Penny, pennies
©jeminijoseph via Canva.com

February 17, 2025

Should the US Penny Be Ditched?

President Trump has directed the Treasury Department to stop minting new pennies, citing the rising cost of producing the one-cent coin.

“For far too long the United States has minted pennies which literally cost us more than 2 cents. This is so wasteful!” he said in a post on his Truth Social platform. “Let’s rip the waste out of our great nations budget, even if it’s a penny at a time.”

While the debate over whether to keep the penny in circulation has gone on for decades, particularly as costs to produce them have steadily risen, the movement picked up steam last month after Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency raised the prospect in a post on X, highlighting the penny’s cost.

The U.S. Mint reported losing $85.3 million in the 2024 fiscal year that ended in September on the nearly 3.2 billion pennies it produced. Every penny costs 3.69 cents to produce, up from 3.07 cents the year before and 1.5 cents in 2016, according to CBS News.

The move would not be unprecedented. Many countries, including Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, already ditched their one-cent coin years ago. Similar to other countries, should the penny be eliminated, the final, post-tax total in all cash transactions in the U.S. is expected to be rounded, either up or down, to the nearest five-cent increment.

Proponents of keeping pennies in circulation argue that removing them could fuel inflation by forcing consumers to pay a rounded-up price in cash transactions: For example, if an item costs $10.08 after tax, it would be rounded up to $10.10.

However, those in favor of eliminating the coin argue that the impact would be negligible as prices will not always be rounded up with transactions conducted with bills and coins.

“For cash transactions we would begin rounding to the nearest nickel,” Robert Whaples, an economics professor at Wake Forest University, told the Miami Herald. “$1.99 is rounded to $2 and $2.01 is also rounded to $2.”

“Because the last digit of our cash-register totals is completely random, there will be as much rounding down as rounding up. Customers would not lose, on average,” he added, citing a paper he wrote in 2007.

He also noted that transactions are increasingly cashless, and these won’t be affected at all. A 2022 Gallup poll found that 73% of respondents made less than half of their purchases using cash, up from 47% in a 2017 survey.

For retailers, eliminating the penny could reduce checkout waits.

The National Association of Convenience Stores, which has long endorsed the elimination, commissioned a study in 2006 and found that without having to count pennies, the average transaction time fell by 2 to 2.5 seconds. Jeff Lenard, a spokesman for the group, told CNN, “Convenience stores sell a lot of products, but what they really sell is speed of service.”

However, eliminating the penny could alter pricing strategies, including the effectiveness of pricing goods to end with .99, rather than rounding up to the nearest dollar. Pricing ending at .99 has been found to offer a greater perception of value.

The loudest argument against pennies being eliminated is that it could force the production of more nickels — the U.S. Mint estimates that it costs nearly 14 cents per five-cent coin.

“Without the penny, nickel production could nearly double, which would increase the mint’s losses,” Mark Weller, executive director of the pro-penny group Americans for Common Cents (ACC), told ABC News.

The pro-penny advocacy group in a statement also said it believes an “invisible rounding tax” would disproportionately harm low-income individuals and families who rely more heavily on cash purchases, while noting that polls show the majority of Americans favor keeping the penny.

Discussion Questions

In what ways, if at all, would the elimination of the U.S. penny affect retailers?

Should retailers and restaurants strongly support its elimination?

Poll

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders

The cost of making the penny is more than the face value. From an economic point of view, it makes sense to get rid of it. For retail, transactions made in cash would have to be rounded to the nearest nickel – something that could create customer confusion and annoyance if prices are rounded up. And, of course, this isn’t just about the ticket price because the addition of sales tax creates some odd final prices.

Last edited 8 months ago by Neil Saunders
Gene Detroyer
Famed Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

Can we also get rid of the nickel? It costs more to make than it is worth.

And we can get rid of the silly 99 cents and 9/10ths on a gallon of gas.

Richard Hernandez
Richard Hernandez
Noble Member
Reply to  Gene Detroyer

This I agree with 100%. I know it has to do the taxes on gas, but if one station sells it as 99 9/10 and station across the street sells it at 99 8/10, it’t not going to sway my decision- it’s whoever is closer to where I am going and the correct side of the street.

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
Famed Member
Reply to  Gene Detroyer

Ha! Yes the 9/10 is a silly anomaly!

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
Noble Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

Coins and currency are mediums of exchange, far more than stores of value, so the cost of producing them (versus their face value) isn’t really very relevant.

Last edited 8 months ago by Craig Sundstrom
Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
Famed Member

Technically it does matter. Because the US Mint makes a loss on the pennies it produces and that loss ultimately reduces the funds it puts back into the Treasury. It’s small fry in comparison to the total profit, and absolutely minuscule compared to the federal budget, but it does impact the taxpayer at some level. The government should either change the composition of the penny (debase) or scrap it (as they did with the half cent).

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
Noble Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

I assume they’re measuring “loss” by how much it costs to replace old coins (someone trades in $100 worth of pennies and it costs $307 to replace them). No, yes it’s not completely irrelevant, just almost so. But the mint doesn’t exist to make a profit, and even if it did, the proper measure of cost would be long term – i.e. how durable the coins are – not the face value. The coins have already been debased, since they’re essentially copper plated zinc.

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
Famed Member

No, it’s a loss on seigniorage. And the loss is immediate and on issuance – regardless of how many times the money is circulated. As I said, it is minuscule in the scheme of things. But, if one is being nitpickingly efficient then it makes sense to scrap the penny – aided by the fact the utility value of a cent is incredibly low.

Gene Detroyer

Does anyone remember “penny candy”? It was sold for a penny a piece, and today, the Penny Candy store sells the same pieces for ten cents.
Does even anyone carry pennies anymore? Not in my pocket. Nor nickels, dines, or quarters.

Mark Ryski

It’s time for the penny to go away. While I do believe that physical currency still plays an important role in commerce, I don’t believe that the penny is required. The arguments presented in the article, from the cost of producing pennies to the hassle and cost to retailers of managing pennies are compelling enough. I don’t believe that the elimination of the penny would disadvantage consumers in any meaningful way, other than having one less coin to toss in the fountain. 

Paula Rosenblum

while I think the penny should ultimately go away, I think this is the wrong time to do it. The POS changes would be horrifying, and people would assume retailers (who are dealing with pennies when they have their constant swipe fee battles with the banks) are “keeping the extra change.” Bad timing

Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom

We – as a nation, not RW specifically – can’t seem to ditch this inane discussion; the nominal value of a penny compared to the cost of producing it is meaningless, since a penny is circulated thousands of times (obviously if it was one-and-done that would be relevant, but it is not). I’m for keeping it: the alternative is ever more “rounded” prices, the value of which I don’t really find compelling.

Paula Rosenblum
Famed Member

You know, I never even thought of it that way. Thanks for the education! For real.

Neil Saunders
Neil Saunders
Famed Member

I don’t wish to be rude, but this is inaccurate. There is a very real cost attached to producing money that costs more to make than its face value – and it applies regardless of how many times the money is circulated. The process is called seigniorage. Now, the losses on the penny are so minuscule in the scheme of the federal budget that they matter very little. But there is a real loss there that appears on the accounts of the nation.

Last edited 8 months ago by Neil Saunders
Craig Sundstrom
Craig Sundstrom
Noble Member
Reply to  Neil Saunders

No need to apologize: as I acknowledged (further up) you are correct. But I still stand by my opinion that this is the wrong way to look at it: we’re paying for the usefulness of having pennies in circulation; if people are willing to pay 30 cents to have them – the per capita cost – then it’s worthwhile. (But are they? I’ve no idea.)
I think longer term, the bigger – less trivial? – issue is that the same argument can (already) be made for the nickel, and eventually, I imagine, will be made for the dime. How much rounding are we comfortable with?

Perry Kramer
Perry Kramer

The Penny needs to go at some point in the next 5 years. However, in needs to be a long term process not a short term emergency. Setting a long term date similar to the way we approached PCI compliance allows retailers to properly plan the Major IT project that will be required to change Accounting systems, POS systems, Self Checkout systems, coin recyclers, Tax Systems, E-commerece Systems, OMS and Contact center systems, If we make it a short term initiative then retailers will have to defer a planned initiative that would have improved business or efficiency or both.

Last edited 8 months ago by Perry Kramer
David Biernbaum

The cost of producing and distributing a single one-cent piece increased by more than 20% from last year and by 75% from 2021. In the fiscal year 2024, there was a loss of $85.3 million on pennies. In and of itself, that is a sufficient reason to pitch the pennies.

In addition, the cost of producing and distributing pennies is not only financially burdensome but also environmentally unsustainable.

Rather than wasting these resources, they could be redirected to produce higher denomination coins that are more cost-effective and widely used. Furthermore, the materials could be repurposed for renewable energy projects, contributing to a more sustainable future. It may also be possible to reduce the need for physical currency by investing in digital payment infrastructure.

Last edited 8 months ago by David Biernbaum
Bob Amster

If the Mint were a business, the penny would be discontinued immediately. There are consequences in pricing in retail. The “$.99” prices would the disappear, although I believe the US consumer has acclimated to round up to the nearest dollar when they see $.99. Sales taxes reintroduce the need for they penny, unless there is a rounding rule which, statistically, would even out the total cost of rounding up and down. Pennies are annoying to have around physically (unless you own a 1909 SVDB penny). In cashless society – which we are not yet – we could keep the virtual penny without the physical. Alas, we are not there…yet.

Mark Self
Mark Self

There is a cost to handle coins, and how much of that cost involved pennies is a mystery. Anything that costs more to make than it is worth is something that probably should not be made. Or something like that.
So let’s round up or round down and get on with it. The much bigger issue here is the value of our currency. Dropping a coin is not a good look from a inflation point of view, but here we are.

Gail Rodwell-Simon
Gail Rodwell-Simon

We got rid of the penny in 2012 here in Canada. I think the change was gradual to give businesses a chance to adjust. No long term impacts beyond the shock of the initial change. We all just adapted and kept moving forward.

Lisa Goller
Lisa Goller
Noble Member

Gail, I totally agree. Canadians adjusted. Also, discontinuing the penny may have encouraged more of us to evolve beyond cash. When we pay by credit or debit card, we pay the exact amount without needing to round up or down.

Lucille DeHart

As long as we can still use the phrase “A penny for your thoughts,” and sing “Pennies from heaven,” we should be fine. Actually, the impact of eliminating the penny from currency will require repricing and promotional shifts. Stores have long used the .99 and .97 endings to trigger value or final clearance. In addition .95 and other endings can indicate inventory/assortment status of products (fashion, seasonal, sale, etc). Digital currency will not be affected, but hard currency will need to be addressed. Either consumers will pay more or retailers will take margin hits. Also, the 99 cent store concept, which has already been impacted by inflation, will need to reconsider its formula.

Richard J. George, Ph.D.

This seems to be a no brainer. Get rid of the penny, stop the $.99 pricing & make a cheaper nickel.

BrainTrust

"It’s time for the penny to go away. While I do believe that physical currency still plays an important role in commerce, I don’t believe that the penny is required."
Avatar of Mark Ryski

Mark Ryski

Founder, CEO & Author, HeadCount Corporation


"While I think the penny should ultimately go away, I think this is the wrong time to do it. The POS changes would be horrifying…Bad timing."
Avatar of Paula Rosenblum

Paula Rosenblum

Co-founder, RSR Research


"Setting a long-term date similar to the way we approached PCI compliance allows retailers to properly plan the major IT project that will be required to change systems…"
Avatar of Perry Kramer

Perry Kramer

Managing Partner, Retail Consulting Partners


More Discussions