 total sales improved by a whopping 13% YoY, and for the first half of 2026, comp sales were up by the exact same figure (13%, or 10% on a quarterly basis). EPS was registered at $4.69 versus $3.03 in the year-prior period, speaking to Ross’ success.
And on the horizon — a continued balancing act between cost-averse and choosy customers and the pressure imposed by tariff costs. The question remains: How concerned shout TJX be about Marmaxx’s performance in the near future, and what can be done to address headwinds?
BrainTrust
Nicholas Morine
Recent Discussions
Discussion Questions
Should TJX be concerned about its U.S. sales performance in the near-term? Why or why not? What steps can it take to improve numbers?
Which factor(s) do you believe are pulling down Marmaxx’s performance figures most obviously? Are there any other headwinds not mentioned?
Do you believe CEO Ernie Herrman when he indicates merchandising missteps as a primary cause of the recent faltering?
Poll
Overall, TJX’s performance was solid. But, mixed in with strongly advancing divisions was an uncharacteristically soft performance from TJMaxx and Marshalls. This is concerning as those two chains are the backbone of the business. However, there are multiple factors driving the weaker figures, some of which are temporary and some of which are more persistent challenges. The more temporary issue came from a weak assortment that didn’t have enough desirable brands and wasn’t focused enough on an early back-to-school season. TJX has now remedied that; from our data, trading has already picked up as a result and should allow for a better Q3. The more persistent problem comes from a resurgent Ross and more discounting in mainstream retail. The latter will likely unwind a bit over the rest of this year. The former is a newer challenge that requires TJX to raise its game.
Define “concerned”
Should they be concerned that they’re in a competitive market, and that the same forces – a lackluster economy(for much of the population), persistent inflation and the decline of tradtional soft-goods retailers (macy*s, JCP) – which drive customers to them will also drive customers to those competitors?
That just because they’ve been doing great for years is no assurance that they’ll continue to do so ?
Yes, of course they should…but that’s because competent retailers should always be concerned by those things. It has little to do with the specifics of (mere) quarterly performance.
Merchandising missteps are fixable, and the fact that they’ve already diagnosed the problem and are seeing a rebound to start Q3 is encouraging. This looks more like a one-off executional hiccup.
TJX should be concerned. Marmaxx’s result exposes a wider challenge for off-price retail. Ross and Burlington are expanding. JCPenney is attacking missing sizes and wasted trips. Its campaign has not yet shown a gain in market share. Low prices and branded goods may no longer guarantee frequent visits.
TJX’s figures make that warning specific. Marmaxx’s 1% comparable-sales gain came from a higher basket, while customer transactions fell. TJX also reported that inventory per store rose 2% overall. Branded goods remained widely available. The sector appears to have enough merchandise. Competitive advantage will come from choosing the right goods and moving them quickly to local markets.
Herrman’s explanation is credible. TJX should shorten the feedback path from stores to buyers. Regional teams should move stock when local gaps appear. Strong off-price retailers will preserve discovery while making each trip more dependable. That combination can protect traffic without forcing heavier markdowns.
Herrman’s candor on the merchandising miss is credible, and the Q3 rebound is encouraging. But falling transactions deserve the most attention. Marmaxx’s model runs on repeat visits powered by discovery, and that mechanism is under stress. Ross’ 13% comp demands a closer read. The growth is traffic-led, built on new customer acquisition plus higher repeat engagement, and driven deliberately through marketing investment and in-store experience work that Conroy has been executing since taking the CEO role in early 2025. That is not a one-quarter anomaly. It is a trend line that has been building for four straight quarters.
The longer-run challenge is that Ross is now actively earning each visit while Marmaxx relies on shoppers arriving on discovery impulse. Those are different operating philosophies, and the traffic data is rewarding the former.
More Discussions
What Do Recent Labor Day Surveys Tell Us About the Current State of the American Consumer?
What are your takeaways from recent survey data around expected Labor Day spend?Does David’s Bridal’s New Outlet Concept Have Long-Term Potential?
How much long-term potential do you see in the David’s Bridal outlet concept?As Target’s Ulta Partnership Expires, Will its New Beauty Studio Design Be an Adequate Replacement?
Will Target have a clean, and perhaps profitable, pivot to its own beauty shop as the…
Overall, TJX’s performance was solid. But, mixed in with strongly advancing divisions was an uncharacteristically soft performance from TJMaxx and Marshalls. This is concerning as those two chains are the backbone of the business. However, there are multiple factors driving the weaker figures, some of which are temporary and some of which are more persistent challenges. The more temporary issue came from a weak assortment that didn’t have enough desirable brands and wasn’t focused enough on an early back-to-school season. TJX has now remedied that; from our data, trading has already picked up as a result and should allow for a better Q3. The more persistent problem comes from a resurgent Ross and more discounting in mainstream retail. The latter will likely unwind a bit over the rest of this year. The former is a newer challenge that requires TJX to raise its game.
Define “concerned”
Should they be concerned that they’re in a competitive market, and that the same forces – a lackluster economy(for much of the population), persistent inflation and the decline of tradtional soft-goods retailers (macy*s, JCP) – which drive customers to them will also drive customers to those competitors?
That just because they’ve been doing great for years is no assurance that they’ll continue to do so ?
Yes, of course they should…but that’s because competent retailers should always be concerned by those things. It has little to do with the specifics of (mere) quarterly performance.
Merchandising missteps are fixable, and the fact that they’ve already diagnosed the problem and are seeing a rebound to start Q3 is encouraging. This looks more like a one-off executional hiccup.
TJX should be concerned. Marmaxx’s result exposes a wider challenge for off-price retail. Ross and Burlington are expanding. JCPenney is attacking missing sizes and wasted trips. Its campaign has not yet shown a gain in market share. Low prices and branded goods may no longer guarantee frequent visits.
TJX’s figures make that warning specific. Marmaxx’s 1% comparable-sales gain came from a higher basket, while customer transactions fell. TJX also reported that inventory per store rose 2% overall. Branded goods remained widely available. The sector appears to have enough merchandise. Competitive advantage will come from choosing the right goods and moving them quickly to local markets.
Herrman’s explanation is credible. TJX should shorten the feedback path from stores to buyers. Regional teams should move stock when local gaps appear. Strong off-price retailers will preserve discovery while making each trip more dependable. That combination can protect traffic without forcing heavier markdowns.
Herrman’s candor on the merchandising miss is credible, and the Q3 rebound is encouraging. But falling transactions deserve the most attention. Marmaxx’s model runs on repeat visits powered by discovery, and that mechanism is under stress. Ross’ 13% comp demands a closer read. The growth is traffic-led, built on new customer acquisition plus higher repeat engagement, and driven deliberately through marketing investment and in-store experience work that Conroy has been executing since taking the CEO role in early 2025. That is not a one-quarter anomaly. It is a trend line that has been building for four straight quarters.
The longer-run challenge is that Ross is now actively earning each visit while Marmaxx relies on shoppers arriving on discovery impulse. Those are different operating philosophies, and the traffic data is rewarding the former.