This is good for both Target and Apple. Target continues to burnish their expansive brand offering, and Apple gets additional, significant distribution via Target stores. As technology continues to play a bigger role in our everyday lives, it makes sense that finding these products in a general merchandise stores make sense — Target is the right fit for Apple.

The Apple and Target partnership is a great deal for both Apple and Target. For Apple it expands the reach of physical stores, which is a great benefit to attract customers that prefer to purchase Apple products in person or want a local support option. For Target, the shop-in-shop Apple stores help elevate its brand and drive more traffic to its stores. This is another smart move by Target.

I visited one of these concepts in a Target store in Hew Hampshire. Although it is only a small part of the electronics offering, the concept provides an elevated experience in everything from merchandising to customer service. It was also notable that Target had upgraded non-Apple areas, such as TVs, with better fixtures and displays. The whole thing felt more like Best Buy than Target’s old electronics offering. However it is still a long way from being as good as Apple’s own shops. The one bad thing was the lack of stock and the gaps on fixtures – an age-old Target issue and one that has gotten worse with the supply chain challenges.

The Apple/Target partnership is a win-win for both retailers. Apple is an aspirational brand for many shoppers and Target is moving towards giving all their guests the best of the best under one roof. Target’s locations serve entire communities and this move will only expand Apple’s reach.

Both Target and Apple will benefit from the full-scale deployment (1,800 + stores to go…). Target will be able to draw a new type of customer. The advantage to Apple is less clear but no less probable. Apple will be able to present to customers have thus far not lived near an Apple store (there are 270+ in the U.S.). But the more subtle advantage for Apple is that Apple has a long-term strategy to introduce consumers to its brand, patiently but consistently, until they become new advocates for Apple.

I like this partnership – I only hope that they can have knowledgeable people to help with Apple purchases. I can tell you from experience that there has to be a commitment to the Apple ecosystem, so that means being able to answer questions from interested or current Apple customers.

This is a great indication of just how far Target has come. Some would call Apple a luxury or aspirational brand. And not so long ago some would have called Target a discount or opening price point department store. Target elevated its game and now further elevates it with the Apple shops. It’s unthinkable to say that Apple would consider opening shops in any of the mall anchor department stores. That they are doing it in Target speaks volumes.

Thirty-six stores out of the entire Target portfolio is not much, so both companies will want to maximize e-commerce visibility and sales. As the number of physical locations grows, it helps offset the growing number of freestanding Apple stores in some locations that are no longer as desirable as in the malls’ heydays.

The Apple/Target partnership is good for both companies. Apple gains access to another set of “upscale discount” consumers that visit Target stores and target.com. Target gains access to premium products such as iPhones, Apple Watches, AirPods, etc. Both companies will gain sales from the partnership, and each brand will enhance the consumer reach of the other.

Target is the clear winner here, in my opinion. Apple will certainly benefit from the added sales channels, but Target adds another stellar brand to their shop-in-shop strategy. They continue to make great decisions in becoming a true destination for their shoppers and, in the process, they are creating greater differentiation from Walmart. The shop-in-shop concepts generate new foot traffic combined with joint marketing investments that serve the brand well.

“[T]he ultimate destination for the most sought-after national brands, alongside its stable of coveted owned brands.” If I were a competitor with Target, that would scare me. I think there will be great strength in foot traffic that will prove that Target’s moves to these shop-in-shop experiences are a great addition. And it will definitely improve foot traffic throughout the stores.

The Apple/Target partnership is a big deal for Target. It’s also a big deal for Target shoppers that have RedCard, Circle, and/or employee discounts. It offers an opportunity for price-conscious shoppers to get discounts on Apple products that are normally not discounted.


Having Apple-trained consultants can also help boost foot traffic in Target’s stores. This is a huge win for Target heading into the holiday shopping season, and I expect Apple stores within Target will be successful during the back-to-school shopping season as well.

It’s a beneficial partnership for both companies – it will be interesting to see how this relationship expands and grows.

Target, based on its partnerships with Ulta, Disney, Levi’s, Apple, etc. is on its way to becoming a mall within a store driving experiential retailing. Apple, on the other hand, especially due to the pandemic, is losing its experiential touch within its own stores, oftentimes resulting in a lot of wait times. I think it just makes a lot of sense for Target to elevate their profile to attract more experience-seeking customers and for Apple to gain from that.

This is a win-win. Target carrying the Apple brand name enhances their messaging for upscale discounting. Apple finds another legit distributor for their product lines. Both could leverage a success KPI tied to sales plus market NPS or customer survey information highlighting market affluence, status or perception. However without full deployment the partnership will not move the needle much.

Although both companies win in this arrangement, Target benefits more just from the shear “halo” effect it will receive from Apple. Think overall store redesign as an example. The sharp, clean look in the Apple section will encourage and quite possibly necessitate redesign for other areas within the store.

This is a clear win-win for Apple and Target, especially as the store within a store concept is an outstanding strategy to grow their partnership. While Apple has its significant retail footprint, a store within a store strategy enables brands to expand and scale without the significant capital investments associated with opening a new standalone store.

Target has become the general merchandise retailer of choice, and having a branded customer-first shopping experience is another competitive differentiator. The sky is the limit for this new partnership, especially as Target has only started this pilot with Apple, with only 34 out of a possible 1,900 store locations. Target is exploring expanding its partnerships with Disney, Levi’s, and Ulta.

Good for Target and Apple, but I would say Target gains more than Apple. Apple has managed to go from Apple stores to driving a lot of business online, hence the overnight long lines for new releases at the Apple Stores are much less prevalent. The Target store footprint is good for Apple on the accessories front where you want to try and/or touch the merchandise or pick up a missing headphone or charger. Target gains foot traffic that they can cross sell other items and gain awareness to the Apple customer demographics.