For the majority of shoppers, I think impulse buying is much lower while shopping online than in-store. With weekly shopping lists that can be saved online and just adding the additional items each week, shopping is more mechanical and there is less time spent exploring unplanned purchases. While in the store, there are lots of opportunities to be tempted by products that catch your eye or your kid’s eye. Remember the days when grocery stores had samples of new products? That was another opportunity for impulse purchases.

What I think doesn’t much matter – there should be real data (not self-reported survey data) on this topic. For example, Kroger knows what volume of impulse items they sold two years ago, last year, and this year and can identify whether a sale came from in-store or online (and could probably split online into BOPIS and delivery). We should see what that data says – people these days will lie through their teeth as a self-image protection measure.

I just know that I don’t stick to the list when I shop for groceries online. I also find that sales drive me to go outside the box. I think grocers need to get more creative in their flash sales (limited offers for the next five minutes creatively presented that match the market basket). Real-time analytics will drive customer behavior if presented in a user-friendly interface with relevant content.

I think impulse buying has to be going down. “Browsing through the store” is more challenging when buying online, and while grocers have taken to presenting “did you forget” items right before checkout, it’s generally not the same as what you see at the checkout stand in a store.

It seems to me that the more these sites use ML for customers who shop with some frequency, the more likely they are to get those impulse buys during the shopping trip.

This stat made me stop in my tracks: “Thirty-one percent of shoppers reported that one reason for using e-grocery is to avoid making impulse purchases.” Retailers must get very creative building the basket AND doing it with the shopper’s interest in mind. Expecting these list-driven shoppers to add something that doesn’t help solve their immediate need state may simply be a wish. I’m eager to see how basket building can be achieved more purposefully.

This really depends on the consumer and how and why they shop online for food. There are also variances by category with treat products more likely to be bought on impulse when shopping online. However, generally speaking, online does suppress some impulse shopping and, interestingly, we have also found that it reduces the tendency to switch brands in some categories. Both are mostly because a lot of online shoppers buy from lists or navigate to items they regularly purchase and are more inclined to ignore other products compared to their counterparts in physical stores.

Moving online will definitely call for redefining the merchandising strategy for impulse products. Even the role of packaging in the online world will see some changes – why do we need expensive colorful packaging that is primarily designed for attracting customers to pick the product from the shelf? I recently spoke to a company that is making much lower margins on one SKU only because the signature ink they use on the package is very unique and expensive.

I may take some criticism for this, but this is not unlike the difference between shopping for clothing on the Internet and browsing through an attractive printed catalog. My bet is that there is a better chance of the consumer buying an impulse item (something for which I was not looking, but liked it once I saw it). Similarly, there is a better chance of buying an impulse item while strolling the aisles of a supermarket than shopping from a list on the Internet.

Stores’ immersive sensory experience makes impulse purchases more tempting and likely. By contrast e-commerce can make shopping more rational. We may shop by category and focus more on meal planning than on non-essential items.

That said, I have at ten bags of chips in my pantry. (Who among us can resist three for $8?)

Online deals and limited-time offers can work, especially in non-staple categories that we might otherwise neglect while shopping from home.

Generally speaking, I think that shopping online will reduce impulse buys – it’s something I can personally attest to in the way my family buys groceries. Having said that, smaller baskets could be a small price to pay if having a great online platform drives enough frequency and transactions to even out the equation. As with many things, a lot of answers lie in the data where smart retailers can offer high-affinity products to online shoppers or leverage shopper analytics to increase baskets. Another needed consideration is that not all smaller baskets are due to lack of impulse — some could be competitive siphoning that is occurring now that shoppers are able to directly compare groceries at the same time and decide to buy the chips and wine from one retailer and the produce from another to all get delivered on the same day. The impulse buy was still there – it just went to a competitor. Again – the truth lies in the data and having the right competitive analytics can help retailers better… Read more »

Great question. Personally I find my impulse buying drops to almost zero when I use online ordering for groceries. Navigating my shopping list takes all of my attention as I hunt and peck at the items I want. I rarely see suggestions for complimentary items because I’m too focused on getting to the next item and checking out. There certainly are opportunities to drive more impulse purchases in online grocery shopping. I believe they all involve personalization and understanding shopper preferences. A simple one that the grocery where I shop still doesn’t do, and I think is a miss, is to recommend items from previous orders that aren’t on the current order. I would actually appreciate that recommendation since I tend to forget items. Another is to really understand what items compliment each other. Using big data and market basket analysis this can go beyond the obvious peanut butter and jelly. We’ve been doing this with targeted coupons for years. To take this to the next level, understand what items might be complimentary for the… Read more »

Until search, discovery, frequently paired suggestions, and even merchandising (yes, merchandising for grocery!) is improved with robust AI technology then impulse purchases online will lag because the customer is not being shown the right merchandise. I just published an article on this!

I remember the good old days (like five years ago), walking through a Whole Foods and seeing a stubbed roman pillar with mounds of chocolate on it. What person in their right mind wouldn’t just grab some of that, especially since you were offered a taste? Those days are over, and the algorithms that give you “if you like this, you’ll like this” just don’t work for grocery impulse yet. Can it get there? Sure, but it’s a long way from mounds of enticing chocolate right now.

I can’t speak to anyone else’s habits, but I am definitely open to impulse buying when shopping for groceries online (which I have done exclusively for the past 13 months, so I now have lots of experience!). What I think is missing is creativity from the grocers to make it more likely for me to add unplanned items to my cart. I just have not seen much effort made to incentivize impulse purchases, and I think there is a great untapped opportunity there. Integrate recipes featuring seasonal produce into my journey. Introduce me to new items and make me an offer I can’t refuse, and I will expand my basket, I promise!

Intuitively it would seem impulse would be higher in-store, especially for food shopping, where all products are visible and those visual cues drive consideration. However without having the data it’s hard to say for sure.

Grocers are already using banners and search terms, especially as they turn their websites into media platforms. Those ad methods likely drive some awareness and convert impulse buys. Over time sites will be even more customized based on past behaviors and insight from other platforms to predict or prescribe items that will undoubtedly drive more impulse.

They might do something like Netflix and have a percentage likelihood a particular food is a match or “these friends gave this product a five star rating.” So more and better integration of familiar tactics from sites people spend time on. LOTS more to do on the e-commerce front.

There are conveniences, efficiencies, and time savings associated with online grocery shopping. However the art of discovery and impulse shopping is lost, with customers being far more purpose-driven with their e-grocery shopping experiences.

However as the user experience evolves and the e-grocery platforms became hyper-personalized, there may be opportunities to communicate flash deals and other items that the customer may be interested in based on their shopping histories. It will take plenty of machine learning, AI, and a hyper-personalized strategy to get to that point of predicting, responding to, and understanding consumer needs.

I still prefer to do my own grocery shopping where I am almost programmed to make impulse purchases. As a store planner I am acutely aware of how a sales floor is set up to encourage impulse buys and yet I still do it.

I also regularly order groceries via Instacart for an out-of-state family member and I almost never make impulse buys. Sure I may look for additional items she may enjoy, but those additional items require thought, they aren’t added to the cart on impulse. Grocery shopping online is almost an automatic experience: click to find the items on your list and click to buy. Easy, done, over.

It is hard to impulse shop online – I go to buy and then pretty much leave the site when done. Some sites do show you new items on the splash page to consider but it is just not the same as when you are in an actual store.

Online, we are shopping list people. We either put the item we want in the search bar or go to the category (i.e. snacks or ice cream).

The difference in the studies may have to do with the definition of impulse buying. I define an impulse buy as something I had no desire or need to purchase, but I see it on a shelf and think I should try it. I do not define impulse buying as having corn chips on my grocery list and adding pita chips when I get to that shelf or category.

One of the benefits of online grocery shopping is that it is not necessary to shop the entire store (go up and down aisles). The online retailers have structured their sites to accommodate convenience. If they institute anything to encourage the impulse buying experience similar to that of in-store, I believe they will chase away their shoppers.

I share most panelists’ personal experience of more impulse buying inside a grocery store vs. “sticking to the list” when shopping online. There are no feature displays on physical endcaps (although grocers can do a better job simulating this experience online), and no checkout lanes filled with candy and soda.

But Stephen Needel makes a key point: Grocers themselves have more data than we do on the subject. Their ability to mine the data should lead them to modify consumers’ behavior when they are shopping online.

Online shopping just doesn’t lend itself to impulse buying as much as walking through a store with attention-grabbing displays of items on each end-cap or at the checkout counter.