
nmedia/Depositphotos.com
July 24, 2025
Is Shopper Deception Worse Online Than Offline?
A recent survey found 72% of Australian consumers encountering “a potentially unfair practice” from an online retail marketplace in the previous 12 months, such as hidden charges, accidental clicks, or accidental subscriptions.
The survey of over 3,000 Australians aged 14 and older acted as part of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) five-year investigation designed to better understand consumer’s experiences using online retail marketplaces — such as U.S. sites Amazon and eBay, China’s Shein and Temu, and Australia’s Kogan.
The research broke the potential infractions into five offense areas:
- Marketing e-mails: 42% received marketing-mails after their purchase or visit reminding them about things they didn’t purchase/left in their shopping cart; 23% received marketing emails they never knowingly signed up for, or felt ‘tricked’ into receiving.
- Forced sign-up: 16% were required to sign up for marketing communications in order to complete a purchase; 8% were required to sign up for a paid subscription in order to complete a purchase.
- Repeated reminders: 19% received repeated reminders to purchase addition service at checkout (such as a paid subscription or insurance); 18% received related reminders for sign up for additional marketing e-mails at checkout.
- Accidental subscriptions: 10% accidentally signed up for a paid subscription due to the way the option was worded.
- Accidental clicks: 20% clicked on a product or service in search results that they didn’t realize was an advertisement.
- Hidden charges: 21% discovered fees or charges at the checkout that weren’t disclosed beforehand (including delivery fees).
The ACCC concluded that its research “reinforces the need for regulatory reform to address digital platform-related competition and consumer harms, and an economy-wide prohibition on unfair trading practices.”
US Researchers Found Similar Evidence of ‘Dark Patterns’ in Online Retail Which May Persist Today
University of Chicago and Princeton researchers in 2019 found “dark patterns,” a term for deceptive online retail strategies, which appeared in more than 10% of e-commerce sites and were used frequently by many of the most popular online merchants.
The “familiar tricks” cited included:
- Countdown timers for “limited-time” sales that reset every time the user reloaded the page.
- Faked customer testimonials.
- Low-stock or high-demand notifications that appear on a recurring schedule.
- Messages or layouts that pressure consumers to buy higher-cost items.
- “Confirmshaming,” or when a pop-up uses manipulative language such as “No thanks, I don’t want to take advantage of this incredible offer” to lead users away from declining a purchase.
- Social proof, marked by messages such as “97 other users are viewing this item.”
The researchers wrote, “Many of these manipulative retail strategies have existed since long before the internet—think of the store with the never-ending ‘Going Out of Business’ sale, or the Columbia House ‘8 Albums for a Penny’ deal.”
But online shopping has pushed these “shady practices into overdrive,” per the researchers, deploying them in “newly powerful and sneaky ways.”
Discussion Questions
Do you agree that online shopping’s marketing schemes have extended traditional retail’s “shady practices into overdrive”?
Can you cite any fairly common online marketing practices that may cross the line into being overly manipulative and possibly harmful to consumers?
Poll
BrainTrust
Paula Rosenblum
Co-founder, RSR Research
Doug Garnett
President, Protonik
Shep Hyken
Chief Amazement Officer, Shepard Presentations, LLC
Recent Discussions








Nudging people into buying and trying to persuade them to buy is not deception. It’s marketing. Ultimately, people have agency, and they are not forced into buying if they do not wish to do so. Certain tactics, that deliberately mislead customers, are fraudulent and are covered under existing laws.
Is shopper deception worse online than offline? You can’t do the things listed in this article in a store.
No kidding! (Nothing more annoying than a good question being asked but being given little to answer it with, is there ?)
I am making a good salary from home $1400-$2400/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
.
Here is what I do…… https://rb.gy/y4j09o
No doubt there are nefarious marketing practices, but let’s not punish all retailers for the sins of a few. If a brand/retailer is using “shady practices” to market and sell their merchandise and services, it’s only a matter of time before customers “go social” and spread the word through review sites and social channels. The consumer has a voice that’s louder than ever, and many are willing to use it.
An interesting question, but not particularly answerable with the data provided here, which seems to fixate on “deceptions” that can only happen online (clcked on an ad by mistake? yeah, that’s going to happen in store!)
How about we compare like to like such as whether prices are as advertised.
The constant barrage of emails drive me nuts. I can just tell a salesperson “I’m good” and they walk away. These are not such sleazy tactics. They’re just annoying
Retail is like TV advertising with digital stores like multi-level marketing. TV ads are play in the big game so that any deception is trackable and actionable — it takes great care to make effective TV ads. Claims made by individuals describing multi-level products, though, are impossible to detect which allows horrific exaggerations to fly beneath any radar of enforcement. While physical stores must meet the high bar, those selling online fly so far off the radar that too many “get away” with scams. (That’s a general truth — there are also many excellent high quality online sellers.) Online, then, allows shady practices to move into overdrive. While it is illegal for a car dealership “bait and switch” by offering an unrealistic deal in advertising, similar offers are everywhere online with few ways for customers to detect or report them.
Two questions:
While physical retail deals with the natural friction of time, space, and human interaction, online retail removes these while adding artificial urgency. The dark patterns aren’t bugs; they’re design features feasting on our decision-making biases. Just as social platforms have learned to hijack dopamine pathways for engagement, e-commerce has learned to hijack cognitive shortcuts for online conversions. Warning label, anyone?
Ouch! The article’s Australian poll cites 14 and older shoppers. Wow, here in the USA most 14 year-old people cannot even legally work a full time job, drive a car, or even own a credit card. Also, the culture and purchasing behaviors here in the USA is dramatically different than those in Australia, let alone trying to compare online shopping to on-ground shopping. The other poll in the article was from 2019 (when Covid 19 was first discovered), and retailing in general has changed tremendously. Today’s retail market includes more safety practices, more mobile access (yes, phones play a larger part in our online presence than they did 6 years ago), have newer components like AI that weren’t even conceived of 6 years ago. We really need credible, current polls for us to contrast in this question.