
iStock.com/Liudmila Chernetska
August 1, 2024
What Does Google Keeping Cookies Mean for Advertising?
In a major reversal, Google announced last week that its Chrome web browser would continue to accept third-party cookies — the digital codes that let websites track where you’ve been on the internet — after four years of trying to develop a system without them.
Instead of eliminating cookies, Google “will be introducing a user-choice prompt, which will allow users to choose whether to retain third party cookies,” according to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which has been overseeing Google’s plan to discontinue cookies. Chrome users can already choose to block cookies in the browser’s settings.
There aren’t details on exactly how the prompt will work, as Google said it is “proposing” a new approach, and the CMA plans to accept comments on the change for a few weeks.
In a blog post, Google said that through testing, it realized that killing off third-party cookies in its browser transition required “significant work by many participants” and would impact publishers, advertisers, and virtually anyone involved in online advertising. Anthony Chavez, VP of Privacy Sandbox, Google’s project to replace cookies, said, “We’re discussing this new path with regulators, and will engage with the industry as we roll this out.”
Google’s move to end cookies in Chrome, the world’s most popular web browser and the only major one that still supports cookies, has experienced several delays as both digital advertising companies and regulators objected to the plan and Google’s proposed replacement technologies.
Beyond new privacy risks, concerns include the potential of harming competition and unfairly benefiting Google’s own advertising business. If many consumers block cookies, some industry executives told the Wall Street Journal that Google’s search and YouTube ad business stand to benefit because they rely more on internal company data than cookies.
Some digital agencies may be relieved since the elimination of cookies was expected to drive down online ad prices, as cookies enable a higher level of cross-site personalization, targeted advertising, and website analytics. Research by UK-based digital identity resolution vendor Acxiom earlier this year also found that only 55% of marketers had yet prepared their adtech and martech stacks for an internet without third-party cookies.
Advertisers, adtech companies, and web publishers may also reconsider their rush to collect their own first-party data on consumers, as well as investments in retail media.
“Many retailers might have believed that their first party data would be hugely valuable in a cookie free world. Now those views will have to be revisited,” Colin Lewis, director at Retail Media Works, told Internet Retailing. “Many RMNs [retail media networks] will now be asking themselves what price to change for their first party audiences — and, whatever the price and forecast revenues for those, how much should it be reduced.”
Lewis added, “For agencies, they can still say to clients for the time being that Chrome users will provide excellent signals — something long since gone from Apple. For brands, time will tell whether they will shift budgets or not.”
Dimitrios Koromilas, director of EMEA platform services at Acxiom, told TechTarget, “Even with Google’s latest decision on cookies, first-party data remains the new currency across the enterprise, not just for the marketing department. Gathering information to create a holistic view of your customer base, which can only be done with first-party data, is pivotal in helping businesses stand out from an increasingly competitive crowd.”
Discussion Questions
How should brands and retailers react to Google’s decision not to remove third-party tracking cookies from the Chrome browser?
Is the move a blow to retail media and the value of first-party data?
Is Google’s decision not to discontinue third-party cookies from the Chrome browser good or bad for retailers’ and brands’ bottom lines?
Poll
BrainTrust
Peter Charness
Retail Strategy - UST Global
James Tenser
Retail Tech Marketing Strategist | B2B Expert Storytelling™ Guru | President, VSN Media LLC
Dick Seesel
Principal, Retailing In Focus LLC
Recent Discussions








This will come as a relief to the online advertising industry. That said, users will still be given the option to block cookies so this means their usage will become patchier and advertisers will have to circumvent this. The biggest impact will be on retargeting style adverts, which often have better conversions because they’re based on things consumers are potentially interested in. However, my sense is that most brands are prepared for this: other browsers block cookies and many consumers have already opted out, so most companies have alternative methods of data gathering and serving relevant ads.
Call me cynical, but I can’t believe Google can allow an “opt out” but finds it too much work for everyone to remove this “revenue rich” functionality. Let’s see set everyone to opt out …cookies gone……set all 3rd party cookies with a retention of zero….cookies gone. I think it’s more of a case of lose those cookies, loose a bunch of advertising income. Nah – must have been a lot of work.
Three years of rolling announcements about the looming onset of “cookie deprecation” and it has come to this? An opt-out button?
The growing threat of retail media networks to its money-making machine may be the critical factor. Since RMNs have the ability to leverage retailers’ own shopper loyalty and transaction data, the elimination of cookies could put Google at a relative disadvantage.
Seems like the “Don’t be evil” team couldn’t work out a pathway to put users ahead of shareholders. Or is it that the advertising complex at large isn’t inventive enough to construct a new paradigm where consumers own and control (and get paid for sharing) their own data? I’ve been shouting about “personal data vaults” since the blockchain was invented. Still waiting….
Great points- I’m sure the definition of “evil” is open for interpretation, especially when it comes to advertising and consumer tracking.
If I’m not mistaken, what we’ll see more of is the type of choice menu one encounters when accessing EU domiciled sites: you pretty much choose all (allow everthing) or nothing (only technical cookies). Assuming most people want the latter, it will be up to Chrome (Google) to decide if it wants to present the choice in a clear way, or deceive users into some other path.
For advertisers, Google’s “newest” direction makes it necessary to reassess their approach – – again! I believe – – for obvious reasons – – that many brands have invested in solutions without cookies over the last few years.
Advertisers need to continue to adopt a multipurpose strategy to stay ahead of the unsteady changes, non-changes, and change-backs. An industry person that I spoke to concurred with another that first-party data strategies and server-side tagging might even provide advantages.
For example, server-side tagging offers enhanced control over data collection and processing, reducing dependence on client-side technologies. Similarly, maintaining a first-party dataset enables personalized marketing irrespective of third-party cookie availability.
Advertisers need to remain flexible but also proactive, integrating tools of the near future, and evolving strategies, to navigate future challenges and develop more resilient marketing strategies for effective ad performance. – Db
I can hear the choruses of “told you so” from cynical Google watchers. Consumers who are really interested in this issue and don’t want to be tracked are already using Firefox, Brave, or even Safari. Brands are already aware that their data from third-party cookies is sketchy and have pivoted to opted-in first-party data. For retailers, the focus should be on their customer relationships, managing their CRMs and serving customers who opt-in to sharing their data.
Stupid ads based on the website your just visited served up to you that make no impact on your purchasing decision…ARE SO BACK BABY!!!
So much $ spent on these ads, helped out with the usual suspects of SEO consultants, agencies and others. In the end this does not matter because who pays attention to any of it?
First party data is still the way to go and those who employ it will have a distinct advantage over those that do not.
Unless and until Google sees a serious erosion of Chrome’s market share, there is no financial benefit to a stricter cookie policy. (And outside of the Apple ecosystem, Chrome has no serious competition.) It’s going to take a more proactive decision by Chrome users — to opt out of cookies on their own — for Google to change direction.