Old Navy

May 29, 2026

dennizn/Depositphotos.com

Is Old Navy in Trouble as Gap Shares Fall ~17%, or Is This a Hiccup?

Old Navy has a longstanding reputation as a fashionable and affordable apparel line under Gap, but the most recent report may have scared investors — shares were down a significant 17% as of 11:30 a.m. on May 29. And while the actual quarterly results were mixed, per CNBC’s Gabrielle Fonrouge — with Gap delivering EPS of 38 cents adjusted versus 37 cents expected, and $3.5 billion in revenue against $3.52 billion anticipated — the company did pare down its sales growth outlook to a range of 1%-2% rather than the 2%-3% established prior.

In remarks shared with CNBC, CEO Richard Dickson actually drew attention to Old Navy’s own spring and summer assortment failing to resonate with consumers, shouldering some blame at the company level rather than blaming the economy.

“It’s not a consumer issue. We’re winning with all income cohorts across low, middle, and high. When you have the right product at the right price value equation, customers are there, and our seasonal categories just got off to a weaker start,” Dickson said, with dresses and swim shorts being the weakest links.

As sales look a bit iffy in the near future, profitability appears relatively healthy: On this front, Gap raised its overall guidance to between $2.30-$2.40, an improvement over the previous range of $2.20-$2.35. An expected $80 million windfall from reduced tariff rates was not factored into any company guidance.

With Old Navy’s recent performance being sluggish — and the slow movement pressing on into the current quarter — Dickson noted that Gap was taking a “moderated view” of the year. Fonrouge noted that Old Navy accounts for more than half of Gap’s total revenue (60%, in fact), and that “any pressure on Old Navy impacts the entire company.”

Other banner results were outlined by Quartz’s Colleen Cabili: “Gap’s four brands had mixed results. The Gap brand had its best comparable sales in over 20 years, rising 10% and beating analyst expectations. Banana Republic saw positive comparable sales for the fourth quarter in a row, but its 2% gain was below the 4% analysts expected. Athleta’s turnaround has not yet worked, with overall sales down 12% and comparable sales falling 11%.”

Reddit Opinion on Old Navy Shows Mixed Results, With Many Nostalgically Pining for the Brand of Yesteryear (or Recommending Competitors)

A consultation of recent and popular Reddit threads on the subject of Old Navy’s assortment and brand rep draws mixed results.

The most recent discussion on r/frugal — titled “OId Navy quality gone downhill or [is it] just me?” — saw several users lament a perceived drop in quality across Old Navy’s inventory, with many users chiming in to give props to the brand for its 1990s and 2000s products (still going strong). Conversely, some Redditors stayed firmly loyal to today’s Old Navy stores, and still others advocated for shoppers to switch to competitors like H&M and Uniqlo.

“I have definitely noticed a decline. I have some sweaters and some jeans that I bought years ago that are holding up well. And then stuff I’ve bought within the past year or two that is already worn out and borderline unwearable,” one top-rated comment read.

On the flip side of the coin, r/unpopularopinion (note the subreddit name) featured a thread titled “Old Navy is hands down the best clothing store.” There, most users tended to agree with the original poster, who wrote:

“They’re cheap, reliable, and they always have the basics. In fact, you could argue they excel at the basics, while still occasionally offering something flashy. The lighting there is perfectly inoffensive and shows the clothing perfectly, the quality is decent, and they frequently have sales on already cheaper than average prices.”

Some criticism was still present, however, as is common to any public forum. Showing signs of reddit’s persistent anxieties around bot or corporate-insert users, one critic wrote: “Is this some sort of marketing for Old Navy? Not as cheap as Walmart. The lighting is the same in all stores.”

BrainTrust

"Does this quarter’s sniffle turn into a more serious ailment? In the near term some of the pressures will persist as the quality of the assortment is patchier."
Avatar of Neil Saunders

Neil Saunders

Managing Director, GlobalData


"A tighter consumer might actually tilt toward Old Navy… but only if the product earns the trip. That’s what they missed this spring."
Avatar of Gary Sankary

Gary Sankary

Retail Industry Strategy, Esri


"Old Navy’s market position means customers will naturally be finicky given affordable price points, with shoppers also bouncing back and forth from Shein, Uniqlo and Walmart."
Avatar of Brad Halverson

Brad Halverson

Principal, Clearbrand CX


Discussion Questions

Are investors reacting too swiftly to the recent financials tied to Gap and Old Navy in particular, in your opinion? What reasons are there for concern?

What are the key elements necessary for leadership to establish in order to improve the Old Navy brand’s public image? Is a total makeover called for?

What would you do, in a hypothetical leadership role, to steady the ship?

Poll

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Neil Saunders

Given Old Navy accounts for around 57% of group revenue, when it sneezes Gap Inc catches a cold. This quarter, the brand produced a modest 0.8% sales lift. That’s not disastrous, but it’s underweight and represents a loss of apparel market share. Does this quarter’s sniffle turn into a more serious ailment? In the near term some of the pressures will persist as the quality of the assortment is patchier. Longer term, Old Navy should be able to course correct. It remains a staple for most family shoppers, and even during the current quarter, our data show that while it has lost share of spending, it has not seen a serious erosion of customers.

Last edited 5 days ago by Neil Saunders
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

Perhaps they’re not reacting to a single point, but simply reverting to the mean: whatever timeline one looks at ( 1 year, 5, 10, 25…) GAP stock has along track record of not going anywhere https://www.google.com/finance/beta/quote/GAP:NYSE?window=MAX

Brad Halverson
Brad Halverson

Old Navy’s market position means customers will naturally be finicky given affordable price points, with shoppers also bouncing back and forth from Shein, Uniqlo and Walmart. Yet even at friendly price points, they can still build customer loyalty by ensuring product quality is more consistent, and the in-store experience matches the brand promise. Looking forward, increased differentiation should spur upside growth from improvements and new offerings in beauty and accessories, occasion wear, and plus sizing.

Mohamed Amer, PhD

The 17% drop overreacts to one quarter, but Dickson’s product-problem framing is more damning than it sounds. All four brands run on the same Gap Inc sourcing platform. On that shared system this quarter, the Gap brand comped up 10% and beat estimates by more than double, while Old Navy managed 1% and missed—same infrastructure, opposite execution. Old Navy’s stumble with dresses and seasonal products was a brand-level merchandising decision, and the platform’s long lead times only dictate how long the correction will take. Management itself guides the recovery to the back half. With Old Navy at 57% of revenue, those merchandising reads carry the whole company. The platform (as a strategic resource) is shared, but the buy judgment was not.

Georganne Bender
Georganne Bender

Can we talk about shopping across Gap Inc.’s portfolio of stores?

Over the past few years, Gap has opened some genuinely cool new locations with attractive layouts, thoughtful merchandising, and just the right touch of nostalgia. (As a former Gapper, I appreciate the nostalgia part.) The problem is that these new stores are in major cities, while countless branch stores in regional malls are overdue for a refresh.

Banana Republic, meanwhile, seems to be struggling with its identity. Is it an apparel retailer or a showroom for RH-inspired furniture and home décor? I used to be a loyal BR customer, but lately much of the women’s assortment seems tailored to the impossibly tall and skinny models featured in the ads. Aspirational branding has its place, but at some point BR has to remember who is actually buying the clothes.

Old Navy remains a reliable staple, the go-to destination for kids’ clothes, jeans, and affordable fashion. Recently, though, I’ve noticed Old Navy pushing evening gowns and other fashion pieces you wouldn’t expect to find at ON on its social media. Experimentation is fine, but when longtime customers start raising concerns about quality and selection, it’s a good idea to listen to them.

Last edited 4 days ago by Georganne Bender
Anil Patel
Anil Patel

Old Navy’s recent performance highlights how closely brand perception and financial results are connected. When customer reviews consistently point to concerns around product quality, fit, or assortment, it can gradually impact loyalty, repeat purchases, and overall brand strength.
The opportunity for Old Navy may be in using those customer signals more proactively. Listening closely to feedback and aligning product and inventory decisions with what customers value most could help strengthen both brand perception and long-term performance.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary

The Gap has been living in the world of wild stock fluctuations for a while. Investors are very sensitive to the GAP and Old Navy’s interpretation of fashion trends as reflected in sales. A bad quarter and they get punished. Sadly a good quarter and it more of a “meeting expectations” reaction. I’ll leave that alone. 
A 17% drop feels like an over-correction to be fair, but at the same time it does bring me back to fundamentals question I have had about the Gap for years: can a value-priced fashion brand stay relevant over time and across generations? Look around for a Forever 21 while you think about that. The Gap has navigated this space far better than most. Fashion risk plus macro pressure is a tough double whammy. A tighter consumer might actually tilt toward Old Navy… but only if the product earns the trip. That’s what they missed this spring.

Jeff Sward

The real problem is that the design and merchandising thinking that led to the current lackluster performance is the same design and merchandising thinking that has populated the Old Navy pipeline for the next 6-9 months. Have they already changed course, or is this their learning moment? They are reporting it now, so they have been in learning mode for the past several months. Did they learn in time to course correct for the holiday 2026 season, or will it be Spring 2027 before we see relief? The Time/Action calendar for implementing a fix in the apparel business is burdomsome for most mall retailers.

Allison McCabe

TEsting link

Last edited 1 day ago by Allison McCabe
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Neil Saunders

Given Old Navy accounts for around 57% of group revenue, when it sneezes Gap Inc catches a cold. This quarter, the brand produced a modest 0.8% sales lift. That’s not disastrous, but it’s underweight and represents a loss of apparel market share. Does this quarter’s sniffle turn into a more serious ailment? In the near term some of the pressures will persist as the quality of the assortment is patchier. Longer term, Old Navy should be able to course correct. It remains a staple for most family shoppers, and even during the current quarter, our data show that while it has lost share of spending, it has not seen a serious erosion of customers.

Last edited 5 days ago by Neil Saunders
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

Perhaps they’re not reacting to a single point, but simply reverting to the mean: whatever timeline one looks at ( 1 year, 5, 10, 25…) GAP stock has along track record of not going anywhere https://www.google.com/finance/beta/quote/GAP:NYSE?window=MAX

Brad Halverson
Brad Halverson

Old Navy’s market position means customers will naturally be finicky given affordable price points, with shoppers also bouncing back and forth from Shein, Uniqlo and Walmart. Yet even at friendly price points, they can still build customer loyalty by ensuring product quality is more consistent, and the in-store experience matches the brand promise. Looking forward, increased differentiation should spur upside growth from improvements and new offerings in beauty and accessories, occasion wear, and plus sizing.

Mohamed Amer, PhD

The 17% drop overreacts to one quarter, but Dickson’s product-problem framing is more damning than it sounds. All four brands run on the same Gap Inc sourcing platform. On that shared system this quarter, the Gap brand comped up 10% and beat estimates by more than double, while Old Navy managed 1% and missed—same infrastructure, opposite execution. Old Navy’s stumble with dresses and seasonal products was a brand-level merchandising decision, and the platform’s long lead times only dictate how long the correction will take. Management itself guides the recovery to the back half. With Old Navy at 57% of revenue, those merchandising reads carry the whole company. The platform (as a strategic resource) is shared, but the buy judgment was not.

Georganne Bender
Georganne Bender

Can we talk about shopping across Gap Inc.’s portfolio of stores?

Over the past few years, Gap has opened some genuinely cool new locations with attractive layouts, thoughtful merchandising, and just the right touch of nostalgia. (As a former Gapper, I appreciate the nostalgia part.) The problem is that these new stores are in major cities, while countless branch stores in regional malls are overdue for a refresh.

Banana Republic, meanwhile, seems to be struggling with its identity. Is it an apparel retailer or a showroom for RH-inspired furniture and home décor? I used to be a loyal BR customer, but lately much of the women’s assortment seems tailored to the impossibly tall and skinny models featured in the ads. Aspirational branding has its place, but at some point BR has to remember who is actually buying the clothes.

Old Navy remains a reliable staple, the go-to destination for kids’ clothes, jeans, and affordable fashion. Recently, though, I’ve noticed Old Navy pushing evening gowns and other fashion pieces you wouldn’t expect to find at ON on its social media. Experimentation is fine, but when longtime customers start raising concerns about quality and selection, it’s a good idea to listen to them.

Last edited 4 days ago by Georganne Bender
Anil Patel
Anil Patel

Old Navy’s recent performance highlights how closely brand perception and financial results are connected. When customer reviews consistently point to concerns around product quality, fit, or assortment, it can gradually impact loyalty, repeat purchases, and overall brand strength.
The opportunity for Old Navy may be in using those customer signals more proactively. Listening closely to feedback and aligning product and inventory decisions with what customers value most could help strengthen both brand perception and long-term performance.

Gary Sankary
Gary Sankary

The Gap has been living in the world of wild stock fluctuations for a while. Investors are very sensitive to the GAP and Old Navy’s interpretation of fashion trends as reflected in sales. A bad quarter and they get punished. Sadly a good quarter and it more of a “meeting expectations” reaction. I’ll leave that alone. 
A 17% drop feels like an over-correction to be fair, but at the same time it does bring me back to fundamentals question I have had about the Gap for years: can a value-priced fashion brand stay relevant over time and across generations? Look around for a Forever 21 while you think about that. The Gap has navigated this space far better than most. Fashion risk plus macro pressure is a tough double whammy. A tighter consumer might actually tilt toward Old Navy… but only if the product earns the trip. That’s what they missed this spring.

Jeff Sward

The real problem is that the design and merchandising thinking that led to the current lackluster performance is the same design and merchandising thinking that has populated the Old Navy pipeline for the next 6-9 months. Have they already changed course, or is this their learning moment? They are reporting it now, so they have been in learning mode for the past several months. Did they learn in time to course correct for the holiday 2026 season, or will it be Spring 2027 before we see relief? The Time/Action calendar for implementing a fix in the apparel business is burdomsome for most mall retailers.

Allison McCabe

TEsting link

Last edited 1 day ago by Allison McCabe

More Discussions