Retail tech
frantic00/Depositphotos.com

November 14, 2025

Will an In-Store Retail Tech ‘Confidence Gap’ Create Winners and Losers?

According to research conducted by Retail Systems Research (RSR) on behalf of Jumpmind — titled “How Retailers Can Modernize In-Store Tech with Confidence” — there is an observable and significant disconnect between contemporary consumer expectations around in-store retail tech and the ability of many retailers to meet these asks.

“The physical store remains central to retail’s future. Despite the growth of digital commerce, many retailers still point to the store as their primary growth strategy. Yet paradoxically, many admit their in-store technology lags in delivering what today’s customers expect,” the report authors wrote.

“Shoppers now walk into stores already armed with product research, price comparisons, and personalized digital experiences. When they encounter outdated systems or disconnected in-store tools, the result is friction and disappointment. Retailers know this — but many still hesitate to modernize. The issue is not awareness of the opportunity, but a lack of confidence in how and where to invest,” they added.

Other notable findings related to the “confidence crisis” facing in-store retailers when it comes to adoption and integration of new tech:

  • More than one-third (34%) of retail decision-makers surveyed said their organizations were unable to keep up with consumer adoption of new technologies.
  • Slightly fewer respondents (31%) suggested that their existing systems weren’t up to snuff when it comes to meeting expectations set out by today’s customers and employees.
  • The same percentage (31%) stated that they saw in-store retail tech investment as prohibitively expensive.

Many Retailers Hesitate To Adopt In-Store Retail Tech: Barriers and Legacy Lag

Breaking down the most common barriers keeping retailers from making serious investments in tech at their physical footprints, a majority of those polled indicated that technology was shifting too frequently to keep up with (54%), nearly half (49%) exhibited concerns over difficulty in quantifying ROI, while 38% pointed to the high overall cost of ownership tied to these investments, and a slightly smaller cohort (37%) had mixed feelings over whether new tech installations would serve as tools or distractions.

Further, a significant proportion of respondents (30%) admitted that “our infrastructure prevents progress,” with antiquated or obsolete technological infrastructure meaning that adoption of the latest tech solutions was impossible without an entire restructuring.

“Our research shows 27% of retailers have Point of Sale systems that are 5 years or older. In contrast, most consumers renew cell phones every two to three years and 12% renew them every year. It’s no wonder that over half of retailers surveyed feel trying to keep up with consumer adoption of technology seems like an impossible task,” said Steve Rowen, managing partner at RSR.

Winners in Retail Adopting In-Store Tech in Greater Frequency, Survey Suggests

In the press release detailing the release of the RSR-Jumpmind research, a delineation between surveyed retailers categorized as winners — who “showed greater ambition and momentum” in their retail tech modernization efforts — and “average” and “under performers” was posited.

Among these related survey outcomes:

  • A striking majority (73%) of “retail winners” stated plans to deploy a single app to manage employee access to all required functionalities, versus 59% for average performers and under performers.
  • Two-thirds (66%) of winners had plans to implement in-store, real-time, cross-channel customer and order information. A significantly lower cohort (51%) of average performers and under performers shared these plans.
  • The same percentage of winners (66%) stated plans to have mobile devices serve as POS unit options, set against 58% of average performers and lower performers who said the same.
  • About 63% of winners outlined intentions to install in-store fulfillment solutions involving tech. Approximately 55% of average performers and under performers answered similarly.

“Retailers must gain the confidence needed to move from hesitation to innovation in their in-store technology deployments,” said Lauren Cevallos, head of strategy and customer success at Jumpmind.

“Ultimately, confidence itself becomes a competitive strategy. Those who have it will transform their stores into hubs of digital-physical engagement; those who don’t risk being left behind,” Cevallos added.


Discussion Questions

Are retailer concerns over tech obsolescence and a difficulty in measuring ROI from in-store tech spend justified? If so, what can be done to address these worries?

Does a significant investment in retail tech correlate with a business having more likelihood of retail success, or are the survey results overstated, in your opinion?

Poll

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders

Success in retail, first and foremost, lies in the traditional product, price, place, and promotion axis. Get those essential elements wrong, and it doesn’t matter how fancy or good the technology is – either in store or online. As for technology in store, yes, it can be useful and helpful, especially where it makes life easier for the customer or facilitates better operations, but it is not the primary driver of success. Anyone saying that is forgetting why most shoppers come into stores. 

Last edited 40 minutes ago by Neil Saunders
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
Noble Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

Anyone saying that is forgetting why most shoppers come into stores. 

…or likely sells tech themselves

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
Famed Member

Quite. If you’re a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Or something like that…

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

I think it’s fair to say the concerns are understandable; it’s a lot harder to say if they’re justified…at least in the purely NPV calculation sense since these are complex and necessarily involve a lot of unknowns. I don’t really have a simple answer for a broad question like this (and the “research” is often sponsored by vendors whose self-interest is abundantly clear). Anecdotally I’m sure all of us can recall failing vendors making do with mechanical cash registers in the computer age, but they usually had other issues as well (translation: the lack of tech was many times a result, rather than a cause) And how do we figure in our evaluation retailers who place too much emphasis on tech? The many who think it’s a replacement for …well, every other aspect of what makes a successful company.

Cathy Hotka
Cathy Hotka

If there’s one thing we know for sure, it’s that retailers who fail to invest in technology adequately will fall further behind. It has been proven over decades. There are headwinds, yes, but now is not the time to hold back.

Mark Ryski

The concerns about technology have been challenging retailers for decades. What’s different today is the wide array of solutions, solution providers and promises. Investment in retail tech does not define the likelihood of success, it’s the effective execution/implementation of the tech that is the difference between realized value and ROI, or not. Too often retailers assume (and may be sold by technology providers), that a solution will deliver XX% ROI, but in my experience working with retailers, many struggle with realizing the ROI in part because they don’t setup proper experiments to measure outcomes and impacts in a meaningful way. Retailers should not get hung-up on the notion that they ‘need technology.’ What they need are to effectively implement and measure impact of the critical few tools/technologies that they believe will ultimately deliver a better store experience for shoppers and enable their frontline teams to serve customers more effectively/efficiently. 

Brad Halverson
Brad Halverson

Retailers have a case that in-store tech evaluation is often murky when it comes to understanding ROI. Measurement often reveal new qualitative outputs too, making it more difficult to find answers other than “everyone loves it”. Many in-store tech options do require a significant investment in time and labor to operate each week. And so, if usage is infrequent or represents a small % of shoppers, retailers must decide if adoption has an upward trajectory, driving higher sales and profit, or in reducing cost. In other words, are customers using the in-store tech to save time, money, or improve their own experience? If unclear or no, it’s probably time to pull the plug.

BrainTrust

"Are retailer concerns over tech obsolescence and a difficulty in measuring ROI from in-store tech spend justified? If so, what can be done to address these worries?"
Avatar of Nicholas Morine

Nicholas Morine



More Discussions