Under Armour storefront at Liverpool one retail. an American company that manufactures footwear, sports and casual apparel.
iStock.com/Ray Orton

May 21, 2024

Under Armour Looks To Do More With Less

In his first quarterly earnings call since returning to the CEO role after four years, Under Armour founder Kevin Plank outlined a new Protect This House strategy, which includes streamlining product offerings, simplifying go-to-market processes, substantially reducing discounting, and making bigger statements around launches.

The strategy focuses on three areas: amplifying product demand and loyalty, optimizing and modernizing operations, and elevating consumer experiences.

Amplifying Product Demand and Loyalty

Under Armour plans to reduce its SKU count by approximately 25% over the next 18 months with a focus on “better and best offerings” to drive balance across segmentation while decreasing “good” products that often get discounted. Plank said, “We’ll make sure that if a product is important enough for us to make and release, it’s also important enough to celebrate with storytelling or plainly, we just won’t make it.”

To be more responsive, a go-to-market turnaround from idea to selling floor of six to 12 months will be pursued versus the current 18-month process.

In marketing, product descriptions and hang tags will be overhauled as part of a broader effort to highlight the product performance attributes. Plank noted that in North America, the brand “competes primarily on price” rather than innovation. He said, “We’ve done a poor job consistently communicating our product advantages to athletes. This must be fixed as it’s hard to sell something that is a best-kept secret.”

Under Armour’s global and North American marketing teams have also been consolidated to “bring a cleaner, more creative integrated approach for faster decision-making and improved oversight.” The hiring of a new chief marketing officer is underway. Plank said, “Over the past four-plus years, the company has become overly siloed and bureaucratic with competing internal agendas. We now have just one agenda.”

Optimizing and Modernizing Operations

Under Armour will seek to simplify its operating model in part by reducing the number of outside agencies and consultants it works with, the number of reports generated across the company, and unnecessary meetings. Plank said, “There are too many products, too many initiatives, too much of too much.”

A new category portfolio structure is expected to better align product, marketing, and sales organizations for developing go-to-market approaches and offer “greater visibility in the category and product performance, which is critical to developing greater agility and adaptation,” according to Plank. Further efforts to modernize its supply chain and planning processes and optimize its cost base, including layoffs, is expected to free up funds to support growth initiatives.

Elevating Consumer Experiences

Under Armour will look to support its investments in better products and storytelling “through deliberate merchandising strategies and thoughtful distribution choices, particularly here in North America,” according to Plank.

Online, the brand’s e-commerce business “has been overly dependent on promotions.” The goal is to have more than 50% fewer site-wide promotional days online this fiscal year to build a “significantly more premium platform over the next 18 months.”

At owned retail, the brand sees opportunities to elevate curation and storytelling at its full-price stores to create more of a “premium showcase” as well as to simplify merchandising at outlet stores that are “over-sorted across categories and have too many different floor sets,” said Plank.

With wholesale partners, Under Armour will look to rebuild relationships by elevating product offerings from “mostly good and distorting toward better and best level products,” as well as through joint marketing efforts. Plank stated, “We haven’t been as consistent in giving athletes or retail customers a reason to buy our brand as robustly as possible.”

For the fiscal year ending March 2025, revenues are expected to be down at a low double-digit percentage rate. Revenues in North America, its largest market, are expected to decline between 15% and 17% due to conservative ordering by wholesale partners, proactive steps to reduce discounts for the brand in the marketplace, and generally lackluster demand for the Under Armour brand.

In the Q&A session of the call, Plank expressed confidence that while the majority of Under Armour’s struggles are “pretty much self-inflicted,” they’re fixable. He said, “At the simplest level, we find ourselves for the most part, when we show up at retail, we’re trading on price with more than should be good level product. That’s just not representative of the opportunity that this brand has. And we’re not falling on a sword saying we just have to be premium.”

Discussion Questions

What do you think of Kevin Plank’s plan to bring brand heat back to Under Armour?

What are the obvious and less obvious causes of Under Armour’s long struggle to revive growth?

Poll

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders

Most of the blame for Under Armour’s poor numbers need to be placed at its own door. The whole brand is more muddled than a cat with a ball of wool. 

There is not nearly enough product innovation, especially in important categories like sneakers, which has put Under Armour on the back foot. In apparel, ranges continue to be confusing as Under Armour jumps between trying to provide technical solutions and trying to appeal to those wanting fashion fixes. The whole approach is too scattergun, and it is not clear what the brand is or wants to be. All of this is exacerbated by an overreliance on distribution through third parties who do not treat the brand well. 

The central idea of creating a more premium positioning for the brand with better storytelling and improved product innovation and quality is right. However, this is much easier said than done. Under Armour has been through so many attempted reinventions so I am reserving judgment until I see improvements on the ground. 

Last edited 1 year ago by Neil Saunders
John Lietsch
John Lietsch

It’s hard to argue with someone who built a multi-billion dollar behemoth from nothing but if the goal is “the baby” (the company), then to save the baby all options must be considered including the possibility that it’s time for Kevin Plank to distance himself from the organization. 
 
“Over the past four-plus years, the company has become overly siloed and bureaucratic with competing internal agendas.” It’s not surprise that “there are too many products, too many initiatives, too much of too much.” When everyone is in charge, no one is in charge; and when everything is a priority, nothing is. Competing priorities and egos will eat at growth and profitability faster than I’ll eat a box of Girl Scout Cookies!
 
Great leadership. Great vision. Great courage to make difficult decisions and do the right things right. That’s what it will take and sometimes, “founders” aren’t the best at delivering those things, especially in these situations. However, I hope that Kevin is successful because I have my share of Under Armour gear and I really don’t want to wear Lululemon (like my nephews).

Last edited 1 year ago by John Lietsch
David Spear

The swagger and edginess that Under Armour exuded during the early years of their brand life was fantastic, but that has faded within the last couple of years. I agree with Mr. Plank’s decision to hire a new CMO, but I’d also recommend he hire a rock star chief transformation officer who can start a number of strategic streamlining initiatives with the company and its partners. These initiatives can drive significant efficiencies that can pay for many of the future marketing programs that the company is looking to implement.

David Biernbaum

The return of Kevin Plank as CEO of Under Armour reminds me of Howard Schultz returning to Starbucks for the very same reason, to right the ship.
It doesn’t seem that long ago that Under Armour posed a serious threat to Nike in the sport market. But from a business perspective, it has been a very long time since then.
Whenever similar situations arise, streamlining is always the solution. However, it rarely works out in the long term, because the root problems with brand marketing were still not improved or resolved.
Nevertheless, with Plank back in the saddle, Under Armour might get the right kind of marketing attention to make it in this new era, not as the brand it once was, but as a smaller, still popular brand. Db

Mohammad Ahsen
Mohammad Ahsen

Kevin Plank’s plan to revitalize Under Armour focuses on quality over quantity, emphasizing premium products and storytelling to create brand desirability. Streamlining operations and reducing discounts should enhance brand perception and profitability. This strategic pivot could help Under Armour regain market relevance by focusing on innovation and strong consumer experiences, vital in the competitive athletic wear market.

Under Armour’s growth struggles stem from overreliance on discounts, intense competition, and product missteps. Ineffective marketing, supply chain issues, and a siloed organizational structure compounded the problems. Additionally, slow adaptation to digital trends, underperformance in the women’s market, and frequent leadership changes hindered consistent strategy execution. Addressing these requires a clear brand identity and market adaptation.

Clay Parnell
Clay Parnell

The updated strategy and associated plans are appropriate and make sense, but UA’s challenge the last several years has been execution. In addition, UA’s early successes were before additional athletic and leisure brands came into the market, so their competitive landscape is vastly different than 10 or even 5 years ago. Plank’s commitment is admirable, but he needs a strong and experienced team with accountability to get things done, including addressing the assortment, pricing/promotions, and channel positioning (e.g., reliance on major retailers like Dick’s Sporting Goods).

Lucille DeHart

I applaud the new “owned first” mentality. No segment can protect the brand more than the flagships and vertical channels. Returning to innovation over promotion is also a strong strategy as long as they can live up to the vision. The main issue with their turn around is the vast expansion of athleisure and attenable technology across competitors. Under Armour needs a more focused approach, do less better. The SKU reduction should not hurt them as they can identify the outliers from the assortment that will not impact sales drastically. Narrow and deep will allow for more full price selling and more efficient fulfillments.

Jeff Sward

Under Armour had a simple, brilliant beginning. Followed by tremendous success, followed by brand hubris and lack of discipline. The lack of discipline was disguised as well intentioned out-of-the-box thinking. Turns out “more” has as much downside as it does upside if poorly executed.
They want to reduce sku’s by 25%. But…if idea to selling floor is currently 18 months (ridiculous…ludicrous…!!!) that’s a long time to wait for the new and improved UA. I can only hope they pick a couple of their own stores and key accounts where they will execute new and improved sooner than later. Editing down to core storytelling is easier quicker than having to add. (Or do they still not have the right core products,,,???) In the meantime it sounds like there may be a lot of product in the pipeline that will have to be dealt with in a manner not harmful to the brand. That won’t be easy.
Kevin Plank may indeed be the right guy if the agenda is to bring UA back to their roots. Who understands that better than Kevin? Great products with great storytelling. The ingredients are there. Brand promise and brand management 101.

Mark Self
Mark Self

What happens when growth stops? Why, you cut costs, streamline your operations, that is what!
The core problem is Under Armour is a Junior High School version of Nike, and they will never graduate to High School much less college.

Brandon Rael
Brandon Rael

There is a long history of brands curating their operations, optimizing their processes, rationalizing their store footprint, reducing their headcount, curating their assortments, and revitalizing the brands with better products, enhanced promotions, and customer-centric strategies. Under Armour, Kevin Plank’s leadership has a significant challenge ahead of them.
Under Armour has experienced challenges revitalizing the brand and attempting to gain market share from Nike, Adidas, Puma, and other brands in a congested and highly competitive athletic and casual footwear and apparel market. Under Armour once had a cutting-edge approach to product design and was one of the emerging leaders in the category. Unfortunately, their overdistribution and dependency on third-party retailers and outlets have diminished the brand equity.
It will be interesting to see how the transformation and turnaround plans come to fruition. However, considering Under Armour’s recent history, it will be an extreme challenge.

Last edited 1 year ago by Brandon Rael
Michael Zakkour
Michael Zakkour

The focus on better/best plus storytelling is encouraging. But, unless this approach is coupled with proper product/channel/market fit, utilization of new storytelling channels and formats, and a better integrated online/offline immersion, it won’t be enough to dig out of a hole as deep as this one.

Mark Ryski

As the founder, I respect Kevin Plank’s perspective and believe that he’s done an excellent job at defining the many problems – now the challenge is to actually fix them. There’s no doubt that the recent change in CEO has been a set-back for Under Armour, and no doubt contributed to some of the disfunction. But Under Armour’s challenges pre-date the CEO transition stuff. The general direction to get back to focusing on real product innovation and leaning to premium offerings make good sense. But beyond it’s own internal challenges, Under Armour is also facing a consumer that is financially stretched and general demand is tepid, which doesn’t help matters. 

Shannon Flanagan
Shannon Flanagan

There was no “wow” factor in this plan. It’s simply doing the fundamentals better. They are plagued with common operating model problems. The good news is that are fixable with the right leaders, rigor and commitment; but herein lies the challenge, that’s easier said than done. I echo the need for a transformation chief – there are so many interrelated issues that cannot be solved in a vacuum by functional leaders/strategies.

Nicola Kinsella
Nicola Kinsella

I want to hear more about the data strategy they will use to drive growth. The product attributes. How will they increase the attributes they track? How will they use those attributes to make it easier for customers to understand the value of their offering? How will they use those attributes to understand customer preferences at a more granular level of detail so they can provide personalized messages and recommendations? And to inform future product decisions?

BrainTrust

"As the founder, I respect Kevin Plank’s perspective and believe that he’s done an excellent job at defining the many problems – now the challenge is to actually fix them."
Avatar of Mark Ryski

Mark Ryski

Founder, CEO & Author, HeadCount Corporation


"It will be interesting to see how the transformation & turnaround plans come to fruition. However, considering Under Armour’s recent history, it will be an extreme challenge."
Avatar of Brandon Rael

Brandon Rael

Strategy & Operations Transformation Leader


"The updated strategy and associated plans are appropriate and make sense, but UA’s challenge the last several years has been execution."
Avatar of Clay Parnell

Clay Parnell

President and Managing Partner


More Discussions