
iStock.com/Althom
May 23, 2024
Is Lululemon’s Chief Product Officer Exit a Big Blow?
Lululemon Athletica Inc. announced a new organizational structure across its product, brand, and merchandise teams following the departure of its acclaimed chief product officer, Sun Choe.
The company does not intend to replace the chief product officer role.
The yoga-themed retailer said in a statement, “The strategic organizational changes are intended to support the company’s near- and long-term growth plans, accelerate product innovation, and further enable its go-to-market strategies.”
Under the new structure, Jonathan Cheung, who only joined Lululemon as global creative director in January, will report to CEO Calvin McDonald and continue to oversee design, innovation, and product development. He previously reported to Choe.
Cheung has more than 30 years of design experience, including a stint as Levi’s SVP of design and design innovation and more recently consulting for brands like Gap, Mattel, Merrell, and Pangaia.
Lululemon also reset its merchandising and brand functions to scale its global and regional go-to-market strategies. Nikki Neuburger, a former Nike veteran who joined Lululemon as chief brand officer in January 2020, becomes chief brand & product activation officer, overseeing merchandising, footwear, and product operations, in addition to her current responsibilities leading brand. Elizabeth Binder, chief merchandising officer, reports to Neuburger.
Choe, who joined Lululemon as SVP of merchandising in December 2016 and has been chief product officer since 2018, is leaving the retailer later this month to pursue another unspecified opportunity.
Lululemon’s sales have grown four-fold over Choe’s tenure, with the chain’s success attributed by many to its string of breakout products. Speaking last year to Yahoo Finance, Adrienne Yih, Barclays’ analyst, said, “They never stop innovating. They never think they have enough. They never think they’re winning enough.”
The departure comes just months after Lululemon warned of a softer consumer in the U.S. and reported slower sales in North America in Q4. McDonald said on an analyst call on March 21, “Within the U.S., we’re navigating what we see as a dynamic retail environment and a consumer that’s a little bit softer. But there are a lot of areas that we are focused on and we know can continue to drive our business, that being product innovation and the unaided awareness, which, in the U.S. is still very, very low.”
Net sales at the company still rose more than 15% in the holiday quarter, with Americas up 9%, but investors have long worried about competition within the athleisure category.
Shares fell 7.2% Wednesday on the news of Choe’s departure and have declined about 40% since the start of the year.
On Thursday, Barclays’ Yih in a note called the resignation an “incrementally negative data point,” cautioning that alterations in current assortments to lure more customers could “take longer to course-correct than initially thought.”
Raymond James analyst Rick Patel in a note stated that Choe’s exit added to the “wall of worry” for investors in the near term.
Wedbush’s analyst Tom Nikic said investors are particularly concerned that newcomers such as Alo Yoga and Vuori are causing Lululemon’s U.S. growth to slow. Nikic wrote in a note, “Clearly, the narrative around the company has worsened, and as a result, we no longer think LULU will command the valuation multiples it has achieved in recent years.”
In the press release announcing Choe’s departure, Lululemon’s McDonald said, “We are grateful for Sun’s many contributions to the company over the past seven years, and she leaves us as a stronger, product-led organization with dynamic leaders ready to take us forward. Looking ahead, I am confident in the strength of our Design, Merchandising, and Brand teams, and excited by how the new structure will enable us to solve for the unmet needs of our guests in a more efficient, unique, and powerful way.”
Discussion Questions
Will Lululemon’s new organizational structure help compensate for the loss of Sun Choe as chief product officer?
Should Choe’s departure add to investors’ concerns about Lululemon losing momentum in North America?
Poll
BrainTrust
David Spear
President, Retail, OrderlyMeds
Brad Halverson
Principal, Clearbrand CX
Shelley E. Kohan
Associate Professor, Fashion Institute of Technology
Recent Discussions








Not a blow to the entirety of Lululemon’s strategy, but certainly a great shame and a risk – if only because under Choe the track record of Lulu in product has been very strong. The worrying thing is that her departure comes at a time when Lulu is up against some tougher numbers and some more intense headwinds. That said, I think the company can power through if it keeps its focus on customers and innovation, and doesn’t underestimate the importance of product development which is the lifeblood of repeat purchases and selling at high prices. Lulu will be the poorer without Choe’s magic touch.
Lululemon’s new organizational structure is designed to mitigate the impact of Sun Choe’s departure as chief product officer. The roles have been reassigned to Jonathan Cheung, overseeing product design, and Nikki Neuburger, managing merchandising and product operations. This restructuring aims to maintain Lululemon’s product innovation and operational efficiency. However, its success in fully compensating for Choe’s departure will depend on how well these new leaders execute their roles and maintain the company’s competitive edge.
Choe’s departure as chief product officer at Lululemon may indeed add to investors’ concerns about the company’s momentum in North America. As a key figure in product innovation and brand direction, her absence could impact Lululemon’s ability to maintain its market leadership and growth in the region.
There’s no doubt that it is a significant loss. However, COVID and its consequences were key factors in the massive sales waves we saw at numerous companies and though no one can deny her talent, some of her success was in part due to her incredible ability to position herself and Lulu to ride a wave she did not have a direct hand in creating. Unfortunately, tsunamis pull back and I’m sorry we won’t get a chance to watch her talent navigate the pull back. It’s not easy catching big waves but paddling out to catch the next one is no picnic either!
I’m sure the new executive team will do a great job addressing the challenges they’re facing, both the organic ones and the ones from the natural consequences of an unprecedented, perfect storm of factors. I’m not a Lulu gear fan but I am a fan of successful companies, great brands and talented management teams; I wish them great success in rearchitecting the future of Lululemon.
It seems from afar that the moves at Lululemon Athletica is overkill because even with slow sales in the U.S. the international business grew sales by 56% in this past quarter.
Analysts are suggesting that the war between athleisure and wider-leg pants will bring more challenges to the company.
Lululemon is a cult-like favorite especially for its colorful yoga leggings. I’m not sure that all consumers though are aware of the offerings for golf, tennis, running, pickleball, gymnastics, and other athletics. The brand also includes low-key accessories and casual wear like high rise joggers. Db
The brand will carry on under the strong leadership and direction of Nikki Neuburger, Lululemon should focus efforts on continued innovations, especially in fiber developments and design aspects. They need a competitive advantage to drive away intense competition from both direct and indirect competitors.
Lululemon has been on a roll for nearly a decade now, cranking out great looking, well fitting and functional clothing for both women and men. Choe is to be commended for her strong run and although she will be missed, it’s encouraging many on the product, merchandising and brand leadership team are staying, in new roles.
Looking forward, Lululemon will want to evaluate where additional value can come from new designs and product iterations since work from home is part of the work week for many, and casual personal wear is continuing to evolve in the post pandemic era.
Any change in a successful formula will have an impact, even if in the short-term. Lululemon has earned a market-dominating run in the market, but with more competition and equally innovative new brands, there should be concern. I see many of these category brands leaning heavily into sneakers, however,I do caution a deviation from their core product and mission. The key to continued longevity is for Lululemon to keep the influencer/advocates on board.
Certainly, innovators like Sun Choe are always deemed a loss when these high-profile departures occur, but it doesn’t mean that the new team can’t run with the ball they now own. What’s made Lululemon so unique and fresh is their innovative line of products. They’ve owned the athleisure space, and the new team has the DNA and confidence to bring a whole new line of innovation to the market. Looking forward to the next chapter of success!
Great organizations who have worked hard on building all the right skill sets and prioritized true inner-silo and cross-silo teamwork can survive the loss of a great quarterback. It’s painful, but it’s also inevitable for one reason or another. I suspect Lululemon has been practicing all of the above. The emergence of stronger and stronger competition was inevitable. The slowing of their growth rate was inevitable. This is not hand-wringing stuff. Lululemon is a clear market leader and will be a clear market leader for the foreseeable future. A leader with competition who is growing stronger all the time. Lululemon taught the market well.
LULU’s current stock multiple is 24, down from about 50. The stock price is about $300, down from $511. So the market is digesting all these dynamics in stride. A PE multiple of 50 for an apparel stock was never sustainable. Investors had every right to be concerned about share price downside and that has now been realized. But a share price decline from crazy multiple to reasonable multiple is not necessarily the sign of a brand in trouble. The loss of irrational exuberance is not a bad thing.
LuluLemon is well past a point where one executive leaving puts the business in jeopardy. This represents a very minor speed bump that will quickly be forgotten.