Associates Who Can’t Be Bothered, Bother Customers

Findings of the second annual Retail Customer Dissatisfaction Study from the Wharton School’s Jay H. Baker Retail Initiative and the Verde Group show that there are a lot of really bad sales people employed in stores and customers can point them out assuming they can find them on the floor.
According to the telephone survey of 1,000 people, one-third reported being unable to find anyone to help them while shopping. Another 25 percent said that they could find sales people but it made little difference since the store employee ignored them.
Not surprisingly, these experiences remain fresh in the minds of consumers who often choose to take their business elsewhere.
Paula Courtney, president of the Verde Group, told Knowledge@Wharton that survey respondents could deal with a lot, even having to wait while an overworked salesperson tried to meet the needs of multiple shoppers on the floor. What they couldn’t deal with, she said, was the “conscious ignoring” that takes place.
“Customers would walk into a store and the store representative would see them and continue to put items on the shelf or watch the cash register or do administrative work — absolutely ignoring the fact that an actual person was in the store,” she said.
Stephen J. Hoch, marketing professor at Wharton and the director of the Baker Initiative, said, “There are a variety of different triggers for having a bad shopping experience, including things like parking or how well the store is organized. Some of those things retailers can do something about and some of them they can’t. But frankly, a very important part of the retail experience is the interaction with the sales associate.”
According to numbers from last year’s study, one-third of dissatisfied customers will tell others about a negative experience at a store. Those people will then go and retell the story to an average of four people. Roughly half of those surveyed said they had chosen not to shop at a particular store based on what they heard of another person’s experience.
Having strong sales people is a business imperative and based on the research is a clear competitive advantage for retailers.
Prof. Hoch said there are characteristics that seem to be common among the best sales people. These include being an “engager”, “educator”, “expediter”, and “authentic”.
Engagers are those who smile and stop what they are doing to assist customers. Not finding an engager is the most prevalent sales related problem, according to the survey’s respondents.
Educators are able to explain the ins and outs of product and make recommendations based on the stated needs of the shopper.
Expediters are those who are sensitive about a customers time and help move the shopping experience along. Said Prof. Hoch, “You see this one at the airport or other locations where there is some clog-up in the system. This sales person recognizes that, with their intervention, things can keep moving forward… Someone has to notice the problem and go out of their way to alleviate it.”
Authentic sales people demonstrate they are people first and let the sales come naturally. They don’t push shoppers but let them know they are available as soon as help is needed. “No one wants to be ignored,” said Ms. Courtney, “but there is a balance between the right level of engagement and a sense of genuineness.”
According to Ms. Courtney, the solution to the sales people related problems at retail is often not about “getting more bodies,” but “getting more staff to show behaviors that are sensitive to consumers’ needs. The good news is that all of this is trainable,” she said.
Discussion Questions: How big a problem is poor salesmanship at retail? What are ways that retailers are dealing with the issue to help floor associates better meet the needs of shoppers?
Join the Discussion!
20 Comments on "Associates Who Can’t Be Bothered, Bother Customers"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Just a thought. Perhaps it should be the frontline employees who get all the profit sharing and stock options and bonuses instead of people like the CEOs of Home Depot and Macy’s, who seem determined to run their employees (and retail chains) into the ground?
I believe what the discount retailers have done is to have so few employees on the sales floor that no interaction is better then a bad one. There are a few people that have the passion for taking care of customers but they get different jobs. Retail employees are part of a larger societal shift, to “I only work for what I get paid for.” With limited resources, today’s retail management teams have to always coach and develop their employees. High turnover and low pay will not be changing any time soon, so customers will just move from their last retail experience to their next.
Most American retail executives publicly claim their salespeople are wonderful assets. Privately they usually admit that low wages and high turnover = self service = no service. Very few shoppers expect anything more except in the highest-end stores, like Saks or Whole Foods. And some shoppers avoid higher-end stores because they believe that those salespeople will actually be armtwisters.
Everyone has walked out of a store because of a lack of service, especially at larger stores. Better service exists (I find) at smaller, specialty shops. If I need something for the kitchen, I go to Sur La Table or Williams Sonoma, not Linens N Things. Shoes? I go to a neighborhood shop, not DSW. Groceries? Workers at Potash Bros. in Chicago even remember my name, unlike those at Jewel. At these smaller stores, I find salespeople who look happier and are more interested in helping me, even suggesting other stores if they don’t have the item I want. So what is it that the local stores do to prepare their employees to be better customer sales associates?
I wonder how Circuit City’s plan to get rid of its best store-level performers is working out these days….
Seriously, though….
The comments we’ve all made today reinforce for me a simple point: employee engagement has to come from the top.
You can train and motivate, measure and reward, and the whole program will drive up all the numbers you want to look at–customer satisfaction, sales and, yes, margins.
But you have to start with management that actually sees its people as human beings whose insights contribute to the organization.
Once the folks at the top decide that anyone below a given level in the field is a monkey, employee engagement becomes an expensive waste of time for middle management and a cruel joke on employees.
And as the data has shown for years, employees treat customers pretty much exactly as management treats employees.
First, I agree with Mr. Percy.
The longer I am in the business, the more I wonder why most retailers even bother to talk about their customer service.
1. The first thing that is slashed when sales go soft is payroll. Additionally, most managers making schedules do not make them to maximize the needs of the customer. They plug in shifts that the associates are asking for. Why do you think stores never have enough people on Sundays or prime times?
2. There is little to no training on how to interview, check references, make the offer, or on-board the associate.
3. Many companies have gone “soft” and accountability is missing.
4. Fewer people in our society know common courtesy or use common sense, which is really all you need to sell.
I could go on…this is the easiest “lightbulb” that helps/hinders business yet it really isn’t addressed in the simply apparent way it should be.
Oh, and I forgot to mention that the leaders don’t make it FUN!
The fundamental problem is the difference between “Help Wanted” and help recruited. Unfortunately, many employers, especially in retail and foodservices, only focus on staffing when lack of staff becomes an issue. As we move toward 2010 and beyond it will become obvious to employers they will compete for employees as well as customers. Creating a hiring environment that provides for advancement and career opportunities and stipulating to potential applicants the attributes a company places value in is a good start. Of course, once the employee has met the standards the employer must be able to recognize and reward with positive reinforcement. Until we get beyond the belief that reducing overhead through low wages is a winning strategy and employee attitudes of what do they expect for what I’m being paid that result, expect service issues to increase at an accelerated pace.
Poor customer service has many underlining components. However, a major reason for insufficient customer service, at least in the discount channel, can be traced to management. The “associate” is evaluated on a productivity level (tasks completed) vs. customer service. With the pressure of getting things done because of the understaffing of the store, service levels will continue to decrease.