May 8, 2026
Photo courtesy of Kraft Heinz
Are ‘Better-For-You’ Product Tweaks Enough To Anchor a Kraft Heinz Turnaround?
Kraft Heinz has been making above-the-fold news for some time now, not only due to its size and recent confusion about a potential split — one now narrowly avoided — but also for its ongoing turnaround effort.
That turnaround effort, under the leadership of new CEO Steve Cahillane, has seen early positive results. According to the most recent quarterly report card, Kraft Heinz outpaced Wall Street analysts’ expectations on sales, delivering $6.05 billion versus $5.89 billion expected.
And according to a recent report from Modern Retail’s Gabriela Barkho, a lot of the most recent successes can be tied to the brand’s pivot to include “better-for-you” options alongside its traditional mainstays of Kraft Mac & Cheese, Philadelphia cream cheese, and Capri Sun. The former — although not the national icon that Kraft Dinner is in Canada — enjoyed a market share of 45% in 2022, but had slipped to 39% byy 2026, indicating change was necessary to remain the market leader as Goodles and Banza shouldered in.
In addition to the Philadelphia Lactose-Free option, two other staples product lines were mentioned:
- Kraft Mac & Cheese gets two different tune-ups: In one corner, we have the new PowerMac lineup which launched last month. Each box promises 18 grams of protein per serving, in addition to six grams of fiber. Although only two flavors are currently available — original and white cheddar — others could be introduced in the near future. In the other corner, a new assortment of restaurant-inspired glow-ups for the traditional recipe, including Monterey Jack caramelized onion, Parmesan pesto, and Romano cacio e pepe. Regarding PowerMac, Cahillane indicated that sell-in was “outstanding,” with 35,000 accounts active as of a very recent earnings call.
- Capri Sun Hydrate: A one-two-three punch of increased electrolytes, vitamin E, and a 50% reduction in sugar content as compared to the standard pouch, Capri Sun Hydrate represented an opportunity “to continue the momentum that was built last year,” according to Cahillane.
Cahillane also signaled that fan-favorite Lunchables was also about to join the fray with a new product lineup.
“We’ve got a Lunchables renovation, which is coming next month. We’ll be investing against that. We’ve seen a good turnaround in Lunchables, which started at the end of last year,” he added.
US Consumers Dialed In on Wellness, and CPG Needs To Move To Address Demand (Especially as Private Label Competitors Up Their Game)
There’s a lot of chatter going on as to the wellness boom (and resultant success of “better-for-you” CPGs), as well as GLP-1 uptake among the U.S. consumer base. That seems to be reflected both in the growing demand for products aligned with the values of today’s shopper, according to experts cited by Barkho.
“GLP-1 medications are accelerating trends that are already building. For one, people on these medications are becoming far more intentional about what their meals actually contain,” said Renata Medeiros, head of food, beverage and agribusiness Americas at ING. Medeiros noted that upstart competitors — like the aforementioned Goodles and Banza — had gone beyond simply taking advantage of a niche, but rather put the task to legacy players by focusing on “taste and convenience over function.”
“These types of reformulations have become a go-to strategy for many legacy brands, in order to continue competing. It’s a dilemma that many legacy consumer packaged goods conglomerates are facing, as they deal with economic challenges, inflation and changing diet preferences,” Barkho wrote.
And with private label competitors eroding the pricing (and oftentimes quality) argument for legacy name brands as newcomers aimed at taste-forward wellness-oriented target another differentiator, brands like Kraft Heinz are working apace to keep their market share intact.
“The response from established CPG companies has been predictable but necessary. Reformulate, repackage and reposition,” Medeiros concluded.
BrainTrust
Carlos Arámbula
Principal, Growth Genie Partners
Mohamed Amer, PhD
Strategy Advisor, CEO & Co-Founder, BridgeCommAI
Tanya Thorson
Revenue & Customer Growth Leader, StrategiX Marketing
Recent Discussions
Discussion Questions
Are ‘better-for-you’ product tweaks enough to anchor Kraft Heinz’s turnaround efforts? What other elements should the company be focused on?
Do you believe it likely that Kraft Heinz will lose market share, despite best efforts under new leadership, due to competition on the price and wellness fronts? Why or why not?
How appealing do you find Kraft Heinz’s new products? Do you think they will resonate with a broader consumer audience?
Poll
Loading …
Like a lot of big CPG players, the problem for Kraft Heinz is that it hasn’t traditionally been all that innovative. That has left it vulnerable to a few current shifts in the market: the rise of smaller brands, the consumer trading to private label, and volume compression due to the cost of living crisis. As much as I think the better-for-you tweaks are sensible – and aligned with an area of growth – they are not particularly cutting edge. Indeed, at this stage they’re something of a defensive move. True product innovation needs to go beyond simple reformulation.
The “better-for-you” trend has been around for a while now, and protein especially seems to be having a moment across the industry. Even Starbucks recently rolled out protein drink options. For Kraft Heinz, this feels like a smart move to keep up with where consumer preferences are already heading.
The protein-added craze, though, is raising the price of fresh milk. The protein added to shelf stable products can sit there for many months, but the (protein, whey) is taken out of the current fresh milk supply. It’s not like Kraft is buying/raising cows to create their additives.
“Better-for-you” product tweaks… I’m going to play devil’s advocate here: I went through the PowerMac ingredients list, and I’m struggling to see how something with 20+ ingredients, some of which most of us can’t pronounce, qualifies as “better for you.”
I’m guessing the “Not-as-bad-for-you” approach ran a distant second with focus groups.
Exactly. They just jumped on the protein bandwagon. Meanwhile, Goodles (and others) are still more natural alternatives.
Georgeanne, you are right. 20+ ingredients and “better for you” is laughable. Versus Annie’s, 100% real cheese, organic pasta, and no artificial flavors, synthetic colors, or preservatives.
The new additives are supposed to be the good-for-you parts… which leaves obvious that the underlying product (which is still there!) is not.
Feels a bit like kids cereals (In the 1960s, as sweetened cereals surged in popularity, breakfast manufacturers faced heavy criticism for selling products with little to no nutritional value.)
Product reformulation confuses tactics with strategy. Beating quarterly estimates does not make a turnaround. Kraft Heinz’s real problem is structural. CEO Cahillane canceled the 2025 proposed split, but the underlying logic hasn’t changed. Grocery staples compete on price and operational efficiency. Condiments and sauces differentiate on taste and premium positioning. Those are fundamentally incompatible competitive postures under one roof, which is precisely why a breakup was, and should still be, on the table.
Now add a credibility problem. PowerMac’s protein and fiber numbers look good on the front of the box. The ingredient panel tells a different story. Health-intentional shoppers and GLP-1 users read labels deliberately. Goodles and Banza lead with ingredient integrity. PowerMac leads with macros bolted onto a highly processed base. Final score: a nutrition badge masquerading as a wellness product.
But… does it win over (or bamboozle) enough adults to start eating what normally they made for kids? To have it become a more family meal (aka sell more boxes).
Yes, I know that is a bit twisted. For people to feed the junk to their growing children, yet refrain from eating it themselves (not nutritious enough for adults).
Better-for-you needs to carry more weight than a protein claim.
Kraft Heinz is smart to respond to changing consumer behavior, but adding protein to a highly processed product does not automatically make it a wellness strategy. Consumers are getting more label-literate. They are looking past the front-of-box promise and asking what is actually inside.
PowerMac may create a new reason to notice the brand, but the bigger turnaround opportunity is deeper than reformulation. Kraft Heinz has scale, nostalgia, distribution, and pantry familiarity. The next move has to be ingredient credibility, taste, value, and products that fit how people actually live now.
Better-for-you cannot just sound better. It has to feel believable.
The question suffers from the way it was phrased: a tweak is not an anchor for a “turnaround”; so either they don’t need the latter, or the answer is “no”.
That having been said, is the effort ill advised…or even doomed? No, we just shouldn’t expect too much from it.
“Better-for-you” tweaks are necessary — but they are not sufficient.
What Kraft Heinz is confronting is bigger than reformulation. It’s a relevance challenge.
Wellness has evolved into a broader cultural expectation that now shapes mainstream purchasing behavior. Brands such as Goodles and Banza have gained traction by making wellness the price of entry while reframing the category around contemporary lifestyles, modern food values, and emotional connection.
Kraft Heinz’s strategic “better-for-you” moves are necessary because they help prevent iconic brands from becoming culturally dated. But the larger issue is whether Kraft Heinz can evolve these brands without losing the familiarity, comfort, and emotional equity that made them iconic in the first place.
The company will likely continue to face market share pressure from both private-label and culturally contemporary challenger brands. The competitive battle is no longer just about price or nutrition — it’s about relevance.
Ultimately, consumer response will depend on whether these launches are perceived as authentic brand evolution or simply incremental line extensions designed to defend shelf space.
Talk about late to the party. What would have been so difficult to have done this years ago? And like several others, I learned a long time ago that it’s not about what is in big bold print on the front of the pacage. It’s about what is in fine print in the ingrediants list. To shoppers who have been studying healthy diets, this is a shoulder shrug. And to many others it may provide a feel-good moment, but it’s not life changing. Nothing wrong with a little extra protein and fiber, but it seems like a too-late PR move around a what-took-so-long product update.
Kraft Heinz is not alone in addressing tweaks to foods based on consumer shifts. But there are differences between wellness and dietary/lifestyle shifts, and the two can have different paths. Kraft and other CPG’s who tweak recipes like adding protein powder into the famous Mac & Cheese may create more confusion around the brand, and find their customers didn’t want the original to change no matter how focused they are on wellness. In other words, leave Mac & Cheese alone and customers will enjoy it as it is, even while on a greater wellness journey. I believe most of these products are novelties that are flash in the pan failures.
More Discussions
Is Old Navy in Trouble as Gap Shares Fall ~17%, or Is This a Hiccup?
Investors appear skeptical on Gap’s recent efforts, but are recent hiccups merely temporary?How Important Is Reddit to Brand and Retail Success Concerning Today’s (and Tomorrow’s) Shopper?
It’s no secret that Reddit is one of the most popular social media platforms today, having…As Foot Locker’s ‘Fast Break’ Strategy Pays Off, What’s the Next Play?
With Foot Locker’s initial strategy showing results, what’s the next step?
Like a lot of big CPG players, the problem for Kraft Heinz is that it hasn’t traditionally been all that innovative. That has left it vulnerable to a few current shifts in the market: the rise of smaller brands, the consumer trading to private label, and volume compression due to the cost of living crisis. As much as I think the better-for-you tweaks are sensible – and aligned with an area of growth – they are not particularly cutting edge. Indeed, at this stage they’re something of a defensive move. True product innovation needs to go beyond simple reformulation.
The “better-for-you” trend has been around for a while now, and protein especially seems to be having a moment across the industry. Even Starbucks recently rolled out protein drink options. For Kraft Heinz, this feels like a smart move to keep up with where consumer preferences are already heading.
The protein-added craze, though, is raising the price of fresh milk. The protein added to shelf stable products can sit there for many months, but the (protein, whey) is taken out of the current fresh milk supply. It’s not like Kraft is buying/raising cows to create their additives.
“Better-for-you” product tweaks… I’m going to play devil’s advocate here: I went through the PowerMac ingredients list, and I’m struggling to see how something with 20+ ingredients, some of which most of us can’t pronounce, qualifies as “better for you.”
I’m guessing the “Not-as-bad-for-you” approach ran a distant second with focus groups.
Exactly. They just jumped on the protein bandwagon. Meanwhile, Goodles (and others) are still more natural alternatives.
Georgeanne, you are right. 20+ ingredients and “better for you” is laughable. Versus Annie’s, 100% real cheese, organic pasta, and no artificial flavors, synthetic colors, or preservatives.
The new additives are supposed to be the good-for-you parts… which leaves obvious that the underlying product (which is still there!) is not.
Feels a bit like kids cereals (In the 1960s, as sweetened cereals surged in popularity, breakfast manufacturers faced heavy criticism for selling products with little to no nutritional value.)
Product reformulation confuses tactics with strategy. Beating quarterly estimates does not make a turnaround. Kraft Heinz’s real problem is structural. CEO Cahillane canceled the 2025 proposed split, but the underlying logic hasn’t changed. Grocery staples compete on price and operational efficiency. Condiments and sauces differentiate on taste and premium positioning. Those are fundamentally incompatible competitive postures under one roof, which is precisely why a breakup was, and should still be, on the table.
Now add a credibility problem. PowerMac’s protein and fiber numbers look good on the front of the box. The ingredient panel tells a different story. Health-intentional shoppers and GLP-1 users read labels deliberately. Goodles and Banza lead with ingredient integrity. PowerMac leads with macros bolted onto a highly processed base. Final score: a nutrition badge masquerading as a wellness product.
But… does it win over (or bamboozle) enough adults to start eating what normally they made for kids? To have it become a more family meal (aka sell more boxes).
Yes, I know that is a bit twisted. For people to feed the junk to their growing children, yet refrain from eating it themselves (not nutritious enough for adults).
Better-for-you needs to carry more weight than a protein claim.
Kraft Heinz is smart to respond to changing consumer behavior, but adding protein to a highly processed product does not automatically make it a wellness strategy. Consumers are getting more label-literate. They are looking past the front-of-box promise and asking what is actually inside.
PowerMac may create a new reason to notice the brand, but the bigger turnaround opportunity is deeper than reformulation. Kraft Heinz has scale, nostalgia, distribution, and pantry familiarity. The next move has to be ingredient credibility, taste, value, and products that fit how people actually live now.
Better-for-you cannot just sound better. It has to feel believable.
The question suffers from the way it was phrased: a tweak is not an anchor for a “turnaround”; so either they don’t need the latter, or the answer is “no”.
That having been said, is the effort ill advised…or even doomed? No, we just shouldn’t expect too much from it.
“Better-for-you” tweaks are necessary — but they are not sufficient.
What Kraft Heinz is confronting is bigger than reformulation. It’s a relevance challenge.
Wellness has evolved into a broader cultural expectation that now shapes mainstream purchasing behavior. Brands such as Goodles and Banza have gained traction by making wellness the price of entry while reframing the category around contemporary lifestyles, modern food values, and emotional connection.
Kraft Heinz’s strategic “better-for-you” moves are necessary because they help prevent iconic brands from becoming culturally dated. But the larger issue is whether Kraft Heinz can evolve these brands without losing the familiarity, comfort, and emotional equity that made them iconic in the first place.
The company will likely continue to face market share pressure from both private-label and culturally contemporary challenger brands. The competitive battle is no longer just about price or nutrition — it’s about relevance.
Ultimately, consumer response will depend on whether these launches are perceived as authentic brand evolution or simply incremental line extensions designed to defend shelf space.
Talk about late to the party. What would have been so difficult to have done this years ago? And like several others, I learned a long time ago that it’s not about what is in big bold print on the front of the pacage. It’s about what is in fine print in the ingrediants list. To shoppers who have been studying healthy diets, this is a shoulder shrug. And to many others it may provide a feel-good moment, but it’s not life changing. Nothing wrong with a little extra protein and fiber, but it seems like a too-late PR move around a what-took-so-long product update.
Kraft Heinz is not alone in addressing tweaks to foods based on consumer shifts. But there are differences between wellness and dietary/lifestyle shifts, and the two can have different paths. Kraft and other CPG’s who tweak recipes like adding protein powder into the famous Mac & Cheese may create more confusion around the brand, and find their customers didn’t want the original to change no matter how focused they are on wellness. In other words, leave Mac & Cheese alone and customers will enjoy it as it is, even while on a greater wellness journey. I believe most of these products are novelties that are flash in the pan failures.