May 10, 2024

Photo by Ryoji Iwata on Unsplash

How Can Retailers Capitalize on Consumer Shopping Demographics?

Share: LinkedInRedditXFacebookEmail

Recent research from e-commerce consulting firm 2 Visions delves into consumer shopping habits, revealing intriguing insights into preferences across generations and regions.

According to 2 Visions, which surveyed 2,411 Americans between February and April 2024, 72.41% of consumers believe that online shopping offers more variety than traditional physical retail locations. However, in-store shoppers tend to perceive that physical stores have higher-quality goods than online platforms, with 77.08% favoring physical stores, while 53.85% of online shoppers believe online platforms offer better quality.

Meanwhile, the Northeast dominates the study in online-only purchasing, with 30.23% of consumers purchasing this way, possibly influenced by urban convenience and robust digital infrastructure.

A notable divergence appears concerning accessibility based on income levels. High-income earners enjoy near-universal access to shopping within 30 minutes, contrasting sharply with lower-income individuals — only 85.19% of consumers who earn less than $50K have the same shopping access. This income-based accessibility gap underscores significant economic disparities in consumer behavior.

Interestingly, hybrid shopping is favored among high earners with salaries over $100K, with 66.67% engaging in both online and in-store channels. Urban renters also benefit from better local shopping access compared to homeowners, likely attributable to their proximity to retail centers.

Gen Z stands out once again, reporting an exceptionally high desire for in-store experiences compared to other generations, with a 30.77% preference for physical shopping options. Additionally, they have a 76.47% satisfaction rating for their local shopping options.

These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of consumer shopping habits, influenced by generational preferences, regional dynamics, income disparities, and quality perceptions. Understanding these intricacies is crucial for retailers seeking to tailor strategies and adapt to evolving consumer demands in an ever-changing marketplace.

In recent corporate updates, CEOs and CFOs across major retail brands have highlighted strategic shifts toward off-mall locations. Macy’s CEO Tony Spring emphasized prioritizing small-format Macy’s outside of malls amidst plans to shutter around 150 underperforming stores. Bath & Body Works CFO Eva Boratto echoed this sentiment, noting progress in increasing off-mall presence as beneficial for the company. Foot Locker’s president and CEO, Mary Dillon, also acknowledged strides in shifting away from malls during the company’s latest earnings call.

Similarly, Signet Jeweler’s Chief Financial, Strategy, & Services Officer Joan Hilson recently revealed that the 114 stores that closed last year were mostly “lower-performing mall locations and U.K. stores,” emphasizing the stronger performance of off-mall outlets. Victoria’s Secret CFO Tim Johnson also highlighted successful off-mall ventures and plans to reduce mall exposure in certain markets.

However, amidst these trends, a report from the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) suggests that Gen Z consumers still view malls as social hubs, with 60% visiting for socializing rather than specific purchases.

Additionally, Asian American malls in the U.S. show promising signs of success, and shopping malls across the world that allure shoppers with grandeur or offer engaging experiences continue to thrive.

Consumers from the Gen Z demographic in particular remain firmly rooted in traditional retail experiences, bucking the trend toward virtual shopping realms. Experts attribute this to the generation’s desire for instant gratification, which drives them toward physical stores. Surveys indicate that Gen Z’s preference for in-person shopping matches, if not exceeds, their online habits. Malls, once deemed outdated, are now rejuvenated by Gen Z’s penchant for community-oriented spaces. With their substantial spending power, malls are banking on Gen Z’s patronage for sustained success. For Gen Z, in-store shopping offers the opportunity to try on items and enjoy a social outing, reflecting a desire for tangible experiences in an increasingly digital world.

Indeed, malls continue to serve as venues for social connections, offering entertainment options and a sense of community, particularly for young people in suburban or rural areas. Moreover, a PYMNTS Intelligence study commissioned by Visa Acceptance Solutions indicates that the majority of global consumers prefer engaging with physical retail locations at some point in their shopping journey, whether in-store or for online pickup.

This study surveyed thousands of consumers and merchants across seven countries. It identifies the rise of the “Click-and-Mortar” shopper, who expects digital conveniences in physical stores, constituting a significant portion of global shoppers. Retailers can cater to these evolving preferences by offering digital features like voice-assisted shopping and buy now, pay later options. While some regions are keeping pace with these demands, others lag behind due to various factors. However, failing to meet the expectations of Click-and-Mortar shoppers poses risks for retailers worldwide.

BrainTrust

"It's not black and white. Online is good for convenience and when buying a known item or replenishment. In my opinion, nothing replaces the in-store experience when done well."
Avatar of Pamela Kaplan

Pamela Kaplan

Principal, PK Consulting


"These confirm my POV that consumers shop different channels by situation – fulfilling ‘needs’ often come from online and ‘wants or aspirations’ are best experienced in person."
Avatar of Patricia Vekich Waldron

Patricia Vekich Waldron

Contributing Editor, RetailWire; Founder and CEO, Vision First


"If you’re a retailer that doesn’t take the time to understand the demographics of your customers, you’re missing a big opportunity – and making a mistake."
Avatar of Shep Hyken

Shep Hyken

Chief Amazement Officer, Shepard Presentations, LLC


Discussion Questions

What underlying factors might contribute to the stark contrast in shopping preferences between different income brackets?

In light of recent strategic shifts toward off-mall locations, what implications might this trend have for the future landscape of traditional shopping malls, particularly considering the enduring appeal of malls as social hubs for Gen Z consumers?

How can retailers adapt to meet the expectations of “Click-and-Mortar” shoppers, who seek seamless integration between online and in-store experiences, while also addressing differing perceptions of quality across shopping formats?

Poll

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders

There are a lot of statistics in this research but the main thing, for me, is that most consumers like to blend physical and online experiences. This isn’t really surprising as online is better at some things, and stores are superior at others. People use both to fulfil different missions and needs and retailers need to offer a seamless experience across multiple channels. 
 
The affinity Gen Z have to physical shopping is important and should be noted: there is a great deal of garbage written about how young consumers will all be shopping in virtual worlds in the future and none of it is grounded in evidence – it’s all hyperbolic speculation that ignores human nature. 

Last edited 1 year ago by Neil Saunders
Pamela Kaplan
Pamela Kaplan
Reply to  Neil Saunders

100% agree – Its not so black and white. Online is good for convenience and when buying a know item or replenishment. In m opinion, nothing replaces the in store experience when done well.

David Biernbaum

I am very “impressed” with Gen Z because unlike the Millennials, they enjoy getting off their butts and head to a real mall to socialize and shop! Gen Z, you make me proud. This gives me hope that one day in the future we might see the return of new regional indoor malls!
So how do retailer capitalize on consumer demographic shopping data? The obvious response is to put more retail stores in areas where Gen Z’s reside, for example, large apartment complexes, and in university towns.
I also advise promoting demographically. Know whom your consumer is, and geo-target your advertising, accordingly. Db

Last edited 1 year ago by David Biernbaum
Anil Patel
Anil Patel

Contrast in shopping preferences between different income brackets is driven by disparities in access to resources and disposable income. High-income earners have easier access to transportation and more spending power, allowing them to explore a wider range of shopping options. Conversely, low-income individuals often face limitations in both transportation and budget, leading them to prioritise convenience and affordability.

As for the trend toward off-mall locations, it is undoubtedly more convenient for shoppers. Young customers too would prefer to have shops nearby in the vicinity they live in. While malls continue to serve as social hubs for entertainment, the overall appeal may diminish as more retailers will start to embrace alternative formats that the customers are preferring. Moreover, this way retailers can cater to “click-and-mortar” shoppers with initiatives like Buy Online Pickup In Store, so that they can conveniently collect their item the same-day from a nearby store.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary

A little self-discovery around this. As I read it, it occurred to me that I really haven’t thought much about brick-and-mortar vs. digital in quite a while. What once consumed a ton of my retail headspace is now so accepted that I just assume that great retail includes a truly unified commerce approach to business- strong stores and great online experiences where customers can move between channels easily. Five years ago I was talking about the nonsense around the “retail apocalypse” and the predicted demise of the shopping. Now, the tables have turned with Gen Z; it’s just foolish to suggest that online is somehow in jeapordy.
What we’ve learned is customers want options. The decision to engage on one channel or another is personal and highly influenced by the product category. We also know that just shopping, what we used call “running errands” back in the day, for a lot of people is tedious and not particularly fun. Going to an entertainment and shopping venue on the other hand, to pick out a new outfit and go to a fun restaurant, lots of appeal.
The bottom line is that great retailers need to understand their products and their customers. They also need to provide ways for them to engage and they need to meet their customers where they want to be and where they want to shop. That’s what omnichannel was supposed to deliver and I find it a bit ironic that now that it’s here, we’re having trouble recognizing it and appreciating how far the industry has come.

Nicola Kinsella
Nicola Kinsella

What does GenZ have more of compared with Millennials and GenX? Time. It’s not surprising that they have a greater preference for in-store and mall experiences that offer social benefits as well. It will be interesting to see if this pattern remains as they get older, have families, and take on other responsibilities. Regardless of GenZ trends, a key factor for malls to survive will be offering other experiences that engage and provide for social interactions. And if GenZ remain mall visitors as they age, it will not just be experiences for the young, but also whole family experiences.

Jeff Sward

I think the conclusion of this is more subtle that just saying there are stark differences in opinions on shopping preferences. 72.4% say there is more variety on-line. Well of course there is more variety on line. I’m surprised that number isn’t bigger. 77.1% say that physical stores have better quality products. Is it that they have it, or the customer can actually see and feel and confirm the quality in real life…??? And these aren’t necessarily different people. The same person can say yes, there is more variety on-line, and yes, I then like to confirm quality in person. It’s the combination, the fusing, of the channels into one overall shopping/buying experience. Discovery is a process. And confirmation is a process. You can accomplish more discovery in an hour on-line than you can in a full day at the mall. And you can accomplish more confirmation in 5 minutes at the mall than you could in a lifetime on line. It’s not about “or”. It’s about “and”. It’s about how brands and retailers remove friction and fuse the channels.

Richard J. George, Ph.D.

Not surprisingly, this research indicates that most consumers prefer the option of shopping online or instore. The Gen Z findings may be surprising, but underscore the need for retailers to develop specific marketing strategies to attract these shoppers.

Pamela Kaplan
Pamela Kaplan

There is a lot of talk lately in the industry regarding “Retail is Dead” or “The mall is dead”. Why is everyone trying to kill the physical store? Can’t we all agree that it works when executed well. I find it refreshing to read positive news about Gen Z and physical shopping – hoorah

Scott Norris
Scott Norris
Reply to  Pamela Kaplan

With all these merchants saying they need to develop off-mall, it’s not as though they will open a store in the middle of a retail desert – stores need other stores, restaurants, and services nearby to justify a trip by car or transit and reduce the burden of running errands. So – it’s a main street / high street environment integrated with housing, schools, and community facilities that gives the best ROI, as they’re coming to realize. “We destroyed a lot of inner-city infrastructure, exacerbated poverty and racial disparities, and made climate change a lot worse in the rush to pave over exurban fields & build subdivisions, but for a generation we made a handful of property developers very, very rich.”

Patricia Vekich Waldron

It’s always interesting to get new data points. These confirm my POV that consumers shop different channels by situation – fulfilling ‘needs’ often come from online and ‘wants or aspirations’ are best experienced in person.

Shep Hyken

This is classic research that needs to come to life. There are often large differences between ages, income, gender, geography, ethnicity, etc. If you’re a retailer that doesn’t take the time to understand the demographics of your customers, you’re missing a bit opportunity – and making a mistake.

John Hennessy

The one thing this study tells me is that retailers who use the power of their purchase data will outperform those who address their audience using macro trends like this study.
Yes, there are differences among groups. But there are even more differences within groups.
Retailer data gives retailers and their suppliers the ability to target not on some group affiliation or assignment but on actual purchase behavior. That level customer targeting continues to be underutilized.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders

There are a lot of statistics in this research but the main thing, for me, is that most consumers like to blend physical and online experiences. This isn’t really surprising as online is better at some things, and stores are superior at others. People use both to fulfil different missions and needs and retailers need to offer a seamless experience across multiple channels. 
 
The affinity Gen Z have to physical shopping is important and should be noted: there is a great deal of garbage written about how young consumers will all be shopping in virtual worlds in the future and none of it is grounded in evidence – it’s all hyperbolic speculation that ignores human nature. 

Last edited 1 year ago by Neil Saunders
Pamela Kaplan
Pamela Kaplan
Reply to  Neil Saunders

100% agree – Its not so black and white. Online is good for convenience and when buying a know item or replenishment. In m opinion, nothing replaces the in store experience when done well.

David Biernbaum

I am very “impressed” with Gen Z because unlike the Millennials, they enjoy getting off their butts and head to a real mall to socialize and shop! Gen Z, you make me proud. This gives me hope that one day in the future we might see the return of new regional indoor malls!
So how do retailer capitalize on consumer demographic shopping data? The obvious response is to put more retail stores in areas where Gen Z’s reside, for example, large apartment complexes, and in university towns.
I also advise promoting demographically. Know whom your consumer is, and geo-target your advertising, accordingly. Db

Last edited 1 year ago by David Biernbaum
Anil Patel
Anil Patel

Contrast in shopping preferences between different income brackets is driven by disparities in access to resources and disposable income. High-income earners have easier access to transportation and more spending power, allowing them to explore a wider range of shopping options. Conversely, low-income individuals often face limitations in both transportation and budget, leading them to prioritise convenience and affordability.

As for the trend toward off-mall locations, it is undoubtedly more convenient for shoppers. Young customers too would prefer to have shops nearby in the vicinity they live in. While malls continue to serve as social hubs for entertainment, the overall appeal may diminish as more retailers will start to embrace alternative formats that the customers are preferring. Moreover, this way retailers can cater to “click-and-mortar” shoppers with initiatives like Buy Online Pickup In Store, so that they can conveniently collect their item the same-day from a nearby store.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary

A little self-discovery around this. As I read it, it occurred to me that I really haven’t thought much about brick-and-mortar vs. digital in quite a while. What once consumed a ton of my retail headspace is now so accepted that I just assume that great retail includes a truly unified commerce approach to business- strong stores and great online experiences where customers can move between channels easily. Five years ago I was talking about the nonsense around the “retail apocalypse” and the predicted demise of the shopping. Now, the tables have turned with Gen Z; it’s just foolish to suggest that online is somehow in jeapordy.
What we’ve learned is customers want options. The decision to engage on one channel or another is personal and highly influenced by the product category. We also know that just shopping, what we used call “running errands” back in the day, for a lot of people is tedious and not particularly fun. Going to an entertainment and shopping venue on the other hand, to pick out a new outfit and go to a fun restaurant, lots of appeal.
The bottom line is that great retailers need to understand their products and their customers. They also need to provide ways for them to engage and they need to meet their customers where they want to be and where they want to shop. That’s what omnichannel was supposed to deliver and I find it a bit ironic that now that it’s here, we’re having trouble recognizing it and appreciating how far the industry has come.

Nicola Kinsella
Nicola Kinsella

What does GenZ have more of compared with Millennials and GenX? Time. It’s not surprising that they have a greater preference for in-store and mall experiences that offer social benefits as well. It will be interesting to see if this pattern remains as they get older, have families, and take on other responsibilities. Regardless of GenZ trends, a key factor for malls to survive will be offering other experiences that engage and provide for social interactions. And if GenZ remain mall visitors as they age, it will not just be experiences for the young, but also whole family experiences.

Jeff Sward

I think the conclusion of this is more subtle that just saying there are stark differences in opinions on shopping preferences. 72.4% say there is more variety on-line. Well of course there is more variety on line. I’m surprised that number isn’t bigger. 77.1% say that physical stores have better quality products. Is it that they have it, or the customer can actually see and feel and confirm the quality in real life…??? And these aren’t necessarily different people. The same person can say yes, there is more variety on-line, and yes, I then like to confirm quality in person. It’s the combination, the fusing, of the channels into one overall shopping/buying experience. Discovery is a process. And confirmation is a process. You can accomplish more discovery in an hour on-line than you can in a full day at the mall. And you can accomplish more confirmation in 5 minutes at the mall than you could in a lifetime on line. It’s not about “or”. It’s about “and”. It’s about how brands and retailers remove friction and fuse the channels.

Richard J. George, Ph.D.

Not surprisingly, this research indicates that most consumers prefer the option of shopping online or instore. The Gen Z findings may be surprising, but underscore the need for retailers to develop specific marketing strategies to attract these shoppers.

Pamela Kaplan
Pamela Kaplan

There is a lot of talk lately in the industry regarding “Retail is Dead” or “The mall is dead”. Why is everyone trying to kill the physical store? Can’t we all agree that it works when executed well. I find it refreshing to read positive news about Gen Z and physical shopping – hoorah

Scott Norris
Scott Norris
Reply to  Pamela Kaplan

With all these merchants saying they need to develop off-mall, it’s not as though they will open a store in the middle of a retail desert – stores need other stores, restaurants, and services nearby to justify a trip by car or transit and reduce the burden of running errands. So – it’s a main street / high street environment integrated with housing, schools, and community facilities that gives the best ROI, as they’re coming to realize. “We destroyed a lot of inner-city infrastructure, exacerbated poverty and racial disparities, and made climate change a lot worse in the rush to pave over exurban fields & build subdivisions, but for a generation we made a handful of property developers very, very rich.”

Patricia Vekich Waldron

It’s always interesting to get new data points. These confirm my POV that consumers shop different channels by situation – fulfilling ‘needs’ often come from online and ‘wants or aspirations’ are best experienced in person.

Shep Hyken

This is classic research that needs to come to life. There are often large differences between ages, income, gender, geography, ethnicity, etc. If you’re a retailer that doesn’t take the time to understand the demographics of your customers, you’re missing a bit opportunity – and making a mistake.

John Hennessy

The one thing this study tells me is that retailers who use the power of their purchase data will outperform those who address their audience using macro trends like this study.
Yes, there are differences among groups. But there are even more differences within groups.
Retailer data gives retailers and their suppliers the ability to target not on some group affiliation or assignment but on actual purchase behavior. That level customer targeting continues to be underutilized.

More Discussions