
©kupicoo via Canva.com
October 18, 2024
Does the Supply Chain Deserve a Higher C-Level Priority?
Back-to-back hurricanes and the short-lived strike at East and Gulf Coast ports offered more evidence to some that the supply chain deserves a more prominent C-suite role.
Sustainability goals have also elevated the supply chain as a C-level priority, but supply chain disruption is expected to continue as climate change leads to natural disasters like droughts, hurricanes, and wildfires becoming more frequent and unfolding in more locations, while increasing instances of extreme heat destroys crops. Research from Duke professors further suggests that the chance of experiencing a pandemic similar to COVID-19 in one’s lifetime has increased to about 38%, in part due to climate change.
A more volatile geo-political environment also carries greater risks of frequently rerouted trade flow in the future as exemplified by Western tariffs and import restrictions facing China, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and shipping diversions caused by Houthi rebel attacks in the Red Sea.
Professors at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business stated in a recent Harvard Business Review article that CEOs with a supply chain background could help more proactively address potential supply chain challenges. Their research found that firms led by CEOs with supply chain management experience were more effective at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in driving profitability.
While rare, the number of CEOs with high-level work experience in supply chain roles has increased since 2010, the researchers found. Of those CEOs, the most prominent is Apple’s Tim Cook, who held supply chain management roles at Compaq and IBM. Other CEOs in the consumer space with supply chain leadership experience include Target’s Brian Cornell and Walmart’s Doug McMillon; David Taylor and AG Lafley, both former Procter & Gamble CEOs; and Mark Parker, Nike’s former CEO.
In recent years, many companies have elevated the position of supply chain officer to the executive level, placing it alongside traditional executive roles in finance, marketing, and IT. This shift is driven by supply chain disruptions and the reimagining of supply chains as revenue-generating “value drivers” rather than just cost centers. A Wall Street Journal article from 2021 said companies are using “advanced digital technologies, virtualized data, and cobots [collaborative robots] to transform supply chain cost centers into customer-focused, value-driving networks.”
On a McKinsey podcast last year, Radu Palamariu, managing director of Asia–Pacific and Europe at Alcott Global, an executive search firm specializing in the supply chain industry, said that traditionally, supply chain leaders were only called into board meetings when problems arrived, but greater attention at the C-level is required to build resilience, flexibility, and agility across supply chains. He said, “There are always going to be issues, and I think that will never go away — supply chain actually is a competitive advantage.”
In a column for IMD Business School, Carlos Cordon, professor of strategy and supply chain management at the institute, said companies might want to consider acquisitions to de-risk supply chain vulnerabilities, citing Amazon’s development of in-house supply chain and logistics operations as an example.
A recent EY Supply Chain Survey of 347 U.S. supply chain leaders, however, found 88% reporting that their C-suite considers the supply chain a cost center, signaling a shift in attitudes back to pre-pandemic views. Of the respondents, 28% cited cost reduction as one of the current top three priorities.
“The series of supply chain shocks that started with the pandemic elevated the role of supply chain leaders in the C-suite, but executive teams are increasingly reverting to outdated views of the supply chain as a cost center rather than a growth engine,” said Ashutosh Dekhne, EY Americas supply chain & operations practice leader. “Our research uncovered concerning perception gaps between supply chain and C-suite executives around the value of supply chain, the digital maturity of supply chains and the value of cross-collaboration.”
Discussion Questions
Should the supply chain function for retailers rank on equal footing at the C-level as more traditional finance, marketing, merchandising, and IT roles?
Should retailers and brands be looking at supply chain more as “a cost center rather than a growth engine” with the pandemic’s resolution?
Poll
BrainTrust
Perry Kramer
Managing Partner, Retail Consulting Partners
Ricardo Belmar
Retail Transformation Thought Leader, Advisor, & Strategist
Shep Hyken
Chief Amazement Officer, Shepard Presentations, LLC
Recent Discussions








Supply chains are a critical aspect of any retail business. As we saw during the pandemic, and in many crises since, disruption or problems in the supply chain have a huge knock-on impact to the rest of the business. So, yes, this is an area that deserves to be a priority in the C-suite, in terms of both assessing risks and innovating to streamline to reduce costs and improve efficiency. I think a post pandemic issue has been that as supply chains normalized, they went back to being a more ‘invisible’ part of the business as far as the C-suite is concerned.
The classic Futurama line, “when you’re doing your job right, no one can tell you’re doing anything at all,” is the dilemma for logistics and procurement. Pre-pandemic stability (for the most part) led to complacency and ever more elaborate supply chains and outsourcing – out of sight, out of mind if it didn’t encounter trouble and saved a few more points. Robust logistics, however, takes time, attention, and investment – and makes the company a survivor when times get tough or weird. As one of my logistics professors said, “pay something now to do it right, or pay a whole lot more later to fix your mistakes – but you aren’t going to get out of paying.”
There is no question in my mind that the supply chain needs to be a high priority at the C suite. Supply, inventory, and shelf stock might in fact be the most important factor at retail, especially brick and mortar.
We can all agree that supply chain management activities and outcomes warrant executive attention, especially in retail and brick-and-mortar operations where inventory and shelf stock are crucial; however, its difficult for me to understand the premise that CEOs should have extensive supply chain experience. So long as there is a resourced team and an appropriate governance structure (at the executive and Board level), adequate attention and resources should be effectively applied.
110% agree that the supply chain function for retailers should have equal footing at the C-level with the more traditional roles. For most successful retail organizations this organizational hierarchy is already in place. Where the position continues to mature is in having a clear title and consistent organizational scope of responsibility. This will continue to evolve as the AI grows, automation grows, and the last mile turns into the last sprint able distance.
Is supply chain worthy of the C-suite? Yes, 100%. Strong supply chain management is a competitive advantage for retailers and brands, not just a cost center. It’s unfortunate to see this “cost center” centric viewpoint returning in mindshare. The most successful retailer and brands will resist this temptation and continue to value their supply chain leaders as the competitive advantage they continually demonstrate themselves to be under adverse conditions.
While the CEO doesn’t need to make the decisions about the supply chain strategy, they need to understand that any problems, regardless of why, will reflect on their leadership. If they don’t have the background to make decisions to deal with issues, they must surround themselves with the people who do. And regardless of whether these people succeed or fail, the responsibility falls to the CEO. Afterall, there’s a reason the word “Chief” is in their title.
The complexity of a modern retail supply chain would have been difficult to imagine 15 years ago. The expansion of distribution models, home delivery, consignments, drop shipping, just to name a few has made a huge impact.
The risk being managed by the supply chain organisation is enormous – errors can result in too much inventory – tying up working capital – or missing customer delivery commitments. The supply chain team is responsible for not just the ‘customer promise’ but also the ‘shareholder promise’. Consequently it is a key source of differentiation to both audiences.
For these reasons, many would find it unfathomable that supply chain should not have representation at C-level.
A Supply Chain Officer in the C-Suite is a must today. We have arrived at a moment where there is no longer “disruption” in supply chains, that disruption is ongoing and permanent. Issues include climate change, shipping lanes affected by conflict, geopolitics, changing tariffs, regulatory issues, and the constant change in consumer journeys. More channels and more ways to buy more things require flexible, visible, and option-filled supply chain. There is complexity in all six “Mega-Processes” PLAN-MAKE-BUY-MOVE-STORE-SELL. How could you not have a SC C-suite member?
I think we all agree that supply chain is important, but the bigger question is where does the function sit within the enterprise? Does the Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO) report to the CFO, COO or CEO? I’ve seen many companies align it with the CFO, looking at it as more of a cost center than a competitive weapon. With today’s advances in technology, especially, how AI can quickly find insights against large chunks of data, supply chain should be viewed as a means of advantage. The CSCO should be using these data to mitigate risk and create new ways of working that drive strategic value streams.
There is no question that supply chain operations are among the most critical elements of any business, and its leaders deserve a seat within the C-suite. With an optimized supply chain, retailers and brands could drive growth, outstanding customer experiences, and a seamless journey across physical and digital channels. In a post-pandemic world, the perception of supply chain organizations has shifted from a cost function to a critical operation that drives growth, unlocks value, and is a crucial element of any business transformation.
Being out of stock isn’t acceptable to today’s consumers. Retailers must have reliable inventory systems to support increased promotions and shifting demands throughout the year. Global economic challenges, such as supply chain issues and geopolitical conflicts, have impacted product availability. By investing in real-time inventory tracking capabilities, retailers can ensure they plan carefully to avoid stockouts and meet demand while helping to support better demand forecasting in the future.
Investing in last-mile delivery solutions through partnerships with logistics providers or developing in-house capabilities can also improve customer satisfaction during high-demand periods.
Supply chains drive profitability and customer loyalty. Period. I worry about any retail or FMCG brand that is debating the role of the function having equal footing with finance, marketing, merchandising, and IT. AI-driven visibility and resilience now drive competitive advantage in the function and within its key systems of record. Growth Engine all the way!!
Yes. Next question.
And, while we are at it, a word on the marketing function. The last time I checked the CMO position was the shortest tenured in the C-suite of ANY industry. Perhaps these two functions should be linked somehow…supply chain gives marketing some needed (at times) “real world” credibility while marketing gives some needed market awareness to the operational function of the supply chain head.
Just a wild idea!