May 21, 2024
iStock.com/PaulMcKinnon
Can Red Lobster Successfully Continue With New Owners?
Red Lobster has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after abruptly closing numerous locations. The company plans to streamline operations, reduce restaurant numbers, and seek a sale of most assets. The remaining locations will stay open with a $100 million financing commitment from lenders. CEO Jonathan Tibus said the restructuring will address financial challenges and strengthen the company.
According to The Washington Post, Red Lobster said in the court filing that “it has more than 100,000 creditors,” and its liabilities are estimated between $1 billion and $10 billion, worsened by COVID-19 and rising costs. The popular Endless Shrimp promotion significantly contributed to financial losses.
TAGeX Brands conducted an online auction for equipment and furnishings from Red Lobster restaurants that closed in several states, including five locations each in California and Florida and four each in Maryland and Colorado. The auction, described as the “largest restaurant equipment auction ever,” ran through Thursday, May 16. Available items included high-performance ovens, refrigerators, and dining room furniture. Each auction was winner-takes-all, meaning the highest bidder for each location received all the contents from that restaurant.
Though only around 50 Red Lobster restaurants were listed on the auction site, there have been reports that more locations could be closing down. According to USA Today, last week, Red Lobster’s website listed 87 stores in 27 states as “temporarily closed.”
In a press release shared on Sunday night, Red Lobster announced that it has “entered into a stalking horse purchase agreement” as part of the bankruptcy filing, where the business will be sold to a new entity that will be entirely owned and controlled by its current lenders.
The restructuring process is expected to provide Red Lobster with the necessary tools to overcome its financial hurdles and position itself for future growth. By transferring ownership to its lenders, Red Lobster aims to stabilize its financial situation and streamline its operations. This move is seen as a crucial step in revitalizing the brand and reinforcing its presence in the competitive restaurant industry.
“This restructuring is the best path forward for Red Lobster. It allows us to address several financial and operational challenges and emerge stronger and re-focused on our growth. The support we’ve received from our lenders and vendors will help ensure that we can complete the sale process quickly and efficiently while remaining focused on our employees and guests.”
CEO Jonathan Tibus via Red Lobster
There is speculation that a resilient future for Red Lobster is possible due to the reduced number of locations. This decrease could paradoxically heighten public demand, creating a more exclusive and sought-after dining experience.
One analyst proposed an innovative approach to bolster the brand’s finances and engage its dedicated customer base: a “Save Red Lobster” crowdfunding campaign. This initiative could tap into the loyalty and passion of Red Lobster’s fans, rallying them to contribute to the brand’s revitalization. By involving the community directly, such a campaign could not only provide a much-needed financial boost but also strengthen the emotional connection between the restaurant and its patrons.
On social media, users have taken to posting nostalgic Red Lobster commercials and advertisements for the restaurant. Some have wondered if the store closings will affect the production and availability of Red Lobster’s frozen grocery offerings. Another user linked to a promotion showcasing an “Endless Lobster Experience” that’s coming soon.
As Red Lobster navigates its restructuring, this combined strategy of streamlining operations and leveraging public support could play a crucial role in ensuring its long-term viability and success.
BrainTrust
Michael Zakkour
Founder - 5 New Digital &International Marketing Lead at UNILEVER
Mohammad Ahsen
Co-Founder, Customer Maps
Neil Saunders
Managing Director, GlobalData
Recent Discussions
Discussion Questions
In what ways do you foresee the restructuring efforts, including the closure of numerous locations and the sale of assets, impacting Red Lobster’s brand image and market positioning in the competitive restaurant industry?
What changes might the new owners of Red Lobster implement to improve the brand’s financial situation and operational efficiency following the restructuring?
How could the new owners leverage community support to enhance the brand’s revival efforts and strengthen customer loyalty?
Poll
Loading …
While the endless shrimp promotion will shoulder a lot of the blame for the demise of Red Lobster, the truth is more prosaic. This was simply a very badly run company that had made years of missteps. Constant cost cutting left too many restaurants in a sorry state. A terrible sale and lease-back agreement on many properties (executed by private equity, of course) made many locations uneconomical and damaged profit. And a fading brand, that was never invested in, put off consumers who found newer fast casual chains more appealing. Of course, the shrimp promotion was unhelpful – costing the chain $20 million – so it was another nail in an already assembled coffin. Thai Union, an investor in Red Lobster, influenced the shrimp promotion because its primary business is in seafood. It also made itself one of the main suppliers to Red Lobster with the aim of selling more shrimp. It was a seriously dumb decision and a very odd way to go about running a business!
The first step in turning all of this around is to put in place a proper, focused management team with the interests of the business at heart. The second is to exit unfavorable leases and locations to stabilize the finances. The third is to revive the brand and get customers back.
liabilities are estimated between $1 billion and $10 billion : I certainly hope that was just a box they checked on some form, and not an indicator of how vague their understanding of finance is! As always with bankruptcies, the first question is “was this a financial problem or a fundamental business issue (or a mix)?” A quick search turned up this little tidbit – Golden Gate Capital took over Orlando, Florida-based Red Lobster from Darden Restaurants Inc. through a $2.1 billion leveraged buyout in 2014 – so it’s safe to say it’s either Door 1 or Door 3; I’m leaning more toward 3: the concept seems a little dated and their ready willingness to pare store count suggests a large number of unproductive locations.. I think they have a chance, but it’s a mixed one (I’ve never met anyone who felt passionate about the brand – if they did they kept it a secret – and the thought of induced scarcity, or even community support, both seem like stretches).
That buyout is the root cause of most of today’s problems. It caused Red Lobster a serious amount of financial pain. And the sale and leaseback of restaurants – which was used partly to fund the acquisition – has plagued the chain. Of course, some investors are still advocating this type of arrangement for Kohl’s, Macy’s, etc.
or “investors”…this is still a family-friendly blog, we needn’t go further 🙂
Golden Gate doesn’t have the best track record for actually turning a company around. Have I mentioned how much I dislike LBOs?
No, but mention it as much as you like – because I am in agreement with you!!
With a sharply reduced number of stores, Red Lobster will obviously have marketing and supply chain challenges. That said, it would be easy enough to create a viral social media campaign asking customers to relate their best “I Love Red Lobster” story that the late night talk shows might pick up.
“There is speculation that a resilient future for Red Lobster is possible due to the reduced number of locations. This decrease could paradoxically heighten public demand, creating a more exclusive and sought-after dining experience.” Nope, I don’t think so. I haven’t even thought about going to a Red Lobster for years. I think Red Lobster is another chain that will end up in the graveyard of restaurants.
There’s a ton of daylight between $1 billion and $10 billion but in this case I don’t think it will make any difference. Red Lobster is toast, or a dead duck, or whatever appropriate food metaphor you want to use. As to restructuring, whom is kidding whom? The remains assets will be stripped, debts transferred, etc., etc. so the chain will stumble on until the “stalking horse” finally runs over it and tramples what’s left of its bones into the ground. Oh yeah, one more thing, it wasn’t the shrimp that killed the company.
I ate there once. The endless shrimp sounded interesting, but overall I don’t love Darden restaurants so I just didn’t. Didn’t know Darden had sold it off.
sounds like if they avoid endless shrimp, they should do fine…
I doubt that it was because Red Lobster offered all-you-can-eat shrimp that they reached this point.
It is my opinion, and not based on facts or research, but I believe Red Lobster has been declining steadily for several years, even before entering into stupid financial deals and lease blunders, the restaurant has been declining with quality, service, consistency, and restaurant management for years.
In spite of this, customers still flock to Red Lobster, and the brand still holds tremendous value, which is why it could survive under new ownership. – Db
Red Lobster’s downfall stemmed from poor management, cost-cutting, and bad lease agreements, compounded by an ill-advised shrimp promotion. To turn around, they need a dedicated management team, exit bad leases, and revitalize the brand to attract customers.
The restructuring efforts, including closing numerous locations and selling assets, could strengthen Red Lobster’s brand image by making it more exclusive, improving operations and customer experience, positioning Red Lobster as a more premium and resilient dining option in a competitive market. and financially stable. However, it might also reduce its market presence and accessibility.
The new owners can enhance marketing to attract more customers, renegotiate leases to reduce costs, and invest in technology for better efficiency. Additionally, they might introduce loyalty programs to retain customers and boost sales
For what was once a staple in the casual dining sector, Red Lobster has fallen fast. After years of mismanagement, relentless cost-cutting, and poor execution, in 2014, its parent company, Darden, sold Red Lobster to a private equity firm called Golden Gate Capital for $2.1 billion. That sale helped Darden pay off $100 million in debt and fueled significant growth for its other restaurants, like Olive Garden, in the ensuing years. Even when COVID hit in 2020, the company maintained positive cash flow as other restaurants floundered. Red Lobster, though, continued to struggle.
While on the surface, the extremely costly and unprofitable endless shrimp promotion backfired, costing the company $20B, these series of events have accelerated Red Lobster’s downfall:
- Following the sale of Red Lobster to Golden Gate, the chain’s real estate assets were also sold off, which meant that the restaurants now had to pay rent on these locations to their parent company
- As such, the company was stuck in leases for underperforming restaurants that it couldn’t afford
- As with other private equity forays into industries like retail and media, Red Lobster’s new owner saddled it with a lot of debt
- In August 2020, Golden Gate Capital sold Red Lobster to Thai Union, a Thailand-based seafood company that owns several seafood brands, including the canned tuna brand Chicken of the Sea
- Once Thai Union took over, Red Lobster insiders say that the company engaged in extreme cost-cutting measures and did not place enough emphasis on innovation, especially as fast-casual restaurants like Cava and Chipotle took over an increasingly large portion of the casual dining market
- Just four years later, in January 2024, Thai Union was ready to get out of the restaurant business, citing “sustained industry headwinds, higher interest rates, and rising material and labor costs.”
With all of this said, it will be very challenging to reignite the brand, regain what was lost, get back to executing profitably at scale, and get out of the lease arrangements to have a remote chance at a comeback,
These moves just forestall the inevitable. Stick a fork in this one, it is overcooked with no flavor.
Let’s see…as a start, a VC buys the company and sells off some of the real estate assets. Sound familiar? Does this tale ever end well? Add a pandemic and then race-to-the-bottom pricing to bring customers back. That’s quite a confluence of highly problematic variables. I’m allergic to shellfish, so I can’t say that I am a deep student of Red Lobster’s offerings over the years. Hopefully there is a solution that keeps this niche of the market alive and well.
Let this be a lesson to those wanting activist investors to secure control of Macy’s…!
Sometimes, a retailer, brand, or restaurant’s time has simply come and gone. Red Lobster emerged when eating seafood was RARE outside of coastal cities. They brought entry-level seafood to the middle of the country. That’s what drove their growth. I was on a cruise years ago, and we were seated with a mother and daughter from the Midwest. It was the 1st time they ever ate shrimp and clams.
Now, quality seafood can be had virtually anywhere in the country. Unless RL restructures and relaunches with a totally different value proposition, it can’t be saved, and there is no reason to save it.
Red Lobster has been in decline for years – it’s units and menus don’t deliver the kind of experience diners are looking today. My sympathy is for the 100k creditors and thousands of employees that are impacted by an extended period of poor decisions from the management team.
More Discussions
How Important Is ‘Vibe’ in Physical Retail?
Not attempting to be too playfully groovy about this question: According to a recent report from…Will Pinterest Translate to Shoppable TV?
Will Pinterest lead the way in shoppable TV?How Can Retailers Improve Shoppers’ Sense of Closure When Concerns Emerge?
How can retailers better provide closure and proper resolution to today’s shoppers?
While the endless shrimp promotion will shoulder a lot of the blame for the demise of Red Lobster, the truth is more prosaic. This was simply a very badly run company that had made years of missteps. Constant cost cutting left too many restaurants in a sorry state. A terrible sale and lease-back agreement on many properties (executed by private equity, of course) made many locations uneconomical and damaged profit. And a fading brand, that was never invested in, put off consumers who found newer fast casual chains more appealing. Of course, the shrimp promotion was unhelpful – costing the chain $20 million – so it was another nail in an already assembled coffin. Thai Union, an investor in Red Lobster, influenced the shrimp promotion because its primary business is in seafood. It also made itself one of the main suppliers to Red Lobster with the aim of selling more shrimp. It was a seriously dumb decision and a very odd way to go about running a business!
The first step in turning all of this around is to put in place a proper, focused management team with the interests of the business at heart. The second is to exit unfavorable leases and locations to stabilize the finances. The third is to revive the brand and get customers back.
liabilities are estimated between $1 billion and $10 billion : I certainly hope that was just a box they checked on some form, and not an indicator of how vague their understanding of finance is! As always with bankruptcies, the first question is “was this a financial problem or a fundamental business issue (or a mix)?” A quick search turned up this little tidbit – Golden Gate Capital took over Orlando, Florida-based Red Lobster from Darden Restaurants Inc. through a $2.1 billion leveraged buyout in 2014 – so it’s safe to say it’s either Door 1 or Door 3; I’m leaning more toward 3: the concept seems a little dated and their ready willingness to pare store count suggests a large number of unproductive locations.. I think they have a chance, but it’s a mixed one (I’ve never met anyone who felt passionate about the brand – if they did they kept it a secret – and the thought of induced scarcity, or even community support, both seem like stretches).
That buyout is the root cause of most of today’s problems. It caused Red Lobster a serious amount of financial pain. And the sale and leaseback of restaurants – which was used partly to fund the acquisition – has plagued the chain. Of course, some investors are still advocating this type of arrangement for Kohl’s, Macy’s, etc.
or “investors”…this is still a family-friendly blog, we needn’t go further 🙂
Golden Gate doesn’t have the best track record for actually turning a company around. Have I mentioned how much I dislike LBOs?
No, but mention it as much as you like – because I am in agreement with you!!
With a sharply reduced number of stores, Red Lobster will obviously have marketing and supply chain challenges. That said, it would be easy enough to create a viral social media campaign asking customers to relate their best “I Love Red Lobster” story that the late night talk shows might pick up.
“There is speculation that a resilient future for Red Lobster is possible due to the reduced number of locations. This decrease could paradoxically heighten public demand, creating a more exclusive and sought-after dining experience.” Nope, I don’t think so. I haven’t even thought about going to a Red Lobster for years. I think Red Lobster is another chain that will end up in the graveyard of restaurants.
There’s a ton of daylight between $1 billion and $10 billion but in this case I don’t think it will make any difference. Red Lobster is toast, or a dead duck, or whatever appropriate food metaphor you want to use. As to restructuring, whom is kidding whom? The remains assets will be stripped, debts transferred, etc., etc. so the chain will stumble on until the “stalking horse” finally runs over it and tramples what’s left of its bones into the ground. Oh yeah, one more thing, it wasn’t the shrimp that killed the company.
I ate there once. The endless shrimp sounded interesting, but overall I don’t love Darden restaurants so I just didn’t. Didn’t know Darden had sold it off.
sounds like if they avoid endless shrimp, they should do fine…
I doubt that it was because Red Lobster offered all-you-can-eat shrimp that they reached this point.
It is my opinion, and not based on facts or research, but I believe Red Lobster has been declining steadily for several years, even before entering into stupid financial deals and lease blunders, the restaurant has been declining with quality, service, consistency, and restaurant management for years.
In spite of this, customers still flock to Red Lobster, and the brand still holds tremendous value, which is why it could survive under new ownership. – Db
Red Lobster’s downfall stemmed from poor management, cost-cutting, and bad lease agreements, compounded by an ill-advised shrimp promotion. To turn around, they need a dedicated management team, exit bad leases, and revitalize the brand to attract customers.
The restructuring efforts, including closing numerous locations and selling assets, could strengthen Red Lobster’s brand image by making it more exclusive, improving operations and customer experience, positioning Red Lobster as a more premium and resilient dining option in a competitive market. and financially stable. However, it might also reduce its market presence and accessibility.
The new owners can enhance marketing to attract more customers, renegotiate leases to reduce costs, and invest in technology for better efficiency. Additionally, they might introduce loyalty programs to retain customers and boost sales
For what was once a staple in the casual dining sector, Red Lobster has fallen fast. After years of mismanagement, relentless cost-cutting, and poor execution, in 2014, its parent company, Darden, sold Red Lobster to a private equity firm called Golden Gate Capital for $2.1 billion. That sale helped Darden pay off $100 million in debt and fueled significant growth for its other restaurants, like Olive Garden, in the ensuing years. Even when COVID hit in 2020, the company maintained positive cash flow as other restaurants floundered. Red Lobster, though, continued to struggle.
While on the surface, the extremely costly and unprofitable endless shrimp promotion backfired, costing the company $20B, these series of events have accelerated Red Lobster’s downfall:
With all of this said, it will be very challenging to reignite the brand, regain what was lost, get back to executing profitably at scale, and get out of the lease arrangements to have a remote chance at a comeback,
These moves just forestall the inevitable. Stick a fork in this one, it is overcooked with no flavor.
Let’s see…as a start, a VC buys the company and sells off some of the real estate assets. Sound familiar? Does this tale ever end well? Add a pandemic and then race-to-the-bottom pricing to bring customers back. That’s quite a confluence of highly problematic variables. I’m allergic to shellfish, so I can’t say that I am a deep student of Red Lobster’s offerings over the years. Hopefully there is a solution that keeps this niche of the market alive and well.
Let this be a lesson to those wanting activist investors to secure control of Macy’s…!
Sometimes, a retailer, brand, or restaurant’s time has simply come and gone. Red Lobster emerged when eating seafood was RARE outside of coastal cities. They brought entry-level seafood to the middle of the country. That’s what drove their growth. I was on a cruise years ago, and we were seated with a mother and daughter from the Midwest. It was the 1st time they ever ate shrimp and clams.
Now, quality seafood can be had virtually anywhere in the country. Unless RL restructures and relaunches with a totally different value proposition, it can’t be saved, and there is no reason to save it.
Red Lobster has been in decline for years – it’s units and menus don’t deliver the kind of experience diners are looking today. My sympathy is for the 100k creditors and thousands of employees that are impacted by an extended period of poor decisions from the management team.