white and blue magnetic card
Photo by Avery Evans on Unsplash

Are ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ Services Helpful or Harmful to Retail?

In recent years, “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) services have surged in popularity, offering consumers the flexibility to make purchases and spread payments over time. While BNPL is touted as a convenient solution, the reality for some users has been far from rosy.

Essentially, BNPL allows shoppers to split their purchases into installments, often with minimal or no interest. For many, especially those facing financial constraints, this option provides a lifeline when cash is tight. Tia Whiteside, a 27-year-old behavioral analyst, initially saw it as a convenient way to manage expenses. However, her experience quickly turned sour as she found herself accruing debt totaling thousands of dollars.

“I was just seeing my paycheck continually eaten up,” Whiteside said, “and I was like, ‘Where’s my money going?’”


The appeal of BNPL transcends income and credit levels, with users drawn to its promise of financial flexibility. Yet, as the popularity of these services has grown, so too have concerns about their potential pitfalls. Research has shown that BNPL users tend to overspend, often racking up additional fees and interest charges. Despite efforts to regulate the industry, the lack of uniform reporting to credit agencies complicates the assessment of borrowers’ financial health.

Social media platforms like Reddit have become forums for disillusioned BNPL users to share their stories and caution others against falling into the same trap.

A report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published last year indicates that most “BNPL borrowers had higher credit card utilization rates and lower credit scores” than non-BNPL borrowers. Per NBC News, “Many appeared to be leaning on the installment loans while also shouldering high rates on revolving credit card balances.”


Additionally, the report found that certain demographic groups, including Black and Hispanic consumers, are disproportionately impacted by the allure of BNPL. Female consumers were also 35% more likely than average to use BNPL services.

Amy Baird, for instance, found herself drowning in debt after years of indulging in BNPL for luxury purchases. “It caught up to me,” she told NBC News. “I had put myself in a pretty big hole,” she said, noting that she was able to find support in a subreddit focused on shopping addiction.

Critics argue that BNPL platforms, with their seamless payment processes and enticing promotions, enable impulsive spending behavior. The ease of clicking “purchase” can override rational decision-making, particularly during moments of fatigue or stress. While some platforms tout features aimed at promoting responsible spending, questions linger about their effectiveness in curbing excessive borrowing.

In response to mounting scrutiny, lawmakers have called for increased oversight of BNPL services to protect consumers from exploitation. However, the allure of convenience continues to lure many into the BNPL fold, despite the potential risks.

Meanwhile, in parts of Asia, BNPL has been booming in recent years, offering consumers a flexible payment alternative. According to Euromonitor International, the introduction of BNPL in 2018 sparked this surge, with providers now focusing on strategic partnerships, business model innovation, and ecosystem development.

Southeast Asian countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, with their sizable unbanked and underserved populations, present fertile ground for BNPL providers. The Philippines and Indonesia, in particular, boast unbanked populations of 76% and 67% respectively, with similar figures in Vietnam (47%), Malaysia (40%), and Thailand (25%). BNPL services have found appeal in bridging this financial gap.

Strategic partnerships have played a pivotal role in expanding the reach of BNPL services in the region. Collaborations with card operators, e-commerce platforms, digital wallets, and insurance companies have significantly broadened the user base and usage of BNPL services. For instance, partnerships like Atome Philippines’ collaboration with Mastercard and Traveloka PayLater’s cooperation with Bank BRI and Visa have propelled market presence and service utilization.

To overcome revenue and profitability challenges, BNPL business models have undergone a transformation. Implementing consumer charges and optimizing repayment terms have emerged as strategies to enhance revenue streams and operational efficiency. Shortening installment periods and exploring alternative funding sources, like acquiring banks or transitioning into digital banking operations, have become essential for long-term sustainability.

Despite the opportunities for growth, the absence of well-defined regulations in emerging markets poses challenges, particularly regarding credit risk. However, this environment also presents opportunities as BNPL gains traction among younger, unbanked, and underserved populations.

Euromonitor International suggests that BNPL could potentially emerge as the primary provider of financial products and services in these markets by understanding their unique needs and preferences. By positioning themselves as pioneers in shaping the financial landscape, fostering financial inclusion, and capitalizing on growth potential, BNPL players can seize the immense opportunities presented by these promising markets.

Discussion Questions

How can the retail industry balance using buy now, pay later services for convenience while avoiding consumer debt issues, especially after cases like Tia Whiteside’s?

What regulatory steps can the U.S. take regarding BNPL platforms to ensure responsible lending, protect consumers from financial harm, and improve credit reporting transparency?

As BNPL gains popularity in Southeast Asia, what insights can American retailers gain from the strategic partnerships and innovative business models driving its success in promoting financial inclusion and capitalizing on emerging market growth?

Poll

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders
Famed Member
11 days ago

BNPL is simply another form of credit. Money borrowed has to be paid back with interest and sometimes with fees. However, because it is so easy to use and circumvents many of the traditional credit checks that credit cards would require, it is very easy for some consumers to run up heavy debts. The forthcoming integration of BNPL into credit scores will help lenders make more informed decisions and manage risk better. This should nudge consumer behavior in the right direction and will also help younger consumers (who are heavy users of BNPL) build their credit scores. As for retailers, aside from the fact some discount the purchase price they charge to the lender, they don’t assume the risk so, to them, offering BNPL is just a way to boost sales. 

Bob Amster
Trusted Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders
11 days ago

Ditto.

David Biernbaum
Noble Member
11 days ago

Buy Now Pay Later is just another form of credit but usually without interest. It’s not unlike layover or will call, except in this case the consumer has the merchandise rather than the retailer having to store it.

The practice has never been uncommon in furniture stores, or even appliance scores.

It also isn’t much different than “ five easy payments” on infomercials or similar types of direct selling. It is definitely appealing to consumers who live paycheck to paycheck. -Db

Last edited 11 days ago by David Biernbaum
John Lietsch
Active Member
11 days ago

The good news is if you borrow too much, someone will gladly forgive your debt in exchange for your vote.
 
We’re a consumer driven economy and debt is a critical component of that so it’s hard to argue against most forms of debt. However, just like most things we make widely and easily available, there is a “certainty,” not a chance, that some people will take advantage and others will be taken advantage of.
 
BNPL doesn’t have the strict qualification requirements that credit cards do so one way to fix it is to force the same qualification requirements but that would defeat the purpose. Another way to control it could be to monitor the default rates of customers by retailer (and BNPL vendor) and fine those with higher rates (similarly to what Visa/MC do with chargeback rates). And, like it or not, it might be time to bring in the Big CRA Brothers (Credit Reporting Agencies).
 
Ironically, as mentioned in the article, the primary users of these services are more financially vulnerable. So who are we helping exactly? But, economies don’t grow on cash alone so debt, when used well, is a great and necessary mechanism for growth. Plus there are those that use debt, including “fun debt,” responsibly and we wouldn’t want to punish them. It’s a Credit Card’s edge – like a Razor’s Edge but pain is delivered in four equal, interest free installments. 

Last edited 11 days ago by John Lietsch
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
Noble Member
11 days ago

Do we really think retailers care about how much debt their customers carry? No, they just worry they won’t get paid; similarly, I don’t really care either… I just don’t want the taxpayers to be the ones taking up the payments. We don’t need another layer of regulation (to stop people from cutting themselves financially.)

Jenn McMillen
Active Member
11 days ago

Isn’t BNPL just reverse layaway, where the gratification is instant vs. anticipatory? Ostensibly a budgeting tool, BNPL is just another avenue for financially unsavvy consumers to get themselves into debt, while retailers reap the profits. I’m with Craig Sundstrom on this–retailers don’t care. Their mandate is “sell product, make money.” They will only start to pay attention if they stop getting paid. This is not an issue for more regulation around consumer protection; this is an issue about consumers’ overall financial illiteracy. Who is responsible for that?

Brett Wickard
Member
11 days ago

BNPL is both helpful and harmful for retailers (just as it is for consumers) — beneficial today at the expense of tomorrow. We’ve all experienced enough credit cycles to know when the music stops playing, there might not be enough seats. And a third party taking that credit risk doesn’t insulate the retailer from the greater macroeconomic impacts.

Jeff Sward
Noble Member
11 days ago

So tell me again…BNPL was a solution to what problem? Scarcity of available credit for people who needed credit but couldn’t qualify under normal rules? OK, we can do an end run around that. What could go wrong? And I’m not talking about buying a refrigerator and paying it off “interest free” in 12 easy payments. I’m talking about buying groceries and racking up even more debt that can’t be paid off any time soon. Don’t we already have record high credit card balances and default rates? This does not end well.

Cathy Hotka
Noble Member
11 days ago

It’s shocking that so many Americans are financially illiterate. Delaying a payment doesn’t mean that the payment won’t come due. Add interest to the mix and BNPL can be a real problem for some people. Tread carefully.

RachelRGS
11 days ago

BNPL is really what retailers are hoping is a Conversion driver. If a retailer can convert one more customer, it’s worth big $$$. Retailers are as addicted to dipping into the Conversion pool to generate more revenue on same traffic as consumers are to buy things they cannot afford.

Oliver Guy
Member
11 days ago

When I first joined the world of work and understood ‘factoring’ – where companies sell their debt to another company so they can reduce their days sales outstanding and improve their financials – I was amazed.
Some of the BNPL type offerings available today follow a similar model. Klarna has established quite a presence in some European markets – splitting payments over 3 months. But this is not new in retail – catalogue retailers have allowed monthly – or even weekly payments for many years. A UK retailer – Shop Direct – used to have catalogues under different banners which were laid out exactly the same but prices were different because one offered 0% weekly finance. Spoiler – the one that did not offer 0% finance had lower list prices.
Ultimately, someone is paying – in the Klarna type BNPL approach the retailer is foregoing some margin in fees to Klarna to close the sale – no discount is available for shoppers who pay immediately.
Arguably these approaches – whether third party or in house – help retailers. The third party schemes help the retailer close business today – although arguably the retailer is missing out on collecting data about the shoppers that the third party now has.
For the ‘in-house’ style approach, some banking type compliance may be required but retailers are attaining all the data on the customers.
Equally it is worthy of note that very few car manufacturers make money selling cars. Their money is made selling finance for the cars.

Brian Cluster
Active Member
10 days ago

Like many others said, BNPL is another form of credit. Employing this credit strategy does not make sense across all retail but can be a great way to build loyalty for particular customers. To give an example, think about household formation and families buying furniture. Having another option to buy a crib or baby furniture can really solve a problem and build a great bond with households that could be connected with your brand for some time. To prevent some of the bad outcomes associated with BNPL, perhaps retailers could provide more educational resources upfront for customers taking this credit option.

BrainTrust

"Ostensibly a budgeting tool, BNPL is just another avenue for financially unsavvy consumers to get themselves into debt, while retailers reap the profits."

Jenn McMillen

Chief Accelerant at Incendio & Forbes Contributing Writer


"The forthcoming integration of BNPL into credit scores will help lenders make more informed decisions…This should nudge consumer behavior in the right direction."

Neil Saunders

Managing Director, GlobalData


"BNPL doesn’t have the strict qualification requirements that credit cards do, so one way to fix it is to force the same requirements, but that would defeat the purpose."

John Lietsch

Chief Operating Officer, Bloo Kanoo