
iStock.com/slobo
January 6, 2025
Should Costco Be Championing Its DEI Practices?
As many major U.S. companies dial back their diversity efforts under activists’ pressure, Costco is strongly defending its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) focus, claiming the programs support its in-store offerings and values.
The wholesale club now faces calls for a boycott, according to a Newsweek article.
Costco’s strong defense follows a proposal by a group of shareholders, led by conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), calling for Costco’s board to “conduct an evaluation and publish a report, omitting proprietary and privileged information, on the risks of the company maintaining its current DEI (including ‘People & Communities’) roles, policies and goals.”
The proposal described DEI programs, including in hiring and choosing suppliers, as “illegal discrimination” and claimed they expose the company to legal and reputational risks.
Costco’s board of directors explained in its proxy statement to investors that the opposite is true: “We welcome members from all walks of life and backgrounds. As our membership diversifies, we believe that serving it with a diverse group of employees enhances satisfaction. Among other things, a diverse group of employees helps bring originality and creativity to our merchandise offerings, promoting the ‘treasure hunt’ that our customers value. That group also helps to provide insights into the tastes and preferences of our members. And we believe (and member feedback shows) that many of our members like to see themselves reflected in the people in our warehouses with whom they interact.”
The board added that aiming for diversity across its supplier base, including “appropriate attention to small businesses, is beneficial for many of the same reasons diversity benefits our company. We believe that it fosters creativity and innovation in the merchandise and services that we offer our members.”
In a unanimous vote, the Board urged shareholders to reject the proposal. Shareholders will vote on it at the annual meeting on Jan. 23.
The dispute comes as Walmart, Harley Davidson, Ford Motor Company, Tractor Supply, John Deere, Home Depot, Lowe’s, Microsoft, Southwest Airlines, and several other major companies have started to scale back or scrap their DEI commitments that were put in place or amplified following the 2020 death of George Floyd and the subsequent Black Lives Matter protest campaigns.
Bud Light in early 2023 became a poster child for risks related to diversity efforts, as it faced a major boycott after featuring TikTok personality and transgender woman Dylan Mulvaney in a social media promotion. Target later that year during June’s Pride Month faced a boycott due to in-store displays of LGBTQ+ gear, including “tuck” swimsuits for trans women, leading to a scaling back of its Pride program the following year.
Conservative activists in recent years have been more aggressively pushing boards to eliminate corporate DEI programs that factor in race and gender for hiring, promotions, and supplier selections following a Supreme Court ruling in 2023 that struck down affirmative action in college admissions. Anti-DEI activists claim that the goal of equity as part of diversity pushes comes at the expense of merit. Since the ruling, several companies have faced lawsuits over DEI practices, including Starbucks, which was hit with a $25 million lawsuit for discriminating against a white employee.
Proponents of the Costco proposal warn that the retailer could be vulnerable to similar legal challenges, especially since its DEI program emphasizes “equity” and includes a chief diversity officer.
Costco’s board of directors asserted that its DEI practices “are legally appropriate, and nothing in the proposal demonstrates otherwise.” The board also claimed that the National Center for Public Policy Research’s request for a study of Costco’s DEI practices “reflects a policy bias” and threatens to burden company resources.
The calls on social media to boycott Costco haven’t yet delivered the backlash seen by Bud Light or Target.
A recent Wall Street Journal article indicated that the pressure on companies from activists over diversity programs will likely increase under a second Trump administration. The article stated, “Supporters of DEI say most boards and executives still support diversity efforts, even if they avoid the term, bend to the demands of activists or try to sidestep skirmishes with Trump’s administration. CEOs also risk backlash among customers and employees.”
Discussion Questions
Did Costco make the right move in strongly defending its DEI policies?
What should go into any retailer’s or brand’s decision to scale back, tone down, or broadcast their DEI programs?
Poll
BrainTrust
Mark Ryski
Founder, CEO & Author, HeadCount Corporation
Cathy Hotka
Principal, Cathy Hotka & Associates
Mohamed Amer, PhD
CEO & Strategic Board Advisor, Strategy Doctor
Recent Discussions








It might be nice, of course, to know what those policies actually are – I’ll be charitable and assume this case will be argued strictly on its legal merits rather than as an ideological statement – but based on what I know at present, who am I going to believe: a Board that has made Costco one of the best performing retailers in America, or an obscure “think thank”, whose retail experience is even smaller than its reputation ?
They did express them in the article. This is just a piece of what they said…”The board added that aiming for diversity across its supplier base, including “appropriate attention to small businesses, is beneficial for many of the same reasons diversity benefits our company. We believe that it fosters creativity and innovation in the merchandise and services that we offer our members.””
Exactly. Costco has always taken the high road, as often as “the Street” used to punish the company for it. The board’s logic is completely correct. I really will renew my membership there and try to give them a larger share of my wallet.
The country is basically being bullied by the last vestiges of white privilege, and then those same no-longer-privileged whine when they’re called on it. “you’re discriminating against us.” Yes, we took your names, brought you here in chains and bought and sold you like cattle. I am so over the direction this country is headed. I’m quite glad to be old and will be happy to give Costco my business,
Exactly, Paula.
The policies were expressed in general terms, which is why I based my comment on my faith in the Board, rather than the polices themselves; but the case, should it actually be litigated, will turn on specific language and how it applies to specific statutes.
Neither Costco, nor any other private sector business, needs to be DEI, and no business should require their suppliers to be DEI.
DEI is another form of discrimination. Candidates who are the most qualified for certain positions are often passed on because that candidate isn’t a person of color. How is that better than any other type of discrimination? It’s not.
DEI is another form of identity politics. People should be hired and appointed based on their personal individually, i.e., experience, ideas, and qualifications, etc., not by the race they happen to be.
A great number of people are amazing but not because of race qualifications, but instead, because of individuality. It must be insulting to believe you were hired or appointed, first, because race..
As Costco usually does – they make the right move. Costco realizes that these policies are not ‘window dressing,’ rather, they produced better business results. Every company is unique and its leadership needs to take a position that is consistent with their vision, culture, shareholders, etc. Policies can change/evolve over time and they should. Companies like Costco should not be attacked for finding the right approach for their business. Aren’t there more important problems for government think tanks to focus on? How about homelessness?
Those “think tanks” do not “think about homelessness et al.; they only support the resurrection of whiteness in this beautiful multicultural society.
The Costco Board is taking a brave stand that reflects company values and commitment to its employees and growing membership. The number of conservative think tanks and their funding is on the rise, and one of their favorite targets is corporate DEI initiatives. Whether it’s NCPPR or the litigious AFL, their attacks on DEI reframe sound business decisions into divisive and fear-mongering identity politics.
As I have previously shared, research in complex adaptive systems informs us that organizations that are more diverse internally can better face a complex external landscape. More importantly, the internal rate of change must match the external rate of change for the organization to adapt and remain relevant in its market. Homogeneity is the enemy of adaptability—biological ecosystems are living proof of the need for variety in survival.
Making sound business decisions requires the leadership to set up organization and capabilities to best understand and connect with their customers and profitably deliver on their expectations. Successful companies are those that introduce diversity internally to remain relevant. The Costco Board of Directors is spot on when it states, “As our membership diversifies, we believe that serving it with a diverse group of employees enhances satisfaction….also helps to provide insights into the tastes and preferences of our members… [and] many of our members like to see themselves reflected in the people in our warehouses with whom they interact.”
Your research has been reproduced for over a decade in multiple ways. The results are always the same. The more diverse a company is from the top to the bottom, the better performance the company produces.
Do these activists want the country to have the best companies in the world or the whitest?
Given Costco’s commercial success, I trust its board to make the right decisions and to stay on the right side of rulings and laws. I also agree that there is strength in diversity, if only because it helps Costco to understand various points of view about customers and other matters. That said, while I think there is scope to encourage diversity, I think that hiring should ultimately be made on merit and not based on quotas. Any other way is highly problematic.
A backlash at Costco? I think they’d like to believe that. It’s disturbing how companies are bowing down to far right threats. Costco is one of the best retailers in the world. Others could take a page from their to North of who they are and how they got there.
EXACTLY
Watching some of our biggest and best-run companies capitulate to a few reactionary activists has been disheartening. I find it tell that when these pressure groups bring “backlashes,” they are always about reimposing a status quo I had hoped we, as a society, had moved past. Kudos to Costco for staying the course and supporting their employees and customers and the communities they come from.
The question is this: should companies that serve the public seek to understand all their customers, or only the white male ones? DEI efforts empower companies to relate to every customer, and Costco’s ongoing efforts validate their success.
I’ll echo what most fellow panelists have said: If DEI is a core value of Costco — and has been long before it became fashionable and then a dirty word — the company is to be applauded for not kowtowing to political pressure. Conservative activists among its shareholders might enjoy the attention they are receiving these days, but they should appreciate that Costco is displaying some backbone while many of its peers are behaving like invertebrates. (I’m talking to you, Jeff Bezos.)
Costco has long strived for a mix of products which reflect what their customer base wants. That’s been the focus we see in their merchandising and in the exciting treasure hunt. If their board and leadership believes having a diverse set of employees has been a driver in helping them get there, then it’s hard to argue that success isn’t working. Assuming hiring is still driven by merit, then this controversy is really more of an inflated issue than it needs to be.
I echo everyone who has shared their support for Costco and why. It’s so disappointing to me that this is such a highly contested topic. If you don’t care about the people, then just look at the numbers.
Costco’s statement and practices strike me as completely different from what happened at Bud Light (let’s bring n Dylan M. and alienate our core customers), Target (let’s embrace transgender clothing, etc) and Harley Davidson (let’s put the CEO on stage supporting DEI while we move manufacturing to Vietnam, etc.). The later three demonstrate remarkable tone deafness toward their existing market while Costco simply states they support diversity, while continuing to provide a superior selection of goods and delivering a profit to shareholders. Nothing to see there.
Corporate America is moving away from DEI commitments because citizens are telling them to do so. Costco can do what it wants, but it risks alienating many of its shoppers.