A phone app is being used for Black Friday.
©Dragos Condrea via Canva.com

November 28, 2024

J.P. Morgan Expert Describes 3 Common Ways Retailers Needlessly Frustrate Customers

In an increasingly crowded retail space being squeezed on both ends — from the top by expanding industry titans like Walmart and Amazon, and from the bottom by a bevy of hopeful and hungry startups — it becomes imperative that middle-market retailers do everything in their power to prevent themselves from being pushed out of business entirely. That seemed to be the primary theme discussed by PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster as she sat down with J.P. Morgan’s head of commercial bank merchant services (client management), Teresa Walker.

Throughout the 20-minute interview, the two execs covered a great deal of ground, exploring topics from tech tools to fraud-fighting capabilities. First and foremost for Walker, however, was an emerging reality suggesting that if middle-market retailers don’t focus on the following aspects of their businesses, they could end up losing their customers to competitors.

Promo Problems at the Checkout

There’s almost nothing as frustrating as loading up your cart — either online or physical — and having a promo code for a discount, but it’s absent from your purse (or email inbox). Or, perhaps, it simply doesn’t work. Webster called this the “promo rope-a-dope” because it entices you into the shopping process, with the end result being annoyance.

“Integrated experiences on things like this matter,” Walker explained. “When I get something like an email, and I go: ‘Oh, cool! I’d like to get 20% off!’ And so I click on the link, and then I go to check out … where’s my 20%? Ok, I’m in an app. Now I’ve got to go back, find that email, copy that code, paste it, get my 20%. And while that takes only a couple of minutes … do I really want to do that? And I find myself kind of mad at them and irritated. Why is that still happening?”

Pointing out that a great amount of resources go into capturing a first-time customer, Walker added that their initial experience has to be positive. When a frustrating promo is offered, cart abandonment, and a negative first impression, are likely to result.

Clunky Payment Processes Can Test the Patience of Even Loyal Customers

When discussing whether customer loyalty could be eroded, Webster quickly affirmed that it could.

She suggested that it was folly for merchants to assume that their loyal customers would fight their way through a friction-filled experience.

“Most of the time, even at that moment of truth, even if it’s a brand I love or a merchant I favor, a bad checkout experience loses my sale, my appetite … maybe even forever,” Webster said.

Indicating that merchants may have blinders on when it comes to smoothing out the payment experience, particularly for long-time or repeat buyers, Walker talked about her own recent issues when engaging with payment portals. She said that the clunkiness of merchant portals may be forgiven in rare instances where a certain product was absolutely necessary, but when purchasing everyday items, it was an unforgivable error.

“Where I’m not patient is for what I call everyday shopping … I want to get in, get out of there, and get on with my day. And if I sense any kind of friction, I’m not going to shop there. And I don’t think I’m unique,” Walker said.

Failure To Link Online Purchase Profiles to In-Store

Webster and Walker went on to discuss the fact that a lack of a comprehensive customer profile, one shared reciprocally between an online storefront and its brick-and-mortar locations, can lead to deep frustration for potential customers. A failure to communicate with a customer at all potential retail touchpoints (the now-popular omnichannel customer service approach) represents a failure to keep pace with an informed, modern consumer who straddles the realms of in-person and online shopping, as MarketSource pointed out.

Walker named this as her biggest pet peeve and therefore biggest priority, because handling it effectively creates an ease-of-use case both for the retailer and the customer, eliminating time wasted by trying to dig through purchase histories or identify a certain product that a customer could be looking for.

Ultimately, Walker emphasized that “time is precious,” and customers naturally gravitate toward the path of least resistance. This puts retailers at risk of losing business to competitors offering smoother experiences unless mid-market companies address the friction points in their checkout systems, redemption processes, and omnichannel operations. Many of these retailers, she explained, have grown so rapidly that they’ve overlooked the shopper’s perspective, resulting in experiences that fuel these three major consumer frustrations.

Discussion Questions

What are the most needlessly frustrating experiences customers can run into, either online or in-store?

Which retailers stand out as offering exemplary customer service standards, making the in-store or online shopping experience easy and enjoyable?

Poll

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders

The factors identified are, indeed, points of friction. I put all of them under retail 101: they’re basics that retailers should be nailing, but so many are not. Why? A variety of reasons: systems that don’t talk to each other, disjointed thinking within the retailer, cutting resource to the bone to reduce costs, not looking at things from the customer’s point of view, poor planning, and so on. The problem is that consumers have an abundance of choice these days so will abandon retailers that constantly fail to meet their needs. 

Adam Dumey
Adam Dumey
Active Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

For once, I actually disagree. Forgive me Neil.
I believe the frustrations highlighted in this article more accurately reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of modern digital architecture rather than inherent retail challenges. Creating sub-optimal omnichannel experiences are execution failures, not industry limitations. True omnichannel integration isn’t limited to connecting disparate data sources and fragmented IT systems. The fact that basic integration issues like promo code friction and disconnected customer profiles (both a symptom of silos vs. platform thinking still persist in 2024 ruffles my feathers. That said, and to your point, consumers have more options and lower switching costs than ever before. Their purchase behavior will compel retailers to improve.
Forgive me Neil.

David Biernbaum

Shopper annoyances are plenty in-store and on-line. Online frustrations include delivery and return costs, fees, bad search engines, slow web sites, tedious methods of opening an account, site won’t properly process a credit card, inadequate customer support, lack of inventory management and visibility, lack of product information, and maybe worst of all, receiving the wrong items, wrong sku, broken, malfunctioning, ripped boxes or bags, and might personal pet peeve – delivered to wrong address.  

In-store aggravations are like on-line, yet a bit different. Long lines, lack of employees to help out, out of stocks, merchandise under lock and key, difficult inconveniences to return or exchange, poor mix of available sizes, colors, and brands, long waits to pay, also customer support. Car pick ups are convenient but only when operated properly. Otherwise, it can be a point of frustration.

In both cases, online, and more-son instore, shoppers hate when they discover an item on sale the day after they purchased at full price. Has that happened to you?

Last edited 11 months ago by David Biernbaum
Paula Rosenblum

They needed a study for this? Go shopping! And retailers have known this for at least a decade. We have studied it plenty at RSR. From the retailers’ Point of View, inventory visibility across channels has always popped up as a big one.

But, sadly, most of the companies I think about with the best customers service aren’t showing demonstrably better results. We can, however, see the impact of the ones with unfortunate customer service.

On the flip side, there are retailers where the customer doesn’t expect certain service levels. It’s all about price. Still, as Neil said, these are retail 101 basics. Putting on a geek hat for a moment, if you’re still running a pile of 25 year old systems, extending them to accomplish what the customer wants today, is easier said than done. That’s what digital transformation is about, at the end of the day. Modernize, create hooks and extensions where possible, and then move forward. Walmart took the step of doing this. The company said “We’re not going to bring earnings for a while….we’re modernizing.” They beat their self-imposed timeline but…timing is everything in this world. Was anyone better ready for the pandemic? Suddenly the company became more interesting.

Michael Zakkour
Michael Zakkour

This is the key pain point, and the solution is not OMNICHANNEL—it is taking Omnichannel and making it “Unifed Commerce.” I’ll use this as the best argument I have for why the time to create a UC strategy is vital for every retail and brand.
“Failure To Link Online Purchase Profiles to In-StoreWebster and Walker went on to discuss the fact that a lack of a comprehensive customer profile, one shared reciprocally between an online storefront and its brick-and-mortar locations, can lead to deep frustration for potential customers. A failure to communicate with a customer at all potential retail touchpoints (the now-popular omnichannel customer service approach) represents a failure to keep pace with an informed, modern consumer who straddles the realms of in-person and online shopping, as MarketSource pointed out”

Mark Ryski

Many retailers still struggle with connecting their online sites to their physical stores, and while this integration seems to be getting better for some retailers, it’s not the case for many others. What I find more problematic is what can feel like a lack of service for the shoppers who are in the physical stores. For some retailers, it seems that they are more concerned with serving the online shoppers who then come to the store to retrieve or return their products, while the shoppers who made the effort to visit the store to shop, get the short end of the service stick. As noted in the article, even one bad experience can result in a permanent loss of the customer since there are so many other alternatives for virtually anything. Knowing how many visits the store gets, and then adequately resourcing and aligning staff to support the traffic volume can go a long way to improving the probability that a customer has a good experience.

Perry Kramer
Perry Kramer

All of the points listed above; challenging coupon / rewards process, clunky checkout processes, and a disjointed view of the customers profile are all reasons consumers will abandon their loyalty to a brand. I would add that having an accurate real time view, and access to, inventory anywhere in the enterprise including on the website and to the consumer and store associate, when in the store is another friction point that will erode brand loyalty when not well executed. Additionally, recent survey data has also indicated that bombarding a Consumer with daily e-mails can have the effect of driving a consumer to a brand that is sending relevant and timely e-mail promotions.

BrainTrust

"Online frustrations include delivery and return costs, fees, bad search engines, slow web sites, tedious methods of opening an account..."
Avatar of David Biernbaum

David Biernbaum

Founder & President, David Biernbaum & Associates LLC


"The problem is that consumers have an abundance of choice these days so will abandon retailers that constantly fail to meet their needs. "
Avatar of Neil Saunders

Neil Saunders

Managing Director, GlobalData


"What I find more problematic is what can feel like a lack of service for the shoppers who are in the physical stores."
Avatar of Mark Ryski

Mark Ryski

Founder, CEO & Author, HeadCount Corporation


More Discussions